Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analyzing interrelationships among environmental sustainability innovation factors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to growing public awareness, governmental regulations and concerns, environmental sustainability initiatives have received increasing attention among industrial decision-makers and practitioners. Employing environmental management programs can significantly minimize the waste and preserve the environment. However, papers have not much focused on exploring the interactions and interdependencies among environmental sustainability innovation factors, particularly in the context of manufacturing sector of emerging economies. To address this issue, this paper proposes a criteria decision framework, with the target of investigating the interactions among environmental sustainability innovation criteria within an emerging economy nation manufacturing sector context using Z-based DEMATEL technique. According to the findings, “designing products for being reusable and energy-efficient” is the most critical criterion and requires a considerable attention for successfully implementing environmental sustainability innovation. This paper significantly helps industrial managers and experts in emerging economies to better understand environmental sustainability innovation, employ environmental sustainability innovation practices in their supply chains and shift their industry toward sustainable development.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboutorab H, Saberi M, Asadabadi MR, Hussain O, Chang E (2018) ZBWM: the Z-number extension of best worst method and its application for supplier development. Expert Syst Appl 107:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadeh A, Saberi M, Atashbar N Z, Chang E, Pazhoheshfar P (2013) Z-AHP: a Z-number extension of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. In: 7th IEEE international conference, pp 141–147

  • Bai C, Kusi-Sarpong S, Badri Ahmadi H, Sarkis J (2019) Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decision-support approach. Int J Prod Res 57(22):7046–7067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsatto JMLS, Amui LBL (2019) Green innovation: unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resour Conserv Recycl 149:445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in NEW product development. Organ Sci 13(4):442–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter CR, Hatton MR, Wu C, Chen X (2019) Sustainable supply chain management: continuing evolution and future directions. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 50(1):122–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Lai SB, Wen CT (2006) The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 67(4):331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou TY, Chan HK, Lettice F, Chung SH (2011) The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 47(6):822–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Medeiros JF, Ribeiro JLD, Cortimiglia MN (2014) Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 65:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Medeiros JF, Ribeiro JLD, Cortimiglia MN (2016) Influence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in Brazil. J Clean Prod 110:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vargas MG, Finocchio CPS, Barichello R, Pedrozo EA (2018) Sustainability and innovation in the Brazilian supply chain of green plastic. J Clean Prod 177:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabus A, Fontela E (1972) World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Jha PC, Agarwal V, Darbari JD (2019) Environmental management partner selection for reverse supply chain collaboration: a sustainable approach. J Environ Manag 236:784–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta H, Kusi-Sarpong S, Rezaei J (2020) Barriers and overcoming strategies to supply chain sustainability innovation. Resour Conserv Recycl 161:104819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iles A, Martin AN (2013) Expanding bioplastics production: sustainable business innovation in the chemical industry. J Clean Prod 45:38–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan D, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Jabbour CJC (2014) Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. Eur J Oper Res 233(2):432–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Arundel A, Smith K (2001) Survey indicators for environmental innovation (paper presented to conference “Towards Environmental Innovation Systems” in Garmisch-Partenkirchen)

  • Klewitz J, Hansen EG (2014) Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 65:57–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusi-Sarpong S, Gupta H, Sarkis J (2019) A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology. Int J Prod Res 57(7):1990–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H (2012) Cross-sector alliances for corporate social responsibility partner heterogeneity moderates environmental strategy outcomes. J Bus Ethics 110(2):219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJ, Yen L, Tzeng GH (2008) Building an effective safety management system for airlines. J Air Transp Manag 14(1):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo HW, Shiue W, Liou JJ, Tzeng GH (2020) A hybrid MCDM-based FMEA model for identification of critical failure modes in manufacturing. Soft Comput 24:15733–15745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthra S, Mangla SK (2018) When strategies matter: adoption of sustainable supply chain management practices in an emerging economy’s context. Resour Conserv Recycl 138:194–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthra S, Govindan K, Kannan D, Mangla SK, Garg CP (2017) An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J Clean Prod 140:1686–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiyazhagan K, Govindan K, NoorulHaq A, Geng Y (2013) An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 47:283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi S, Bossink B (2020) Corporate-NGO partnership for environmentally sustainable innovation: lessons from a cross-sector collaboration in aviation biofuels. Environ Innov Soc Trans 34:80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Gouldson A (2000) Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. Geoforum 31(1):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Dyn Eco-eff Econ Environ Regul Compet Adv 33

  • Saeed MA, Kersten W (2019) Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: identification and classification. Sustainability 11(4):1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad M, Qu Y, Javed SA, Zafar AU, Rehman SU (2020) Relation of environment sustainability to CSR and green innovation: a case of Pakistani manufacturing industry. J Clean Prod 253:119938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen KW, Wang JQ (2018) Z-VIKOR method based on a new comprehensive weighted distance measure of Z-number and its application. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3232–3245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva GM, Gomes PJ, Sarkis J (2019) The role of innovation in the implementation of green supply chain management practices. Bus Strateg Environ 28(5):819–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre BS, Ţîrcă DM (2019) Innovations for sustainable development: moving toward a sustainable future. J Clean Prod 208:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tariq A, Badir YF, Tariq W, Bhutta US (2017) Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: a systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook. Technol Soc 51:8–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J, Bessant JR (2018) Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Todeschini BV, Cortimiglia MN, de Medeiros JF (2020) Collaboration practices in the fashion industry: environmentally sustainable innovations in the value chain. Environ Sci Policy 106:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toke LK, Kalpande SD (2019) Critical success factors of green manufacturing for achieving sustainability in Indian context. Int J Sustain Eng 12(6):415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan R (2017) Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. J Acad Mark Sci 45(1):14–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilenko L, Arbačiauskas V (2013) Obstacles and drivers for sustainable innovation development and implementation in small and medium sized enterprises. Aplinkos tyrimai, inžinerija ir vadyba 2:58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong WP, Tseng ML, Tan KH (2014) A business process management capabilities perspective on organisation performance. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 25(5–6):602–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Ahmad J, Xu J (2016) A group decision making framework based on fuzzy VIKOR approach for machine tool selection with linguistic information. Appl Soft Comput 42:314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaakob AM, Gegov A (2016) Interactive TOPSIS based group decision making methodology using Z-numbers. Int J Comput Intell Syst 9(2):311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Han Q, Zhou J, Yuan C (2015) The influence of environmental management practices and supply chain integration on technological innovation performance—evidence from China’s manufacturing industry. Sustainability 7(11):15342–15361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yew WL, Zhu Z (2019) Innovative autocrats? Environmental innovation in public participation in China and Malaysia. J Environ Manag 234:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (2011) A note on Z-numbers. Inf Sci 181(14):2923–2932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai KH (2012) Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: an ecological modernization perspective. J Eng Technol Manag 29(1):168–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James J. H. Liou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badri Ahmadi, H., Lo, HW., Gupta, H. et al. Analyzing interrelationships among environmental sustainability innovation factors. Clean Techn Environ Policy 24, 1191–1207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02086-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02086-z

Keywords

Navigation