Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of human agent in project management

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article deals with the effect of a human agent on the activity realization in a project. It does so from the perspective of the Theory of Constraints where the weakest point is the deadline of partial activity. Every existing activity in any project is, to a higher or lower extent, determined by the effect of the human agent. The inefficiency of a number of projects in practice is largely caused by an unsuccessful realization of partial activities. The effect of the human agent is in this respect fundamental. The human agent, as an allocated resource in the activity, is liable to a number of non-specified impacts and stimuli, and as such s/he is rather versatile in his/her behaviour. The versatility of the human agent in projects can be described by the “Student Syndrome” phenomenon and by the first “Parkinson’s law”. Both these qualitative phenomena create a starting point for the introduced theoretical and quantitative research. The findings in this article are based on the set of real data of work effort of the students of daily study programme on one university in the Czech Republic. The article presents, as the authors’ own theoretical contribution, a mathematical model for the “Student Syndrome” phenomenon with a practical use in quantitative methods of project management. This model was derived analytically from a performed data analysis and we can assume that it will be useful for further theoretical development of quantitative methods in project management. In the article we deduce the theoretical differentiation of the “Student Syndrome” phenomenon in work effort into three terminable phases during three different types of resource work allocation. We can regard this original viewpoint as suggestive for the area of human resources management in projects. Its contribution lies in delimitation of time-targeted resource stimulation, which may lead to lower project costs, besides higher work efficiency and compliance with time-targeted deadlines of activity termination. The article brings the quantification of qualitative features of the human agent in project management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Branzei R, Ferrari G, Fragnelli V, Tijs S (2010) A bonus-malus approach to project management. Cent Eur J Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10100-010-0139-6

  • Cook SC (1998) Applying critical chain to improve the management of uncertainty in projects. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA. (Online)

  • Goldratt EM (1990) What is this thing called theory of constraints and how it should be implemented. The North River Press, Great Barrington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez GJ, Kouvelis P (1991) Parkinson’s law and its implications for project management. Manag Sci 37(8): 990–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herroelen W, Leus R (2001) On the merits and pitfalls of critical chain scheduling. J Oper Manag 19(5): 559–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König CJ, Kleinmann M (2005) Deadline rush: a time management phenomenon and its mathematical description. J Psychol Interdiscip Appl 139(1): 33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach LP (1999) Critical chain project management improves project performance. Proj Manag J 30(2): 39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechler TG, Ronen B, Stohr EA (2005) Critical chain: a new project management paradigm or old wine in new bottles?. Eng Manag J 17(4): 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Monhor D (2010) A new probabilistic approach to the path criticality in stochastic PERT. Cent Eur J Oper Res. doi:10.1007/s10100-010-0151-x

  • Parkinson CN (1991) Parkinson’s law and other selected writings on management, 1st edn. Federal Publications (S) Pte Ltd, Singapure

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston A, Rabinowitz P (1978) A first course in numerical analysis, 2nd edn. New York

  • Rand GK (2000) Critical chain: the theory of constraints applied to project management. Int J Proj Manag 18: 173–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šubrt T (2004) Multiple criteria network models for project management. Agric Econ (AGRICECON) 50(2):71–76. ISSN 0139-570X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadepalli S, Booth C, Pryor M (2009) Evaluating academic procrastination in a personalized system of instruction based curriculum. ASEE annual conference and exposition. Conference proceedings

  • Zika-Viktorsson A, Ingelgård A (2006) Reflecting activities in product developing teams: conditions for improved project management processes. Res Eng Des 17: 103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Bartoska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartoska, J., Subrt, T. The effect of human agent in project management. Cent Eur J Oper Res 20, 369–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-011-0209-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-011-0209-4

Keywords

Navigation