Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mechanisms of high-speed railways’ reducing industrial pollution: regulations and officials’ political promotion incentives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Severe industrial pollution is puzzling human health in the world. How to reduce industrial pollution is worth to be concerned about. Some studies have verified that high-speed railways (HSRs) can directly reduce environmental pollution via green technology. However, the indirectly environmental reducing effect of the HSRs from the regulation effect perspective is rarely explored. To address this research gap, this study used information asymmetry theory and the promotion tournament theory to examine the relationship between high-speed railways (HSRs) and industrial pollution by focusing on the mediating role of environmental regulations and the moderating role of officials' political promotion incentives. Based on a sample of 113 prefecture-level cities, with balanced panel data in China from 2009 to 2017, using the difference-in-differences model, the results show that HSRs can reduce industrial pollution by 22.68% on average. The mechanism is HSRs that can improve the environmental regulation, which plays the mediating effect to further reduce industrial pollution. Additionally, high officials' political promotion incentives can strengthen this mediating effect. A propensity score matching with the difference-in-differences model and the instrumental variable method is used to solve endogenous problems, and a placebo test and a parallel trend test indicate that these results are robust. This study suggests some policy implications on developing environment-friendly transportation and improving environmental regulations to reduce industrial pollution.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Information resource: http://www.zgqxb.com.cn/zx/gj/201903/t20190314_517274.html.

  2. Information resource: https://wiki.antpedia.com/article-2208260-210.

  3. Information resource: http://www.chinanews.com/.

  4. The eight indicators include disclosures of: enterprise violations, results of EPB enforcement campaigns, clean production audit information, enterprise environmental performance ratings, disposition of petitions and complaints, environmental impact assessment reports and project completion approvals, discharge fee data, and responses to public information requests.

  5. On May 1, 2008, Open Environmental Information measures came into effect. The Ministry of Environmental Protection requires governments to disclose information on environmental laws, regulations, and standards.

  6. Information source: http://www.zhaozhou.gov.cn/zhengminhudong/12380jubaowangzhan/faguizhidu/61733.html.

  7. Type II error in statistics means the null hypothesis is wrong, but the judgment shows it to be true.

Abbreviations

HSRs:

High-speed railways

DID:

Difference-in-differences

PSM-DID:

Propensity score matching with the difference-in-differences

IPE:

Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs

NRDC:

Natural Resources Defense Council

PITI:

Pollution information transparency index

GDP:

Gross domestic product

FDI:

Foreign direct investment

VIF:

Variance inflation factor

References

  • Abderrahmane B, Naima B, Tarek M, Abdelghani M (2021) Influence of highway traffic on contamination of roadside soil with heavy metals. Civ Eng J 7(8):1459–1471

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelevska B, Atanasova V, Andreevski I (2021) Urban air quality guidance based on measures categorization in road transport. Civ Eng J Tehran 7(2):253–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and stastical consideration. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bo Z (1996) Economic performance and political mobility: Chinese provincial leaders. J Contemp China 5(12):135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Kan H, Chen B, Huang W, Bai Z, Song G, Pan G (2012) Association of particulate air pollution with daily mortality: the China air pollution and health effects study. Am J Epidemiol 175(11):1173–1181

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Wang Y, Hu R (2020) Sustainability by high–speed rail: The reduction mechanisms of transportation infrastructure on haze pollution. Sustainability 12(2):2763

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester M, Horvath A (2010) Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California. Environ Res Lett 136(1):123–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MA, Santhakumar V (2007) Information disclosure as environmental regulation: a theoretical analysis. Environ Resour Econ 37(3):599–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Crespi F (2008) Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecol Econ 66(2–3):447–460

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alfonso T, Jiang C, Bracaglia V (2016) Air transport and high-speed rail competition: environmental implications and mitigation strategies. Transp Res Pt A Policy Pract Policy Pract Digest 92A(10):261–276

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVaro J (2006) Internal promotion competitions in firms. Rand J Econ 37(3):521–542

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMicco JM, Hollenbach KJ, Pandolfo A, Bender W (2007) The impact of increased awareness while face-to-face. Hum Comput Interact 22(1–2):47–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods 12(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezirim ON, Okpoechi CU (2020) Community-driven development strategy for sustainable infrastructure. J Hum Earth Future 1(2):48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Xu Y, Nan Y, Li B, Cai H (2020) Impacts of high-speed railway on the industrial pollution emissions in China. Kybernetes 49(11):2713–2735

    Google Scholar 

  • Féres J, Reynaud A (2012) Assessing the impact of formal and informal regulations on environmental and economic performance of Brazilian manufacturing firms. Environ Resour Econ 52(1):65–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia DA, Schultz M, Corley KG (2000) Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad Manage Rev 25(1):63–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgio B (2010) Modern regression methods. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 173(1):275–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Givoni M (2006) Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: a review. Transp Rev 26(5):593–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Mare DC (2001) Cities and skills. J Labor Econ 19(2):316–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman SJ (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J Law Econ 24(3):461–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo D, Bose S, Alnes K (2017) Employment implications of stricter pollution regulation in China: theories and lessons from the USA. Environ Dev Sustain 19(2):549–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Sun W, Yao S, Zheng S (2020) Does high-speed railway reduce air pollution along highways? Evidence from China. Transp Res D Transp Environ 89(1):102607

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Paizanos EΑ (2013) The effect of government expenditure on the environment: an empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 91:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • He LY, Zhang HZ (2021) Spillover or crowding out? The effects of environmental regulation on residents’ willingness to pay for environmental protection. Nat Hazards 105(1):611–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd P (1998) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud 65(2):261–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixson M, Mahmud A, Hu J, Kleeman MJ (2012) Resolving the interactions between population density and air pollution emissions controls in the San Joaquin Valley, USA. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 62(5):566–575

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Chen D (2015) Does environmental information disclosure benefit waste discharge reduction? Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 129(3):535–552

    Google Scholar 

  • James LR, Brett JM (1984) Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. J Appl Psychol 69(2):307–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Jebjerg L, Lando H (1997) Regulating a polluting firm under asymmetric information. Environ Resour Econom 10(3):267–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn ME, Li P, Zhao D (2015) Water pollution progress at borders: the role of changes in China’s political promotion incentives. Am Econ J-Econ Policy 7(4):223–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria V (2007) Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country: evidence from India. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):403–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi K, Okumura M (1997) The growth of city systems with high-speed railway systems. Ann Reg Sci 31(1):39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kou CW, Tsai WH (2014) “Sprinting with small steps” towards promotion: solutions for the age dilemma in the CCP cadre appointment system. J China 71:153–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplante LB (2002) Incentives for pollution control: Regulation or information? J Environ Econ Manag 44:169–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Wang S (1998) A simple consistent bootstrap test for a parametric regression function. J Econom 87(1):145–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Cao C, Zhang L, Chen X, Ren S, Zhao Y (2017) Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: The moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack. J Clean Prod 166:1323–1334

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y (2017) Travel costs and urban specialization patterns: evidence from China’s high speed railway system. J Urban Econ 98:98–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Xiao L, Wang X (2020) Does air pollution hinder technological innovation in China? A perspective of innovation value chain. J Clean Prod 278(2):123326

    Google Scholar 

  • List JA, Co CY (2000) The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. J Environ Econ Manag 40(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Li L (2019) Spatial heterogeneity of government regulation, spatial distance and enterprise carbon information disclosure: an analysis based on the heavy pollution industry in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(23):4777–4792

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Managi S, Kaneko S (2009) Environmental performance and returns to pollution abatement in China. Ecol Econ 68(6):1643–1651

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew A, Cole R, Shimamoto K (2005) Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution in a developing country: an analysis of the Chinese manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manag 50:121–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H (1999) Air pollution in cities. Atmos Environ 33(24–25):4029–4037

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miao CL, Meng XN, Duan MM, Wu XY (2020) Energy consumption, environmental pollution, and technological innovation efficiency: taking industrial enterprises in China as empirical analysis object. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(27):34147–34157

    Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL, Roy J (2016) Empirical tests of the pollution haven hypothesis when environmental regulation is endogenous. J Appl Econom 31(4):652–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Lu H, Zhang N (2019) Will environmental regulation help reduce pollution and improve efficiency? A New Era 237–268

  • Rohde RA, Muller RA (2015) Air pollution in China: mapping of concentrations and sources. PLoS ONE 10(8):0135749

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Wei YD, Yang Z (2017) The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China. J Clean Prod 148:785–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Silajdzic S, Mehic E (2017) The impact of environmental taxes on competitive performance of pollution-intensive industries among transition economies: evidence from panel analysis. Financ Environ Bus Dev 4:155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang J (2015) Testing the pollution haven effect: does the type of FDI matter? Environ Resour Econ 60(4):549–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu Z, Hu T, Shen R (2019) Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: evidence from PITI disclosure. China Econ Rev 55:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickerman R (2018) Can high-speed rail have a transformative effect on the economy? Transp Policy 62:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu H (2019) Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and environmental pollution: an empirical study based on threshold effects for different Chinese regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):5394–5409

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhou H (2020) Hua G (2020) Is the high-speed rail opening environmentally friendly? Taking the difference-in-differences test in Jiangsu. China Complex 47:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan X, Jiang P (2018) Effect of the dynamics of human behavior on the competitive spreading of information. Comput Hum Behav 89:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Lin S, Li Y, He M (2019) Can high-speed rail reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 239:118135

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Y, Wang T, Liang S, Yang J, Hou P, Qu S, Xu M (2015) Life cycle assessment of high speed rail in China. Transp Res D Transp Environ 41:367–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Mol AP, He G (2016) Transparency and information disclosure in China’s environmental governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 18:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Xiong L, Li L, Zhang S (2018) Political incentives, transformation efficiency and resource-exhausted cities. J Clean Prod 196:1418–1428

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Liu X, Ding Y (2021) Assessing the influence of urban transportation infrastructure construction on haze pollution in China: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Environ Impact Assess Rev 87(2):106547

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Zhang X, Zhao F (2020) Evaluating the impact of high-speed rail on county-level air quality in China. Transp Res D Transp Environ 86:102485

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Kahn ME, Sun W, Luo D (2014) Incentives for China’s urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: The role of the central government and public environmentalism. Region Sci Urban Econ 47:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Zeng J (2018) Promotion incentives, GDP manipulation and economic growth in China: how does sub-national officials behave when they have performance pressure? Soc Sci Electron Publish. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3269645

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 72002144).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LL designed and drafted the manuscript. YW and QC supported the data collection. JW advised on manuscript submission. XJ revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ximeng Jia.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Chen, Q., Wang, Y. et al. Mechanisms of high-speed railways’ reducing industrial pollution: regulations and officials’ political promotion incentives. Clean Techn Environ Policy 24, 1469–1485 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02259-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02259-w

Keywords

Navigation