Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A life cycle assessment of guar agriculture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Guar gum, the main product of the guar crop, is used widely in the USA as an emulsifier in the food industry and as fracturing fluid additive in the oil and gas industry. The USA is the number one global importer of guar, and interest has grown to domestically cultivate guar in the USA. Guar is an annual desert legume native to India and Pakistan. The goal of this study was to evaluate the environmental sustainability of growing guar in the USA via a life cycle analysis (LCA). The LCA helps identify the information gap for US agriculture and guide future field studies to optimize guar cultivation in the USA. This study concluded that in terms of environmental sustainability, irrigation, harvesting, and P-fertilization methods offer the most opportunity for improved guar agricultural sustainability. This is promising because one of guar’s prominent characteristics is its high water use efficiency and ability to grow in marginal soils. Lowering irrigation and water use can be implemented with simple management practice changes such as optimizing irrigation. In addition, this study shows that there is an opportunity for field trials to optimize fertilizer application rates to achieve the greatest yields. This study also found a knowledge gap with respect to carbon soil fluxes and field emissions of nitrogen and phosphorus from guar agriculture. As the USA considers adopting guar agriculture in the southwest, through research collaborations such as the USDA Sustainable Bioeconomy of Arid Regions Center of Excellence, it will be critical to evaluate irrigation to achieve maximum yields (e.g., drip, flood, sprinkler) and fill fertilizer and emissions knowledge gaps.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

Data is available upon request.

References

  • Abidi N, Liyanage S, Auld D, Norman L, Grover K, Augadi S, Singla S, Trostle C (2015) Challenges and opportunities for increasing guar production in the United States to support unconventional oil and gas production. CRC Press, London, pp 207–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander WL, Bucks DA, Backhaus RA (1988) Irrigation water management for guar seed production. Agron J 80(3):447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arayangkcon T, Schomberg HH, Weaver RW (1990) Nodulation and N2 fixation of guar at high root temperature. Plant Soil 126(2):209–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bare J (2011) TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13(5):687–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson KC, Margaret (2004). Value chain & market analysis for the australian guar industry: is guar a potential industry for the northern region of Australia? R. I. R. a. D. corporation. canberra, rural industries research and development corporation

  • Caffrey KR, Veal MW (2013) Conducting an agricultural life cycle assessment: challenges and perspectives. Sci World J 2013:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eranki PL (2017) A comparative life cycle assessment of flood and drip irrigation for guayule rubber production using experimental field data. Ind Crops Products 99:97–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gokdogan O, Seydosoglu S, Kokten K, Bengu AS, Baran MF (2017) Energy input-output analysis of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) and lupin (Lupinus albus L.) production in Turkey. Legum Res 40(3):526–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand View Research (2018. Guar gum market size, share & trends analysis by grade (Pharmaceutical, Industrial, Food), by function, by application (oil & gas, food & beverage), by region, and segment forecasts, 2025: 208

  • Gresta F, De Luca AI, Strano A, Falcone G, Santonoceto C, Anastasi U, Gulisano G (2014) Economic and environmental sustainability analysis of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) farming process in a Mediterranean area: two case studies. Italian J Agron 9(1):20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006). International Organization for Standardization 14040. Environmental Management—Lifecycle assessment—Principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland

  • Kargbo DM, Wilhelm RG, Campbell DJ (2010) Natural gas plays in the marcellus shale: challenges and potential opportunities. Environ Sci Technol 44(15):5679–5684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhns RJ, Shaw GH (2018) Navigating the energy maze. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lester Y, Yacob T, Morrissey I, Linden KG (2014) Can we treat hydraulic fracturing flowback with a conventional biological process? the case of guar gum. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1(1):133–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mpanga IK, Idowu OJ (2021) A decade of irrigation water use trends in Southwestern USA: the role of irrigation technology, best management practices, and outreach education programs. Agric Water Manag 243:106438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudgil D, Barak S, Khatkar B (2014) Guar gum: processing, properties and food applications—a review

  • Nemecek T, Kägi T (2007) Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems

  • Prasuhn V, (2006) "Erfassung der PO4-Austräge für die Ökobilanzierung SALCA Phosphor." Agroscope Reckenholzstrasse

  • Rama Rao SV, Prakash B, Raju MVLN, Panda AK, Murthy OK (2014) Effect of supplementing non-starch polysaccharide hydrolyzing enzymes in guar meal based diets on performance, carcass variables and bone mineralization in Vanaraja chicken. Anim Feed Sci Technol 188:85–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richner W., Oberholzer HR, Freiermuth R, Knuchel O, Huguenin S, Ott T, Nemecek Walther U (2006) Modell zur Beurteilung der Nitratauswaschung in Ökobilanzen –SALCA-NO3." Agroscope Reckenholzstrasse: 25

  • Singh H, Mishra D, Nahar NM (2002) Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone, India––part I. Energy Convers Manag 43(16):2275–2286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. K. (2014). An analysis of guar crop in India. Global Agricultural Information Network, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service

  • Singla S, Grover K, Angadi SV, Schutte B (2016) Guar Stand establishment, physiology, and yield responses to planting date in Southern New Mexico. Agron J 108(6):2289–2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers HM, Quinn JC (2021) Improving water scarcity footprint capabilities in arid regions through expansion of characterization factor methods. Sci Total Environ 801:149586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Summers HM, Sproul E, Seavert C, Angadi S, Robbs J, Khanal S, Gutierrez P, Teegerstrom T, Vazquez DAZ, Fan N (2021) Economic and environmental analyses of incorporating guar into the American southwest. Agric Syst 191:103146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp LLD, Boring E (1982). Keys to profitable guar production. T. A. E. service. texas agricultural experimentation station

  • Trostle C (2013) Guar in West Texas. Texas A&M AgriLife Ext

  • Weidema BP, Thrane M, Christensen P, Schmidt J, Løkke S (2008) Carbon Footprint. J Ind Ecol 12(1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assessment 21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8%3e

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding provided by the USDA-NIFA, Grant # 2017–68,005-26,867. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication/work are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The authors thank Pragnya Eranki for their support. The authors also acknowledge the Sustainable Bioeconomy for Arid Regions’ (SBAR) System Performance & Sustainability team and other collaborators within the SBAR project (http://sbar.arizona.edu/).

Funding

National institute of food and agriculture, 2017-68005-26867, Amy E. Landis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to VeeAnder S. Mealing.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 65 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mealing, V.S., Landis, A.E. A life cycle assessment of guar agriculture. Clean Techn Environ Policy (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02472-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02472-9

Keywords

Navigation