Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does income inequality affect direct and indirect household CO2 emissions? A quantile regression approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Income inequality plays as a driver of direct and indirect CO2 emissions from the household sector. Existing research has done a lot of work on the accounting methods and influencing factors of household direct CO2 emissions and indirect CO2 emissions. There are few studies on the impact of income inequality on direct and indirect household CO2 emissions under different emission levels. This research investigates the impact of income inequality on both direct and indirect CO2 emissions of 30 provinces in China from 2000 to 2015 using the STIRPAT model and panel quantile regression method. Theil index is selected to measure income inequality, population, per capita consumption level, energy intensity, urbanization, and industrial structure as control variables. The results indicate that the level of regional inequality is gradually increasing from the east to the west. The household indirect CO2 emissions in the east increased fastest, while the household direct CO2 emissions in the west increased fastest. Income inequality significantly promoted direct CO2 emissions under all quantile levels, while the impact on indirect CO2 emissions is not significant. Population and per capita consumption will promote direct and indirect CO2 emissions. Urbanization has no significant impact on direct CO2 emissions. Only at the 90th percentile level is there a significant negative correlation between energy intensity and indirect CO2 emissions. Industrial structure significantly increases direct CO2 emissions at the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles, while the impact on indirect CO2 emissions is not significant.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auffhammer M, Carson RT (2008) Forecasting the path of China’s CO2 emissions using province-level information. J Environ Econ Manag 55(3):229–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek J, Gweisah G (2013) Does income inequality harm the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Energy Policy 62:1434–1437

    Google Scholar 

  • Baloch MA, Danish Khan U D et al (2020) Analyzing the relationship between poverty, income inequality, and CO2 emission in Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 740:139867

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bin S, Dowlatabadi H (2005) Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions. Energy policy 33(2):197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce JK (1994) Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecol Econ 11(3):169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce JK (2007) Is inequality bad for the environment? Res Soc Probl Public Policy 15:267–288

  • Boyce JK, Klemer AR, Templet PH et al (1999) Power distribution, the environment, and public health: a state-level analysis. Ecol Econ 29(1):127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(1):175–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Q, Cai W, Wang C (2017) Impact of household consumption activities on energy consumption in China—evidence from the lifestyle perspective and input-output analysis. Energy Procedia 105:3384–3390

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong XY, Hao Y (2018) Would income inequality affect electricity consumption? Evidence from China. Energy 142:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabo A (2010) Impact of income inequality on health: does environment quality matter? Work Pap 43(1):146–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of Population Growth. Science 171(3977):1212–1217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Guo X, Marinova D et al (2012) Embedded carbon footprint of Chinese urban households: structure and changes. J Clean Prod 33:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng ZH, Zou LL, Wei YM (2011) The impact of household consumption on energy use and CO2 emissions in China. Energy 36(1):656–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Chen W, Liu Z et al (2017) A bibliometric review: energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the residential sector. J Clean Product 159:301–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley J, Meng X (2012) Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: the case of Chinese urban households. Energy Econ 34(6):1864–1872

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravier-Rymaszewska J, Tyrowicz J, Kochanowicz J (2010) Intra-provincial inequalities and economic growth in China. Econ Syst 34(3):237–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald N, Klasen S, Martinez-Zarzoso I et al (2017) The trade-off between income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions. Ecol Econ 142(12):249–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo L (2014) CO2 emissions and regional income disparity: evidence from China. Singap Econ Rev 59(1):1450007

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Chen H, Zhang Q (2016) Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Ecol Indic 67:533–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerink N, Mulatu A, Bulte E (2001) Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ 38(3):359–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Jiang KS (2013) An analysis of the dynamic characteristics and the influential factors of carbon emissions from residential consumptions in China. Syst Eng 63(1):52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K et al (2017) Global carbon inequality. Energy Ecol Environ 2(6):361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006) IPCC third assessment report: climate change 2006. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasuga H, Takaya M (2016) Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities. J Clean Prod 142(4):3689–3701

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight KW, Schor JB, Jorgenson AK (2017) Wealth inequality and carbon emissions in high-income countries. Soc Curr 4(5):403–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G Jr (1978) Regression quantiles. J Econom Soc, Econom, pp 33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusumawardani D, Dewi AK (2020) The effect of income inequality on carbon dioxide emissions: a case study of Indonesia. Heliyon 6(8):e04772

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy JI, Woo MK, Tebbens RD et al (2018) Emission payback periods for increased residential insulation using marginal electricity modeling: a life cycle approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(9):1723–1734

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhao R, Liu T et al (2015) Does urbanization lead to more direct and indirect household carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from China during 1996–2012. J Clean Prod 102:103–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Wu S, Lei Y et al (2019) Dynamic features and driving forces of indirect CO2 emissions from Chinese household: a comparative and mitigation strategies analysis. Sci Total Environ 704:135367

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle B (2013) Urban density and climate change: a STIRPAT analysis using city-level data. J Transp Geogr 28(3):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HH, Li FF (2013) Income distribution, consumption demand and economic growth: the perspective of dynamic coupling. China Soft Sci 12:7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long Y, Yoshida Y, Dong L (2017) Exploring the indirect household carbon emissions by source: analysis on 49 Japanese cities. J Clean Prod 167(20):571–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongelli I, Tassielli G, Notarnicola B (2006) Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy 34(1):88–100

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2000–2015a). China Energy Statistical Yearbooks. China Statistical Press, Beijing.

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC), (2000–2015b). China Statistical Yearbooks. China Statistical Press, Beijing.

  • National Development, Reform Commission Energy Research Institute (2003) China Sustainable Energy and carbon emissions scenario analysis 24–26

  • Poruschi L, Ambrey CL (2016) On the confluence of city living, energy saving behaviours and direct residential energy consumption. Environ Sci Policy 66:334–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu B, Zhang Y (2011) Effect of income distribution on the environmental Kuznets curve. Pac Econ Rev 16(3):349–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu J, Zeng J, Li Y et al (2013) Household carbon dioxide emissions from peasants and herdsmen in northwestern arid-alpine regions. China Energy Policy 57(6):133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion M, Heil M, Jalan J (2000) Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxf Econ Pap 52(4):651–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanches-Pereira A, Tudeschini LG, Coelho ST (2016) Evolution of the Brazilian residential carbon footprint based on direct energy consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:184–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil H (1967) Economics and information theory. NorthHolland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin MM, Mishra V, Smyth R (2020) Income inequality and CO2 emissions in the G7, 1870–2014: Evidence from non-parametric modelling. Energy Econ 2020:104780

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T (1973) The theory of the leisure class. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Ouyang Z (2008) The threshold effect of the urban-rural income disparity on real economic growth in China. Soc Sci China 29(3):39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Yang L (2014) Indirect carbon emissions in household consumption: evidence from the urban and rural area in China. J Clean Prod 78:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Kang Y, Wang J et al (2017) Panel estimation for the impacts of population-related factors on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Ecol Indic 78:322–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Chen W, Kang Y et al (2018) Spatial correlation of factors affecting CO2 emission at provincial level in China: A geographically weighted regression approach. J Clean Prod 184:929–937

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhao M, Chen W (2018) Spatial effect of factors affecting household CO2 emissions at the provincial level in China: a geographically weighted regression model. Carbon Manag 9(2):187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber C, Perrels A (2000) Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions. Energy Policy 28(8):549–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei YM, Liu LC, Fan Y et al (2007) The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2 emission: an empirical analysis of China’s residents. Energy Policy 35(1):247–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing CT, John E, Rob G (2019) The dynamics of income inequality: the case of China in a comparative perspective. Eur Socio Rev 35:431–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Zhou X (2014) Income inequality in today’s China. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(19):6928–6933

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xue L, Liu B, Qi SF (2011) Rebound Effect and Its Impact on Policies of Energy-saving and Emission Reduction. China Popul Resour Environ 21(10):55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Wu S, Cheung HY (2017) From income and housing wealth inequalities to emissions inequality: carbon emissions of households in China. J Hous Built Environ 32(2):231–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye H, Ren Q, Hu X et al (2017) Low-carbon behavior approaches for reducing direct carbon emissions: Household energy use in a coastal city. J Clean Prod 141:128–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • York R (2008) De-carbonization in former soviet republics, 1992–2000: the ecological consequences of de-modernization. Soc Probl 55(3):370–390

    Google Scholar 

  • York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46(3):351–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang X, Zhao T, Wang J et al (2017) The effects of urbanization and household-related factors on residential direct CO2 emissions in Shanxi, China from 1995 to 2014: a decomposition analysis. Atmos Pollut Res 8(2):297–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2011) Relations among the industry structure, energy structure and carbon emissions. J Arid Land Resour Environ 25(05):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Qin Y, Xie SD (2013) Spatial distribution of black carbon emissions in China. Chin Sci Bull 58(31):3830–3839

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Luo L, Skitmore M (2015) Household carbon emission research: an analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects. J Clean Prod 103:873–883

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YJ, Bian XJ, Tan W et al (2017) The indirect energy consumption and CO2 emission caused by household consumption in China: an analysis based on the Input-Output method. J Clean Prod 163:69–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng CD, Liu S (2011) Industrial structure and carbon emission: an empirical analysis based on China provincial panel data. Res Dev 2:26–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Peng X, Wu K (2012) Calculation and decomposition of indirect carbon emissions from residential consumption in China based on the input–output model. Energy Policy 48(3):618–626

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (72074181, 42071416); National Social Science Foundation of China (20CJY023); Project of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China (18XJC790014), Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2019JQ-350); Shaanxi Social Science Foundation (2019S001, 2019S010); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M653780, 2019M663846). The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and corrections on the earlier draft of our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, NO.3 Taicheng Road, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Yiyang Cheng, Yanan Wang, Wei Chen, Qian Wang & Guoli Zhao

Authors
  1. Yiyang Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guoli Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, W. et al. Does income inequality affect direct and indirect household CO2 emissions? A quantile regression approach. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, 1199–1213 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01980-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01980-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation