Advertisement

Inventory control in dual sourcing commodity procurement with price correlation

  • Karl Inderfurth
  • Peter Kelle
  • Rainer KleberEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the role of inventory management as a means for operational hedging by dual sourcing of commodities using a multi-period option contract and spot market. We consider a manufacturing company in a make-to-stock environment with uncertain product demand. We replace the common i.i.d. price assumption that is typical in operations management studies by the mean reverting price model, a more realistic spot price model with inter-temporal price–price correlation. Additionally, we address the case where the spot price in one period is correlated with the demand in the previous period (demand–price correlation). The contribution of the paper is threefold. First, we reveal that price–price correlation has a considerable impact on the structural properties of optimal stock-keeping policies. Furthermore, we isolate two main effects of correlation in spot-price dynamics when selecting policy parameters: a variability effect, which increases the benefits from stock-keeping and lessens the usage of the option contract, and a counteracting correlation effect that exploits persistence of low/high spot price incidences. Finally, in a numerical study we show under which circumstances disregarding the correlation can result in large performance losses.

Keywords

Stochastic programming Dynamic programming Inventory theory and control Capacity planning and investment 

References

  1. Axsäter S (2006) Inventory control, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes-Schuster D, Bassok Y, Anupindi R (2002) Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 4(3):171–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berling P, Martínez-de Albéniz V (2011) Optimal inventory policies when purchase price and demand are stochastic. Oper Res 59(1):109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berling P, Xie Z (2014) Approximation algorithms for optimal purchase/inventory policy when purchase price and demand are stochastic. OR Spectr 36:1077–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bessembinder H, Coughenour J, Sequin P, Smoller M (1995) Mean reversion in equilibrium asset prices: evidence from futures term structure. J Finance 50:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billington C (2002) HP cuts risk with portfolio approach, purchasing, Feb 21, 2002Google Scholar
  7. Chen F, Xue W, Yang J (2013) Technical note: optimal inventory policy in the presence of a long-term supplier and a spot market. Oper Res 61(1):88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng Q, Sethi S (2010) Procurement flexibility under price uncertainty. In: Cheng TCE, Choi TM (eds) Innovative quick response programs in logistics and supply chain management. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Golabi K (1985) Optimal inventory policies when ordering prices are random. Oper Res 33(3):575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haksöz C, Seshadri S (2007) Supply chain operations in the presence of a spot market: a review with discussion. J Oper Res Soc 58(11):1412–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong Z, Lee CKM, Nie X (2014) Proactive and reactive purchasing planning under dependent demand, price, and yield risks. OR Spectr 36(4):1055–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Inderfurth K, Kelle P (2011) Capacity reservation under spot market price uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 133(1):272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inderfurth K, Kelle P, Kleber R (2013) Dual sourcing using capacity reservation and spot market: optimal procurement policy and heuristic parameter determination. Eur J Oper Res 225(2):298–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Issler JV, Rodrigues C, Burjack R (2014) Using common features to understand the behavior of metal-commodity prices and forecast them at different horizons. J Int Money Finance 42:310–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kallestrup KB, Lynge LH, Akkerman R, Oddsdottir TA (2014) Decision support in hierarchical planning systems: the case of procurement planning in oil refining industries. Decis Support Syst 68:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keyvanloo M, Kimiagari AM, Esfahanipour A (2015) A hybrid approach to select the best sourcing policy using stochastic programming. J Manuf Syst 36:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kouvelis P, Chambers C, Wang H (2006) Supply chain management research and production and operations management: review, trends, and opportunities. Prod Oper Manag 15(3):449–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kouvelis P, Li R, Ding Q (2013) Managig storable commodity risks: the role of inventory and financial hedge. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 15(3):507–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee CKM, Lin D, Pasari R (2014) Strategic procurement from forward contract and spot market. Ind Manag Data Syst 114(5):778–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee HL, So KC, Tang CS (2000) The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Manag Sci 46:626–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li S, Murat A, Huang W (2009) Selection of contract suppliers under price and demand uncertainty in a dynamic market. Eur J Oper Res 198:830–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo ML, Li G, Wan CLJ, Qu R, Ji P (2015) Supply chain coordination with dual procurement sources via real-option contract. Comput Ind Eng 80(1):274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma Y, Wang N, Che A, Huang Y, Xu J (2013) The bullwhip effect under different information-sharing settings: a perspective on price-sensitive demand that incorporates price dynamics. Int J Prod Res 51:3085–3116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meade N (2010) Oil prices—Brownian motion or mean reversion? A study using a one year ahead density forecast criterion. Energy Econ 32:1485–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merzifonluoğlu Y (2015) Risk averse supply portfolio selection with supply, demand and spot market volatility. Omega 57:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nagali V, Hwang J, Sanghera D, Gaskins M, Pridgen M, Thurston T, Mackenroth P, Branvold D, Scholler P, Shoemaker G (2008) Procurement risk management (PRM) at Hewlett-Packard company. Interfaces 38(1):51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwartz E (1997) The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: implications for valuation and hedging. J Finance 52:923–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwartz E, Smith JE (2000) Short-term variations and long-term dynamics in commodity prices. Manag Sci 46:893–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Secomandi N (2010) Optimal commodity trading with a capacitated storage asset. Manag Sci 56(3):449–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Secomandi N, Kekre S (2014) Optimal energy procurement in spot and forward markets. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 16(2):270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seifert RW, Thonemann UW, Hausman WH (2004) Optimal procurement strategies for online spot markets. Eur J Oper Res 152:781–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Summers LH (1986) Does the stock market rationally reflect fundamental values? J Finance 41:591–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Delft C, Vial JP (2004) A practical implementation of stochastic programming: an application to the evaluation of option contracts in supply chains. Automatica 40(5):743–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xiao G, Yang N, Zhang R (2015) Dynamic pricing and inventory management under fluctuating procurement costs. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 17:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu H (2010) Managing production and procurement through option contracts in supply chains with random yield. Int J Prod Econ 126(2):306–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu J, Feng G, Jiang W, Wang S (2015) Optimal procurement of long-term contracts in the presence of imperfect spot market. Omega 52:42–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang X, Burke GJ (2011) Analysis of compound bullwhip causes. Eur J Oper Res 210(3):514–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao X, Xing W, Liu L, Wang S (2015) Demand information and spot price information: supply chains trading in spot markets. Eur J Oper Res 246:837–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and ManagementOtto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Information Systems and Decision SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations