Abstract
Participants in parliamentary voting—usually political parties—are evaluated with a value that assigns them predicted power with respect to their strength by so called power indices. However, in real world, political parties’ representatives act not strictly as predicted in theory. One possibility how the representatives differ from theory is the way they form coalitions; the coalitions can be announced (for example official governmental coalition parties in multiparty parliaments) or hidden. To incorporate the coalition forming influence, Bilal et al. (http://aei.pitt.edu/2052/1/001591_1.pdf, 2001) proposed to consider additional weights to possible coalitions into power indices. This article applies the concept of additional weights to calculate an ex post power distribution using Shapley–Shubik power index together with Banzhaf power index on real voting data, namely the data from the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Parliament with the emphasis on the State Budget voting issues during 2006–2010 parliamentary period.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleskerov F, Otchour O (2007) Extended Shapley–Owen indices and power distribution in the III state Duma of the Russian Federation. LSE’s CPNSS working papers
Banzhaf JF (1965) Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev 19:317–343
Barr J, Passarelli F (2009) Who has the power in the EU? Math Soc Sci 57:339–366. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.12.007
Benati S, Marzetti GV (2013) Probabilistic spatial power indices. Soc Choice Welf 40:391–410. doi:10.1007/s00355-011-0608-4
Bilal S, Albuquerque P, Hosli MO (2001) The probability of coalition formation: spatial voting power indices. In: The ECPR general conference/Pan-European IR conference, Canterbury, England, 6–8 September 2001, Madison, Wisconsin. AEI http://aei.pitt.edu/2052/1/001591_1.pdf. Accessed 07 May 2015
Coleman JS (1971) Control of collectives and the power of a collectivity to act. In: Lieberman B (ed) Social choice. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 192–225
Freixas J, Pons M (2013) Success and decisiveness on proper symmetric games. Cent Eur J Oper Res [online]. doi:10.1007/s10100-013-0332-5
Freixas J, Zwicker WS (2003) Weighted voting, abstention, and multiple levels of approval. Soc Choice Welf 21:399–431. doi:10.1007/s00355-003-0212-3
Gambarelli G, Uristani A (2009) Multicameral voting cohesion games. Cent Eur J Oper Res 17:433–460. doi:10.1007/s10100-009-0102-6
Godfrey J (2005) Computation of the Shapley–Owen power index in two dimensions. In: 4th Annual workshop, University of Warwick 2005 [online]. http://www.lse.ac.uk/CPNSS/research/projectsCurrentlyOnHold/VPP/VPPpdf/VPPpdf_Wshop2005/godfrey.pdf. Accessed 07 May 2015
Haller H (1994) Collusion properties of values. Int J Game Theory 23:261–281. doi:10.1007/BF01247318
Hu X (2006) An asymmetric Shapley–Shubik power index. Int J Game Theory 34:229–240. doi:10.1007/s00182-006-0011-z
López S, Saboya M (2009) On the relationship between Shapley and Owen values. Cent Eur J Oper Res 17:415–423. doi:10.1007/s10100-009-0100-8
Owen G (1977) Values of Games with a priori Unions. In: Henn R, Moeschlin O (eds) Essays in mathematical economics and game theory. Fields Institute, Berlin, pp 76–88
Penrose L (1946) The elementary statistics of majority voting. J R Stat Soc 109:53–57. doi:10.2307/2981392
Rae DW (1969) Decision rules and individual values in constitutional choice. Am Polit Sci Rev 63:40–56. doi:10.2307/1954283
Shapley LS (1953) A value for n-Person Games. In: Kuhn H, Tucker AW (eds) Contribution to the theory of games. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 307–317
Shapley LS, Owen G (1989) Optimal location of candidates in ideological space. Int J Game Theory 18:339–356. doi:10.1007/BF01254297
Shapley LS, Shubik M (1954) A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am Polit Sci Rev 48:784–792. doi:10.2307/1951053
Škochová M (2008) Analýza voleb do Poslanecké sněmovny Parlamentu České republiky v roce 2006 [online]. E-polis.cz, 15.srpen 2008. http://www.e-polis.cz/clanek/analyza-voleb-do-poslanecke-snemovny-parlamentu-ceske-republiky-v-roce-2006.html. Accessed 07 May 2015
Valkova H (2013) Poslanci si polepšili o tisíce korun. Z peněz na d\(\mathring{{\rm u}}\)chody a nemocné [online]. http://zpravy.idnes.cz/politici-dostali-vyssi-platy-d21-/domaci.aspx?c=A130307_132321_domaci_hv. Accessed 07 May 2015
Web: Presidential election: volby prezidenta České republiky (1993–2008) [online]. https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volby_prezidenta_%C4%8Cesk%C3%A9_republiky_%281993-2008%29. Accessed 07 May 2015
Web: Poslanecká sněmovna Parlamentu České republiky [online]. http://www.psp.cz/sqw/hp.sqw. Accessed 07 May 2015
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic project No. 14-02424S.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mielcová, E. Spatial power indices with applications on real voting data from the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Parliament. Cent Eur J Oper Res 24, 407–420 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0406-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0406-7