Skip to main content
Log in

A computational comparison of some branch and bound methods for indefinite quadratic programs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss different branch and bound methods for solving indefinite quadratic programs. In these methods the quadratic objective function is decomposed in a d.c. form and the relaxations are obtained by linearizing the concave part of the decomposition. In this light, various decomposition schemes have been considered and studied. The various branch and bound solution methods have been implemented and compared by means of a deep computational test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrientos O and Correa R (2000). An algorithm for global minimization of linearly constrained quadratic functions. J Global Optim 16: 77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best MJ and Ding B (1997). Global and local quadratic minimization. J Global Optim 10: 77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best MJ and Ding B (2000). A decomposition method for global and local quadratic minimization. J Global Optim 16: 133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bomze IM and Danninger G (1994). A finite algorithm for solving general quadratic problems. J Global Optim 4: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bomze IM (2002). Branch-and-bound approaches to standard quadratic optimization problems. J Global Optim 22: 17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bomze IM and Locatelli M (2004). Undominated d.c. decompositions of quadratic functions and applications to branch-and-bound approaches. Comput Optim Appl 28: 227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambini R and Sodini C (2005). Decomposition methods for solving nonconvex quadratic programs via branch and bound. J Global Optim 33(3): 313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churilov L and Sniedovich M (1999). A concave composite programming perspective on D.C. programming. In: Eberhard, A, Hill, R, Ralph, D and Glover, BM (eds) Progress in optimization, Applied Optimization, vol 30, pp. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis PL, Pardalos PM and Toraldo G (1997). Quadratic Programming with Box Constraints. In: Bomze, IM (eds) Developments in global optimization, pp 73–93. Kluwer, Dordrecht,

    Google Scholar 

  • Floudas CA and Visweswaran V (1995). Quadratic Optimization. In: Horst, R and Pardalos, PM (eds) Handbook of global optimization, nonconvex optimization and its applications, vol 2, pp 217–269. Kluwer, Dordrecht,

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantmacher FR (1960). The theory of matrices, vol 1. Chelsea, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, Jaumard B, Ruiz M and Xiong J (1993). Global minimization of indefinite quadratic functions subject to box constraints. Naval Res Logistics 40: 373–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiriart-Urruty JB (1985) Generalized differentiability, duality and optimization for problems dealing with differences of convex functions. In: Convexity and duality in optimization, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 256. Springer, Berlin

  • Horst R (1976). An algorithm for nonconvex programming problems. Math Program 10(3): 312–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horst R (1980). A note on the convergence of an algorithm for nonconvex programming problems. Math Program 19(2): 237–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horst R and Tuy H (1990). Global optimization. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst R, Pardalos PM and Thoai NV (1995). Introduction to global optimization, nonconvex optimization and its applications, vol 3. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst R and Van Thoai N (1996). A new algorithm for solving the general quadratic programming problem. Comput Optim Appl 5(1): 39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konno H (1976). Maximization of a convex quadratic function under linear constraints. Math Program 11(2): 117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Thi Hoai An and Pham Dinh Tao (1997) Solving a class of linearly constrained indefinite quadratic problems by D.C. algorithms. J Global Optim 11:253–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Muu LD and Oettli W (1991). An algorithm for indefinite quadratic programming with convex constraints. Oper Res Lett 10(6): 323–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardalos PM, Glick JH and Rosen JB (1987). Global minimization of indefinite quadratic problems. Computing 39(4): 281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardalos PM (1991). Global optimization algorithms for linearly constrained indefinite quadratic problems. Comput Math Appl 21: 87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phong Thai Quynh, Le Thi Hoai An and Pham Dinh Tao (1995) Decomposition branch and bound method for globally solving linearly constrained indefinite quadratic minimization problems. Oper Res Lett 17(5):215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen JB and Pardalos PM (1986). Global minimization of large scale constrained concave quadratic problems by separable programming. Math Program 34: 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoai NV (2005). General Quadratic Programming. In: Audet, C, Hansen, P and Savard, G (eds) Essays and survey in global optimization, pp 107–129. Springer, Berlin,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tuy H (1995). D.C. Optimization: theory, methods and algorithms. In: Horst, R and Pardalos, PM (eds) Handbook of global optimization, nonconvex optimization and its applications, vol 2, pp 149–216. Kluwer, Dordrecht,

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuy H (1998). Convex analysis and global optimization, nonconvex optimization and its applications, vol 22. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Cambini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cambini, R., Sodini, C. A computational comparison of some branch and bound methods for indefinite quadratic programs. cent.eur.j.oper.res. 16, 139–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-007-0049-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-007-0049-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

JEL Classification

Navigation