Central European Journal of Operations Research

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 611–625 | Cite as

A qualitative multi-criteria modelling approach to the assessment of electric energy production technologies in Slovenia

  • Marko BohanecEmail author
  • Nejc Trdin
  • Branko Kontić
Original Paper


A methodological approach to the strategic evaluation of electric energy production technologies in Slovenia is presented. The aim of this work is to make a transparent and reproducible identification of reliable, rational, and environmentally sound production of electric energy in Slovenia by 2050. The approach is based on a qualitative multi-criteria modelling method DEX and consists of three stages: (1) assessment of individual technologies for electricity production, (2) assessment of mixtures of technologies and (3) evaluation of scenarios of shutting-down existing old power plants and constructing the new ones until 2050. Technology alternatives include both conventional and renewable energy sources: coal fired, gas fired, biomass fired, oil fired, nuclear, hydro, wind, and photovoltaic. The results indicate that only mixtures of nuclear, hydro, and gas fired technologies can meet expected energy needs in a sufficiently reliable and rational way.


Electric energy production technology Power plants Multi-criteria decision modelling Qualitative model Decision rules Method DEX 



This research has been financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia (Research Voucher No. OPRR/1/1/002-0-MIZKŠ dated September 24, 2012), and GEN energija, d.o.o., and was implemented as a research voucher project in the framework of the EU Operational Programme for Strengthening Regional Development Potentials for the period 2007–2013, priority axis “Competitiveness and research excellence”.


  1. Begić F, Afgan N (2007) Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system-Bosnian case. Energy 32(10):1979–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohanec M (2015) DEXi: program for multi-attribute decision making, user’s manual, version 5.00. In: Report IJS DP-11897. Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana,
  3. Bohanec M, Rajkovič V, Bratko I, Zupan B, žnidaršič M (2013) DEX methodology: three decades of qualitative multi-attribute modelling. Informatica 37:49–54Google Scholar
  4. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multi criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowiński R (2010) Dominance-based rough set approach to decision under uncertainty and time preference. Ann Oper Res 176(1):41–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirschberg S, Dones R, Heck T, Burgherr P, Schenler W, Bauer C (2004) Sustainability of electricity supply technologies under German conditions: a comparative evaluation. Paul Scherrer Institut, PSI Bericht Nr. 04-15, ISSN 1019-0643Google Scholar
  7. Ishizaka A, Nemery P (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. Wiley, SomersetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kahraman C, Kaya I (2010) A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 37:6270–6281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kontić B, Kontić D, Zagorc S, Matko M, Dermol U, Bohanec M, Trdin, N (2014) Ocena vzdržnosti za razvoj energetike v Sloveniji do leta 2030s poudarkom na jedrski tehnologiji (Appraisal of Sustainability of Electrical Energy Production in Slovenia with the Emphasis on Nuclear Technology). In: Report IJS DP-11583. Jožef Stefan Institute, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  10. Kontić B, Bohanec M, Kontić D, Trdin N, Matko M (2016) Improving appraisal of sustainability of energy options—a view from Slovenia. Energy Policy 90:154–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Legget J (2016) Winning of the carbon war. Latest edition of the e-book,
  12. Mainali B, Silveira S (2015) Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:1351–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2014) Making sustainable energy choices. In: Insights on the Energy/Water/Land nexus. US Department of Energy,
  14. Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 8:365–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ribeiro F, Ferreira P, Araújo M (2013) Evaluating future scenarios for the power generation sector using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool: the Portuguese case. Energy 52:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98Google Scholar
  17. Santoyo-Castelazo E, Azapagic A (2014) Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. J Clean Prod 80:119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stein EW (2013) A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 22:640–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Trdin N, Bohanec M (2014). New generation platform for multi-criteria decision making with method DEX. DSS 2.0—supporting decision making with new technologies, supplemental proceedings. In: Phillips-Wren G, Carlsson S, Burstein F, Respício A, Brézillon P (eds) IFIP working group 8.3 digital publications. ISSN 1647–7103, 12Google Scholar
  20. Wimmler C, Hejazi G, de Oliveira Fernandes E, Moreira C, Connors S (2015) Multi-criteria decision support methods for renewable energy systems on Islands. J Clean Energy Technol 3(3):185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. World Nuclear Association (WNA) (2016) Renewable energy and electricity. Available at
  22. Žnidaršič M, Bohanec M (2010) Handling uncertainty in DEX methodology. URPDM 2010: Uncertainty and robustness in planning and decision making. In: Antunes CH et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 25th Mini-EURO conference. University of Coimbra, 15–17 AprilGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate SchoolLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations