Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity analysis incorporating fuzzy evaluation for scaling constants of multiattribute utility functions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multiattribute utility function can be represented by a function of single-attribute utility functions if the decision maker’s preference satisfies additive independence or mutually utility independence. Additive independence is a preference condition stronger than mutually utility independence, and the multiattribute utility function is in the additive form if the former condition is satisfied, otherwise it is in the multiplicative form. In this paper, we propose a method for sensitivity analysis of multiattribute utility functions in multiplicative form, taking into account the imprecision of the decision maker’s judgment in the procedures for determining scaling constants (attribute weights).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bana e Costa CA (1988) A methodology for sensitivity analysis in three-criteria problems: a case study in municipal management. Eur J Oper Res 33: 159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron H, Schmidt CP (1988) Sensitivity analysis of additive multiattribute value models. Oper Res 36: 122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke P (1985) A preference ranking organisation method (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision making). Manage Sci 31: 647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24: 228–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J, Jia J, Dyer J (1997) Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. Eur J Oper Res 103: 531–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addision Wesley, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez A, Ríos-Insua S, Mateos A (2003) A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignment. Decis Support Syst 36: 65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, von Winterfeldt D (1994) Managing nuclear waste from power plants. Risk Anal 14: 107–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z (1996) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs, third, revised and extended edition. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishizaki I, Seo F (1994) Interactive support for fuzzy trade-off evaluation in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 68: 309–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringuest JL (1997) L P -metric sensitivity analysis for single and multi-attribute decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 98: 563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa M (2001) Genetic algorithms and fuzzy multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa M, Seo F (1982) Integrated methodology for computer-aided decision analysis. In: Trappl R, Hanika F, Tomlinson R (eds) Progress in cybernetics and systems research. Hemisphere Publishing, New York, pp 333–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo F, Nishizaki I (1997) On development of interactive decision analysis support systems, presented at the IIASA Workshop on Advances in Methodology and Software for Decision Support Systems, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 1997 (Available from IIASA as Electronic version; http://www.iiasa.ac.at/~marek/dss97/)

  • Seo F, Nishizaki I, Park S-H (1999) Multiattribute utility analysis using object-oriented programming MAP and its application, Study of business administration and informatics 7. Setsunan University, Try, pp 27–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo F, Nishizaki I, Hamamoto H (2004) Development of an interactive software for supporting multiobjective decision analysis —MIDASS (Multiobjective Interactive Decision Analysis Support System). In: Trappl R (eds) cybernetics and systems research. Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna, pp 475–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicherman A (1975) An interactive computer program for assessing and using multiattribute utility functions, technical report 111. Operations Research Center, MIT

  • von Nitzsch R, Weber M (1988) Utility function assessment on a micro-computer: an interactive procedure. Ann Oper Res 16: 149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei QL, Ma J, Fan ZP (2000) A parameter analysis method for the weight-set satisfy preference orders of alternatives in additive multi-criteria value models. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 9: 181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters WTM, Mareschal B (1995) Novel types of sensitivity analysis for additive MCDM methods. Eur J Oper Res 81: 281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohiro Hayashida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishizaki, I., Katagiri, H. & Hayashida, T. Sensitivity analysis incorporating fuzzy evaluation for scaling constants of multiattribute utility functions. Cent Eur J Oper Res 18, 383–396 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-009-0115-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-009-0115-1

Keywords

Navigation