Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Risk assessment for sustainability in e-waste recycling in circular economy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

E-waste is a hazardous concept for human health, environment and businesses, and therefore, risk assessment is essential to eliminate or reduce the negative effects of e-waste in a circular economy. Decision-making plays an important role during the risk assessment in e-waste recycling. This study aims to develop a decision tool under uncertain and risky conditions for achieving sustainability in electronic waste (e-waste) recycling in circular economy. Prospect theory and its aspects are integrated with the sustainability risk assessment in e-waste recycling. In order to evaluate the irrationality and risk attitudes of decision makers in a risky and uncertain environment, the prospect theory-based TODIM (acronym in Portuguese for interactive and multicriteria decision-making, i.e. Tomada de Decisão Interativa Multicritério) method for a previous computer disassembly problem is used. Using prospect theory, the relationship between loss aversion, reference point, framing and two selves effect, and sustainability dimensions is presented with a sustainability risk assessment point of view. Further, tasks of computer disassembly processes are prioritized by considering risk factors. The results showed that random access memory modules, motherboard and power supply are the highest priority risks based on the evaluation of listed twelve sustainability risks. In this study, it is suggested that prospect theory is suitable for decisions under risk and uncertainty, and it is applicable to integrate sustainability risk assessment and prospect theory in order to fulfil the gap of knowledge.

Graphic abstract

Relationship between prospect theory and sustainability risk assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADR (2010) European agreement concerning the international carriage of dangerous goods by road (ADR applicable as from 1 January 2011). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, ISDN 978-92-1-139140-4. Geneva, Switzerland

  • Alali F, Tolga AC (2019) Portfolio allocation with the TODIM method. Expert Syst Appl 124:341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand A, Khan RA, Wani MF (2016) Development of a sustainability risk assessment index of a mechanical system at conceptual design stage. J Clean Prod 139:258–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asante KA, Amoyaw-Osei Y, Agusa T (2019) E-waste recycling in Africa: risks and opportunities. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 18:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avikal S, Mishra PK, Jain R (2013) An AHP and PROMETHEE methods-based environment friendly heuristic for disassembly line balancing problems. Interdiscip Environ Rev 14(1):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avikal S, Jain R, Mishra PK (2014a) A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing under fuzzy environment. Appl Soft Comput 25:519–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avikal S, Mishra PK, Jain R (2014b) A fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE method-based heuristic for disassembly line balancing problems. Int J Prod Res 52(5):1306–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz NAA, Manab NA, Othman SN (2016) Sustainability risk management (SRM): an extension of enterprise risk management (ERM) concept. Int J Manag Sustain 5(1):1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babar P, Lokhande A, Karade V, Pawar B, Gang MG, Pawar S, Kim JH (2019) Towards highly efficient and low-cost oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts: an effective method of electronic waste management by utilizing waste Cu cable wires. J Colloid Interface Sci 537:43–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babu BR, Parande AK, Basha CA (2007) Electrical and electronic waste: a global environmental problem. Waste Manag Res 25(4):307–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai L, Li Y, Du Q, Xu Y (2017) A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for sustainability risk evaluation of PPP projects. Sustainability 9(10):1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettcher WA III (2004) The prospects for prospect theory: an empirical evaluation of international relations applications of framing and loss aversion. Political Psychol 25:331–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovea M, Pérez-Belis V (2012) A taxonomy of eco-design tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J Clean Prod 20(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgens B, Hobson K, Lilley D, Lee J, Scott JL, Wilson GT (2019) Closing the loop on E-waste: a multidisciplinary perspective. J Ind Ecol 23(1):169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravanos J, Clark E, Fuller R, Lambertson C (2011) Assessing worker and environmental chemical exposure risks at an e-waste recycling and disposal site in Accra, Ghana. J Health Pollut 1(1):16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecere G, Martinelli A (2017) Drivers of knowledge accumulation in electronic waste management: An analysis of publication data. Res Policy 46(5):925–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemweno P, Pintelon L, Van Horenbeek A, Muchiri P (2015) Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: an analytic network process (ANP) approach. Int J Prod Econ 170:663–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Huang Y, Li G, An T, Hu Y, Li Y (2016) VOCs elimination and health risk reduction in e-waste dismantling workshop using integrated techniques of electrostatic precipitation with advanced oxidation technologies. J Hazard Mater 302:395–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran A (2001) Prospect theory & customer choice. Retrieved 11 June 2012

  • Covello VT, Merkhoher MW (2013) Risk assessment methods: approaches for assessing health and environmental risks. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dat LQ, Linh DTT, Chou SY, Vincent FY (2012) Optimizing reverse logistic costs for recycling end-of-life electrical and electronic products. Expert Syst Appl 39(7):6380–6387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directive EC (2012) Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment, WEEE. Off J Eur Union L 197:38–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumay J, Hossain MA (2019) Sustainability risk disclosure practices of listed companies in Australia. Aust Account Rev 29(2):343–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrel D, Gebre B, Hudspeth C, Sellgren A (2013) Risk-based resource allocation: focusing regulatory and enforcement efforts where they are needed the most. McKinsey Center for Government, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazzoli C, Orisakwe OE, Dragone R, Mantovani A (2010) Diagnostic health risk assessment of electronic waste on the general population in developing countries’ scenarios. Environ Impact Assess Rev 30(6):388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García AG, Román-Moguel G, Meraz-Cabrera L, Acevedo J (2012) Policy options for the management of end of life computers in Mexico. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(4):657–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes LFAM, Rangel LAD, Maranhão FJC (2009) Multi-criteria analysis of natural gas destination in Brazil: an application of the TODIM method. Math Comput Model 50(1):92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu AH, Hsu CW, Kuo TC, Wu WC (2009) Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):7142–7147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgin MA, Gupta SM (2012) Remanufacturing modelling and analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Julianelli V, Caiado RGG, Scavarda LF, Cruz Stephanie Pinto De Mesquita Ferreira (2020) Interplay between reverse logistics and circular economy: critical success factors-based taxonomy and framework. Resour Conserv Recycl 158:104784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahhat R, Kim J, Xu M, Allenby B, Williams E, Zhang P (2008) Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(7):955–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2012) Thinking, fast and slow. Allen Lane Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazancoglu Y, Ozkan-Ozen YD (2019) Sustainable disassembly line balancing model based on triple bottom line. Int J Prod Res 58:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiddee P, Naidu R, Wong MH (2013) Electronic waste management approaches: an overview. Waste Manag 33(5):1237–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Holuszko M, Espinosa DCR (2017) E-waste: an overview on generation, collection, legislation and recycling practices. Resour Conserv Recycl 122:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang D, Wang M, Xu Z, Liu D (2020) Risk appetite dual hesitant fuzzy three-way decisions with TODIM. Inf Sci 507:585–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim SR, Schoenung JM (2010) Toxicity potentials from waste cellular phones, and a waste management policy integrating consumer, corporate, and government responsibilities. Waste Manag 30(8):1653–1660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liqui-Cel Membrane Contactor (2017) Assembly & disassembly guide. Retrieved from LiquiCel: http://www.liquicel.com/uploads/documents/M178_rev3_10-05%204x28%20SS%20Assembly%20Guide%20_ke.pdf

  • Manab N, Aziz N (2019) Integrating knowledge management in sustainability risk management practices for company survival. Manag Sci Lett 9(4):585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangla SK, Kumar P, Barua MK (2015) Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangla SK, Kumar P, Barua MK (2016) An integrated methodology of FTA and fuzzy AHP for risk assessment in green supply chain. Int J Oper Res 25(1):77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangla SK, Luthra S, Jakhar S (2018) Benchmarking the risk assessment in green supply chain using fuzzy approach to FMEA. Benchmark Int J 25:1463–5771

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto JC, Silva MM, Santos SM (2016) A time series model for estimating the generation of lead acid battery scrap. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18(6):1931–1943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nnorom IC, Osibanjo O (2008) Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(6):843–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson J, Mali F (2017) Electronic waste—a modern form of risk? On the consequences of the delay between the increasing generation of electronic waste and regulations to manage this increase. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 23(6):1272–1284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palousis N, Luong L, Abhary K (2010) Sustainability risk identification in product development. Int J Sustain Eng 3(2):70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal D, Mangla SK, Tyagi M, Ram M (2018) Risk analysis for clean and sustainable production in a urea fertilizer industry. Int J Qual Reliability Manag 35:1459–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira J, Gomes LFAM, Paredes F (2013) Robustness analysis in a TODIM-based multicriteria evaluation model of rental properties. Technol Econ Dev Econ 19:176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto VN (2008) E-waste hazard: the impending challenge. Indian J Occup Environ Med 12(2):65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purchase D (2017) Electronic waste—an emerging global environmental and health challenge in the 21st century

  • Qin J, Liu X, Pedrycz W (2017) An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Eur J Oper Res 258(2):626–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafi-Ul-Shan PM, Grant DB, Perry P, Ahmed S (2018) Relationship between sustainability and risk management in fashion supply chains. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 46:466–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reike D, Vermeulen WJV, Witjes S (2018) The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0? Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resour Conserv Recycl 135:246–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Zhang C, Zhao F, Tian G, Lin W, Meng L, Li H (2018) Disassembly line balancing problem using interdependent weights-based multi-criteria decision making and 2-optimal algorithm. J Clean Prod 174(1):1475–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resource Association (2017) Recycling quality specifications. Accessed 24 Jan 2018

  • Robinson BH (2009) E-waste: an assessment of global production and environmental impacts. Sci Total Environ 408(2):183–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood M, Shu LH (2000) Modified FMEA using analysis of automotive remanufacturer waste streams to support design for remanufacture. In: Proceedings of the ASME DETC: CIE, Baltimore, MD

  • Sikdar S (2020) Measures for sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:279–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01817-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streicher-Porte M, Bader HP, Scheidegger R, Kytzia S (2007) Material flow and economic analysis as a suitable tool for system analysis under the constraints of poor data availability and quality in emerging economies. Clean Technol Environ Policy 9(4):325–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tao Y, Meng K, Lou P, Peng X, Qian X (2018) Joint decision-making on automated disassembly system scheme selection and recovery route assignment using multi-objective meta-heuristic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 57:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Thais AR, Santos MBG, Ronildo OO (2017) Occupational risks in the disassembly, transportation and reassembly (DTR) operations of drilling probes. In: Occupational safety and hygiene V: selected papers from the international symposium on occupational safety and hygiene. Taylor and Francis, pp 175–180

  • Tseng ML, Lin YH, Tan K, Chen RH, Chen YH (2014) Using TODIM to evaluate green supply chain practices under uncertainty. Appl Math Model 38(11–12):2983–2995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Environment (2017) Dimensions of pollution. Accessed 26 Jan 2018

  • Valinejad F, Rahmani D (2018) Sustainability risk management in the supply chain of telecommunication companies: a case study. J Clean Prod 203:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valis D, Koucky M (2009) Selected overview of risk assessment techniques. Probl Eksploat 4:19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmer R, Oswald-Krapf H, Sinha-Khetriwal D, Schnellmann M, Böni H (2005) Global perspectives on e-waste. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25(5):436–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijethilake C, Lama T (2019) Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure. Bus Strategy Environ 28(1):143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX, Tam CM, Tam VW (2010) Integrating safety, environmental and quality risks for project management using a FMEA method. Eng Econ 66(1)

  • Zeng X, Duan H, Wang F, Li J (2017) Examining environmental management of e-waste: China’s experience and lessons. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:1076–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zindani D, Maity SR, Bhowmik S, Chakraborty S (2017) A material selection approach using the TODIM (TOmada de Decisao Interativa Multicriterio) method and its analysis. Int J Mater Res 108(5):345–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Logistics Management, Yasar University, 35100, Izmir, Turkey

    Yigit Kazancoglu & Yesim Deniz Ozkan-Ozen

  2. Knowledge Management and Business Decision Making, Plymouth Business School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK

    Sachin Kumar Mangla

  3. Department of Mathematics; Computer Science and Engineering, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India

    Mangey Ram

Authors
  1. Yigit Kazancoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yesim Deniz Ozkan-Ozen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sachin Kumar Mangla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mangey Ram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yigit Kazancoglu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazancoglu, Y., Ozkan-Ozen, Y.D., Mangla, S.K. et al. Risk assessment for sustainability in e-waste recycling in circular economy. Clean Techn Environ Policy 24, 1145–1157 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01901-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01901-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation