Skip to main content
Log in

Positioning of new brands in an experiment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with an experimental investigation of positioning new brands. For this purpose, a management game was carried out with students. The brands introduced in the cause of the game were analysed in respect to their positions in a two-dimensional feature space. We try to find out which of the two strategies, niche policy and imitation, is more frequently used in complex decision situations and if there is a difference in profits. Furthermore, we want to find out, whether differences of prices and advertising exist in our experiment depending on the positioning strategy used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barreda I, García-Gallego A, Georgantzís N, Andaluz J, Gil A (2000) Price competition and product differentiation: experimental evidence. LINEEX Working Papers 16/00, Laboratory for Research in Experimental Economics

  • Becker O, Selten R (1970) Experiences with the management game SINTO-market. In: Sauermann H (ed) Contributions to experimental economics, vol 2. Mohr J. C. B. (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, pp 136–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner S (2001) Determinants of product differentiation: a survey, Discussion papers 2001, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Institute of Management, Humboldt- of Berlin

  • Brockhoff K (1999) Produktpolitik, 4. Auflage, Lucius und Lucius Stuttgart

  • Brown-Kurse J, Cronshaw MB, Schenk DJ (1993) Theory and experiments on spatial competition. Econ Inq 31:139–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho-Cuena E, García-Gallego A, Georgantzís N, Sabater-Grande G (2005) Buyer–seller interaction in experimental spatial markets. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35:89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins R, Sherstyuk K (2000) Spatial competition with three firms: an experimental study. Econ Inq 38:73–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Kagel JH (2005) Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. Am Econ Rev 95:447–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JC, Hayne SC (2002) Barking up the right tree. Are small groups rational agents? Working Paper, University of Arizona

  • D’Aspremont C, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse JF (1979) On Hotelling “Stability in competition”. Econometrica 47:1145–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egli A (2005) Hotelling’s beach with linear and quadratic transportation costs: existence of pure strategy equilibria, Discussion Papers 05-09, Department of Economics, University Bern

  • García-Gallego A, Georgantzís N (2001) Multiproduct activity in an experimental differentiated oligopoly. Int J Ind Organ 19:493–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer V, Ladner K (2005) Experimentelle Untersuchung der Produktdifferenzierung auf einem geschlossenen Oligopolmarkt, Working Paper 01/2005, University of Graz

  • Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüttel K (1998) Produktpolitik, 3. Auflage, Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmen A, Thisse JF (1998) Competition in multicharacteristics spaces: Hotelling was almost right. J Econ Theory 78:76–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocher M, Sutter M (2005) The decision maker matters: individual versus group behaviour in experimental beauty-contest games. Econ J 115:200–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocher M, Strauß S, Sutter M (2006) Individual or team decision-making: causes and consequences of self-selection. Games Econ Behav 56:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Bliemel F (1995) Marketing-management. 8. Auflage, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangani A, Patelli P (2001) Experimental analysis of strategic product differentiation. LABSI Working Papers, ISSN 1825-8131

  • Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J Econ Theory 18:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepels W (2001) Produktmanagement. 3. Auflage, Oldenbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingle M, Day RH (1996) Models of economizing behavior: experimental evidence. J Econ Behav Organ 29:191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinfeldt M (1972) Product differentiation in the management game SINTO-market. In: Sauermann H (eds) Contributions to experimental economics, vol 3. Mohr J. C. B. (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, pp 521–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Schewe G (2002) Produktimitation. In: Albers S, Herrmann A (eds) Handbuch Produktmanagement, 2. Auflage, Gabler

  • Schipper BC (2002) Imitators and optimizers in symmetric n-firm Cournot oligopoly. Bonn Econ Discussion Papers no. 29/2002

  • Shaked A, Sutton J (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev Econ Stud 49:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli HB, Graves RL (1964) International operations simulation with comments on design and use of management games. The Free Press of Glencoe, Collier-Macmillan Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorf V (2002) Produktpositionierung. In: Albers S, Herrmann A (eds) Handbuch Produktmanagement, 2. Auflage, Gabler, pp 359–380

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vera Hofer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofer, V., Ladner, K. Positioning of new brands in an experiment. cent.eur.j.oper.res. 14, 435–454 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-006-0015-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-006-0015-6

Keywords

Navigation