The concerns about climate change, energy security and price fluctuation of fossil fuels are driving the growing interest in the development and utilization of renewable energy as a transportation fuel. In this aspect, the utilization of organic household waste for the production of biogas avoids the environmental impact of landfills. The further upgrading and utilization of biogas as a vehicle fuel avoids the environmental impact of fossil fuels. This paper presents the life cycle assessment of two utilization pathways of biogas produced from co-digestion of organic household waste, grease trap removal sludge and ley crops grown by local farmers. Specifically, this study assessed and compared the environmental impact of the production and utilization of bio-methane and biogas-based electricity as a vehicle fuel for public transport buses in Västerås, Sweden. The system boundary for biogas production covered seven main steps: cultivation, harvesting and transport of ley crops, collection and transport of waste, pre-treatment and co-digestion of the substrate. The system boundary for bio-methane was further extended to account for the upgrading process and tailpipe emissions from combustion of bio-methane in the buses. In the case of biogas-based electricity, the system boundary was further extended to account for the combustion of biogas in the CHP unit and further utilization of electricity in the electric bus. The evaluation of the production routes showed that the methane losses and high energy consumption for both biogas production and upgrading process dominated the environmental impact of bio-methane production. However, the emissions from the CHP unit were solely responsible for the environmental impact of biogas-based electricity production. The functional unit identified for this study is 1 vehicle km travelled (VKT) of the bio-methane fuelled bus and electric bus. The global warming potential of the electric buses was 0.11 kg CO2-eq/VKT compared to 0.26 kg CO2-eq/VKT for the bio-methane buses. The electric buses could also reduce about half of the acidification and eutrophication impacts associated with the bio-methane fuelled buses. The lower fuel efficiency and high tailpipe emissions decreased the environmental advantages of the bio-methane buses. Eventually, this study ensures the biogas utilization which is environmentally sound and compares favourably with the alternative options.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bedoić R, Čuček L, Ćosić B, Krajnc D, Smoljanić G, Kravanja Z, Ljubas D, Pukšec T, Duić N (2019) Green biomass to biogas—a study on anaerobic digestion of residue grass. J Clean Prod 213:700–709
Börjesson P, Tufvesson L, Lantz M (2010) Life cycle assessment of biofuels in Sweden. Department of Technology and Society, Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Report No 70, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Borjesson P, Tufvesson L (2011) Agricultural crop-based biofuels—resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. 19, 108–120
Borjesson P, Prade T, Lantz M, Borjesson L (2015) Energy crop-based biogas as vehicle fuel-the impact of crop selection on energy efficiency and greenhouse gas performance. Energies 8:6033–6058
Boulamanti AK, Donida MS, Giuntoli J, Agostini A (2013) Influence of different practices on biogas sustainability. Biomass Bioenergy 53:149–161
Buhle L, Stulpnagel R, Wachendorf M (2011) Comparative life cycle assessment of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) and whole crop digestion (WCD) in Germany
Chester M, Horvath A (2009) Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains. Environ Res Lett 4:024008
Fusi A, Becenetti J, Fiala M, Azapagic A (2016) Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 4:1–17
Gissen C, Prade T, Kreuger E, Nges IA, Rosenquist H, Snensson S, Lantz M, Mattson JE, Borjesson P, Borjesson L (2014) Comparing energy crops for biogas production—yields, energy input and costs in cultivation using digestate and mineral fertilisation. Biomass Bioenerg 64:199–210
Enrique AH, Hector A, Gómez JA, Gómez-Méndez M, Pérez-Hernández A (2019) Biogas power energy production from a life cycle thinking. New Front Life Cycle Assess Theory Appl. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82250
Florio C, Fiorentino G, Corcelli F, Ulgiati S, Dumontet S, Güsewell J, Eltrop L (2019) A life cycle assessment of biomethane production from waste feedstock through different upgrading technologies. Energies 12:718
Gogolek P (2012) Methane emission factors for biogas flares. Article number 201203 Industrial Combustion, Journal of the International Flame Research Foundation
Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn JA, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Series: ecoefficiency in industry and science. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Guerini Filho M, Steinmetz RLR, Bezama A et al (2019) Biomass availability assessment for biogas or methane production in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:1353–1366
Huopana T, Freidank T, Thorin E, Lindmark J, Harri N, Mikko K, Jääskeläinen A (2014) Biomethane production from fine MSW fraction in Västerås: assessment in material, energy and greenhouse gas balance point of view. Implementing advanced concepts in biological utilization of waste. University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
Hijazi O, Munro S, Zerhusen B, Effenberger M (2016) Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1291–1300
Kyto M, Murtonen T (2012) Bus emission measurements on chassis dynamometer. Baltic Biogas Project, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Korpela T, Kaivosoja J, Majanne Y, Laakkonen L, Nurmoranta M, Vilkko M (2016) Utilization of district heating networks to provide flexibility in CHP production. Energy Procedia 116:310–319
Lantz M (2012) The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden—a comparison of different CHP technologies. Appl Energy 98:502–511
Lask J, Guajardo AM, Weik J, von Cossel M, Lewandowski I, Wagner M (2020) Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of biogas production from perennial wild plant mixtures and maize (Zea mays L.) in southwest Germany. GCB Bioenergy 12
Lorenzi G, Gorgoroni M, Silva C, Santarelli M (2018) Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading routes. Energy Procedia 158:2012–2018
Lyng K, Andreas B (2019) Environmental life cycle assessment of biogas as a fuel for transport compared with alternative fuels. Energies 12:532
Mezzullo WG, McManus MC, Hammond GP (2013) Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste. Appl Energy 102:657–664
Morero B, Groppelli E, Campanella EA (2015) Life cycle assessment of biomethane use in Argentina. Biores Technol 182:208–216
Markou G, Brulé M, Balafoutis A et al (2017) Biogas production from energy crops in northern Greece: economics of electricity generation associated with heat recovery in a greenhouse. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:1147–1167
Nielsen M, Nielsen O, Plejdrup M (2014) Danish Emission Inventories for Stationary Combustion Plants: Inventories until 2011, Scientific Report from Danish Centre for Environment and Energy
Nielsen M, Nielsen O, Thomsen M (2010) Emissions from decentralized CHP plants. Emission factors and emission inventory for decentralized CHP production, Technical Report from National Environmental Research Institute
Papong S, Rotwiroon P, Chatchupong T, Malakul P (2014) Life cycle energy and environmental assessment of bio-CNG utilization from cassava starch wastewater treatment plants in Thailand. Renew Energy 65:64–69
Shinde AM, Dikshit AK, Singh RK, Campana PE (2018) Life cycle analysis based comprehensive environmental performance evaluation of Mumbai Suburban Railway, India. J Clean Prod 188:989–1003
Shinde AM, Dikshit AK, Singh RK (2019) Comparison of life cycle environmental performance of public road transport modes in metropolitan regions. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:605
Stucki M, Jungbluth N, Leuenberger M (2011) Life cycle assessment of biogas production from different substrates. ESU-services GmbH fair consulting in sustainability Kanzleistrasse, Uster
Swedish Biogas Association (2020). Statistics on biogas production. http://www.energigas.se/fakta-om-gas/biogas/statistik-om-biogas/
Sharvini SR, Noor ZZ, Chong CS, Stringer LC, Glew D (2020) Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: a life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies. Energy 191:116513
University of Leiden (2001) Centre for Environmental Studies: CML 2001 Characterization Method. http://www.cml.leiden.edu/
Vassileva I, Campillo J, Schwede S (2017) Technology assessment of the two most relevant aspects for improving urban energy efficiency identified in six mid-sized European cities from case studies in Sweden. Appl Energy 194:808–818
Wang X, Nordlander E, Thorin E, Yan J (2013) Microalgal biomethane production integrated with an existing biogas plant: a case study in Sweden. Appl Energy 112:478–484
Zhang C, Qiu L (2018) Comprehensive sustainability assessment of a biogas-linked agro-ecosystem: a case study in China. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:1847–1860
Authors sincerely thank the management and the staff of Växtkraft Biogas Plant at Västerås, Sweden for providing the data needed for carrying out the present research study. The first author would like to acknowledge The Foundation of Gustav Dahl as the present study was supported by the Gustav Dahl Scholarship, Malardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
The first author would like to acknowledge The Foundation of Gustav Dahl as the present study was supported by the Gustav Dahl Scholarship, Malardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Shinde, A.M., Dikshit, A.K., Odlare, M. et al. Life cycle assessment of bio-methane and biogas-based electricity production from organic waste for utilization as a vehicle fuel. Clean Techn Environ Policy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02054-7
- Biogas-based electricity
- Electric bus
- Life cycle assessment