Abstract
Severe industrial pollution is puzzling human health in the world. How to reduce industrial pollution is worth to be concerned about. Some studies have verified that high-speed railways (HSRs) can directly reduce environmental pollution via green technology. However, the indirectly environmental reducing effect of the HSRs from the regulation effect perspective is rarely explored. To address this research gap, this study used information asymmetry theory and the promotion tournament theory to examine the relationship between high-speed railways (HSRs) and industrial pollution by focusing on the mediating role of environmental regulations and the moderating role of officials' political promotion incentives. Based on a sample of 113 prefecture-level cities, with balanced panel data in China from 2009 to 2017, using the difference-in-differences model, the results show that HSRs can reduce industrial pollution by 22.68% on average. The mechanism is HSRs that can improve the environmental regulation, which plays the mediating effect to further reduce industrial pollution. Additionally, high officials' political promotion incentives can strengthen this mediating effect. A propensity score matching with the difference-in-differences model and the instrumental variable method is used to solve endogenous problems, and a placebo test and a parallel trend test indicate that these results are robust. This study suggests some policy implications on developing environment-friendly transportation and improving environmental regulations to reduce industrial pollution.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Information resource: http://www.zgqxb.com.cn/zx/gj/201903/t20190314_517274.html.
Information resource: https://wiki.antpedia.com/article-2208260-210.
Information resource: http://www.chinanews.com/.
The eight indicators include disclosures of: enterprise violations, results of EPB enforcement campaigns, clean production audit information, enterprise environmental performance ratings, disposition of petitions and complaints, environmental impact assessment reports and project completion approvals, discharge fee data, and responses to public information requests.
On May 1, 2008, Open Environmental Information measures came into effect. The Ministry of Environmental Protection requires governments to disclose information on environmental laws, regulations, and standards.
Information source: http://www.zhaozhou.gov.cn/zhengminhudong/12380jubaowangzhan/faguizhidu/61733.html.
Type II error in statistics means the null hypothesis is wrong, but the judgment shows it to be true.
Abbreviations
- HSRs:
-
High-speed railways
- DID:
-
Difference-in-differences
- PSM-DID:
-
Propensity score matching with the difference-in-differences
- IPE:
-
Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs
- NRDC:
-
Natural Resources Defense Council
- PITI:
-
Pollution information transparency index
- GDP:
-
Gross domestic product
- FDI:
-
Foreign direct investment
- VIF:
-
Variance inflation factor
References
Abderrahmane B, Naima B, Tarek M, Abdelghani M (2021) Influence of highway traffic on contamination of roadside soil with heavy metals. Civ Eng J 7(8):1459–1471
Angelevska B, Atanasova V, Andreevski I (2021) Urban air quality guidance based on measures categorization in road transport. Civ Eng J Tehran 7(2):253–267
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and stastical consideration. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182
Bo Z (1996) Economic performance and political mobility: Chinese provincial leaders. J Contemp China 5(12):135–154
Chen R, Kan H, Chen B, Huang W, Bai Z, Song G, Pan G (2012) Association of particulate air pollution with daily mortality: the China air pollution and health effects study. Am J Epidemiol 175(11):1173–1181
Chen Y, Wang Y, Hu R (2020) Sustainability by high–speed rail: The reduction mechanisms of transportation infrastructure on haze pollution. Sustainability 12(2):2763
Chester M, Horvath A (2010) Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California. Environ Res Lett 136(1):123–129
Cohen MA, Santhakumar V (2007) Information disclosure as environmental regulation: a theoretical analysis. Environ Resour Econ 37(3):599–620
Costantini V, Crespi F (2008) Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecol Econ 66(2–3):447–460
D’Alfonso T, Jiang C, Bracaglia V (2016) Air transport and high-speed rail competition: environmental implications and mitigation strategies. Transp Res Pt A Policy Pract Policy Pract Digest 92A(10):261–276
DeVaro J (2006) Internal promotion competitions in firms. Rand J Econ 37(3):521–542
DiMicco JM, Hollenbach KJ, Pandolfo A, Bender W (2007) The impact of increased awareness while face-to-face. Hum Comput Interact 22(1–2):47–96
Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods 12(1):1–22
Ezirim ON, Okpoechi CU (2020) Community-driven development strategy for sustainable infrastructure. J Hum Earth Future 1(2):48–59
Fan X, Xu Y, Nan Y, Li B, Cai H (2020) Impacts of high-speed railway on the industrial pollution emissions in China. Kybernetes 49(11):2713–2735
Féres J, Reynaud A (2012) Assessing the impact of formal and informal regulations on environmental and economic performance of Brazilian manufacturing firms. Environ Resour Econ 52(1):65–85
Gioia DA, Schultz M, Corley KG (2000) Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad Manage Rev 25(1):63–81
Giorgio B (2010) Modern regression methods. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 173(1):275–275
Givoni M (2006) Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: a review. Transp Rev 26(5):593–611
Glaeser EL, Mare DC (2001) Cities and skills. J Labor Econ 19(2):316–342
Grossman SJ (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J Law Econ 24(3):461–483
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377
Guo D, Bose S, Alnes K (2017) Employment implications of stricter pollution regulation in China: theories and lessons from the USA. Environ Dev Sustain 19(2):549–569
Guo X, Sun W, Yao S, Zheng S (2020) Does high-speed railway reduce air pollution along highways? Evidence from China. Transp Res D Transp Environ 89(1):102607
Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2013) The effect of government expenditure on the environment: an empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 91:48–56
He LY, Zhang HZ (2021) Spillover or crowding out? The effects of environmental regulation on residents’ willingness to pay for environmental protection. Nat Hazards 105(1):611–630
Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd P (1998) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud 65(2):261–294
Hixson M, Mahmud A, Hu J, Kleeman MJ (2012) Resolving the interactions between population density and air pollution emissions controls in the San Joaquin Valley, USA. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 62(5):566–575
Huang R, Chen D (2015) Does environmental information disclosure benefit waste discharge reduction? Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 129(3):535–552
James LR, Brett JM (1984) Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. J Appl Psychol 69(2):307–321
Jebjerg L, Lando H (1997) Regulating a polluting firm under asymmetric information. Environ Resour Econom 10(3):267–284
Kahn ME, Li P, Zhao D (2015) Water pollution progress at borders: the role of changes in China’s political promotion incentives. Am Econ J-Econ Policy 7(4):223–242
Kathuria V (2007) Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country: evidence from India. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):403–417
Kobayashi K, Okumura M (1997) The growth of city systems with high-speed railway systems. Ann Reg Sci 31(1):39–56
Kou CW, Tsai WH (2014) “Sprinting with small steps” towards promotion: solutions for the age dilemma in the CCP cadre appointment system. J China 71:153–171
Laplante LB (2002) Incentives for pollution control: Regulation or information? J Environ Econ Manag 44:169–187
Li Q, Wang S (1998) A simple consistent bootstrap test for a parametric regression function. J Econom 87(1):145–165
Li D, Cao C, Zhang L, Chen X, Ren S, Zhao Y (2017) Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: The moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack. J Clean Prod 166:1323–1334
Lin Y (2017) Travel costs and urban specialization patterns: evidence from China’s high speed railway system. J Urban Econ 98:98–123
Lin S, Xiao L, Wang X (2020) Does air pollution hinder technological innovation in China? A perspective of innovation value chain. J Clean Prod 278(2):123326
List JA, Co CY (2000) The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. J Environ Econ Manag 40(1):1–20
Liu Q, Li L (2019) Spatial heterogeneity of government regulation, spatial distance and enterprise carbon information disclosure: an analysis based on the heavy pollution industry in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(23):4777–4792
Managi S, Kaneko S (2009) Environmental performance and returns to pollution abatement in China. Ecol Econ 68(6):1643–1651
Matthew A, Cole R, Shimamoto K (2005) Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution in a developing country: an analysis of the Chinese manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manag 50:121–143
Mayer H (1999) Air pollution in cities. Atmos Environ 33(24–25):4029–4037
Miao CL, Meng XN, Duan MM, Wu XY (2020) Energy consumption, environmental pollution, and technological innovation efficiency: taking industrial enterprises in China as empirical analysis object. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(27):34147–34157
Millimet DL, Roy J (2016) Empirical tests of the pollution haven hypothesis when environmental regulation is endogenous. J Appl Econom 31(4):652–677
Qi Y, Lu H, Zhang N (2019) Will environmental regulation help reduce pollution and improve efficiency? A New Era 237–268
Rohde RA, Muller RA (2015) Air pollution in China: mapping of concentrations and sources. PLoS ONE 10(8):0135749
Shen J, Wei YD, Yang Z (2017) The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China. J Clean Prod 148:785–794
Silajdzic S, Mehic E (2017) The impact of environmental taxes on competitive performance of pollution-intensive industries among transition economies: evidence from panel analysis. Financ Environ Bus Dev 4:155–169
Tang J (2015) Testing the pollution haven effect: does the type of FDI matter? Environ Resour Econ 60(4):549–578
Tu Z, Hu T, Shen R (2019) Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: evidence from PITI disclosure. China Econ Rev 55:111–123
Vickerman R (2018) Can high-speed rail have a transformative effect on the economy? Transp Policy 62:31–37
Wang H, Liu H (2019) Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and environmental pollution: an empirical study based on threshold effects for different Chinese regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):5394–5409
Wang S, Zhou H (2020) Hua G (2020) Is the high-speed rail opening environmentally friendly? Taking the difference-in-differences test in Jiangsu. China Complex 47:147–151
Yan X, Jiang P (2018) Effect of the dynamics of human behavior on the competitive spreading of information. Comput Hum Behav 89:1–7
Yang X, Lin S, Li Y, He M (2019) Can high-speed rail reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 239:118135
Yue Y, Wang T, Liang S, Yang J, Hou P, Qu S, Xu M (2015) Life cycle assessment of high speed rail in China. Transp Res D Transp Environ 41:367–376
Zhang L, Mol AP, He G (2016) Transparency and information disclosure in China’s environmental governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 18:17–24
Zhang H, Xiong L, Li L, Zhang S (2018) Political incentives, transformation efficiency and resource-exhausted cities. J Clean Prod 196:1418–1428
Zhang M, Liu X, Ding Y (2021) Assessing the influence of urban transportation infrastructure construction on haze pollution in China: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Environ Impact Assess Rev 87(2):106547
Zhao L, Zhang X, Zhao F (2020) Evaluating the impact of high-speed rail on county-level air quality in China. Transp Res D Transp Environ 86:102485
Zheng S, Kahn ME, Sun W, Luo D (2014) Incentives for China’s urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: The role of the central government and public environmentalism. Region Sci Urban Econ 47:61–71
Zhou Q, Zeng J (2018) Promotion incentives, GDP manipulation and economic growth in China: how does sub-national officials behave when they have performance pressure? Soc Sci Electron Publish. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3269645
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 72002144).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LL designed and drafted the manuscript. YW and QC supported the data collection. JW advised on manuscript submission. XJ revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Chen, Q., Wang, Y. et al. Mechanisms of high-speed railways’ reducing industrial pollution: regulations and officials’ political promotion incentives. Clean Techn Environ Policy 24, 1469–1485 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02259-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02259-w