Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distinguishing approach, methodology, method, procedure and technique in process systems engineering

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1950s, the field of process systems engineering (PSE) research experienced growth. PSE research has contributed several ways in which a process or energy system could be designed. To describe the aforementioned “ways” to design process or energy systems, several papers have used varied terminologies such as approach, methodology, method, procedure and technique (AMMPT). These five terms have been used frequently and interchangeably. However, these five terms do possess distinct meanings and must be used appropriately. In this respect, we argue for the need for a systematic framework to clearly distinguish AMMPT terminologies from the PSE perspective. In this paper, we offer a perspective on AMMPT terminologies and provide a conceptual framework to understand the distinctions between them as well as how they could be used appropriately in PSE.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andiappan V (2017) State-of-the-art review of mathematical optimisation approaches for synthesis of energy systems. Process Integr Optim Sustain 1:165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andiappan V, Ng DS, Tan RR (2017) Design operability and retrofit analysis (DORA) framework for energy systems. Energy 134:1038–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshier K (2018) Method vs. methodology: understanding the difference. In: UX Collect. https://uxdesign.cc/method-vs-methodology-whats-the-difference-9cc755c2e69d. Accessed 2 Nov 2019

  • Burnham J (1999) Approach, method, technique: making distinctions and creating connections. J Syst Consult Manag 3:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemmangattuvalappil NG (2010) A systematic property based approach for molecular synthesis using higher order molecular groups and molecular descriptors. Auburn University, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB (1990) Origins of the simplex method. In: Nash S (ed) A history in scientific computing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York, pp. 141–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dimian AC, Bildea CS, Kiss AA (2014) Integrated design and simulation of chemical processes, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran MA, Grossmann IE (1986) Simultaneous optimization and heat integration of chemical processes. AIChE J 32:123–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Educational Research Techniques (2019) Approach, method, procedure, and techniques in language learning. https://educationalresearchtechniques.com/. Accessed 2 Nov 2019

  • El-Halwagi MM, Gabriel F, Harell D (2003) Rigorous graphical targeting for resource conservation via material recycle/reuse networks. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:4319–4328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foo DCY (2009) State-of-the-art review of pinch analysis techniques for water network synthesis. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:5125–5159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foo DCY, Tan RR (2016) A review on process integration techniques for carbon emissions and environmental footprint problems. Process Saf Environ Prot 103:291–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler F, Tarjan K, Huang YW, Fan LT (1992) Graph-theoretic approach to process synthesis: axioms and theorems. Chem Eng Sci 47:1973–1988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann IE (1990) MINLP optimization strategies and algorithms for process synthesis. In: Siirola J, Grosmann IE, Stephanopoulos G (eds) Foundations of computer-aided process design (FOCAPD’89). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofler DB (1983) Approach, method, technique—a clarification. Lit Res Instr 23:71–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst R, Tuy H (1996) Global optimization: deterministic approaches. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Land AH, Doig AG (1960) An automatic method of solving discrete programming problems. Econometrica 28:497–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SC, Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Tan RR (2009) Extended pinch targeting techniques for carbon-constrained energy sector planning. Appl Energy 86:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH, Shin J, Realff MJ (2018) Machine learning: overview of the recent progresses and implications for the process systems engineering field. Comput Chem Eng 114:111–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linnhoff B, Ahmad S (1990) Cost optimum heat exchanger networks—1. Minimum energy and capital using simple models for capital cost. Comput Chem Eng 14:729–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linnhoff B, Townsend DW, Boland D et al (1982) User guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby

    Google Scholar 

  • The Open University (2015) Managing complexity: a systems approach – introduction. The Open University, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng LY (2015) Novel integrated design techniques for. The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning C, You F (2019) Optimization under uncertainty in the era of big data and deep learning: when machine learning meets mathematical programming. Comput Chem Eng 125:434–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR (2004) Product and process design principles: synthesis, analysis and evaluation, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah N (1996) Mathematical programming techniques for crude oil scheduling. Comput Chem Eng 20:1227–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephanopoulos G, Reklaitis GV (2011) Process systems engineering: from Solvay to modern bio- and nanotechnology. A history of development, successes and prospects for the future. Chem Eng Sci 66:4272–4306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan RR, Foo DCY (2007) Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning. Energy 32:1422–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tawarmalani M, Sahinidis NV (2002) Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs: a theoretical and computational study. Math Program 99:563–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten JY (2017) The integration of safety and health aspects in chemical product design framework. The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatasubramanian V (2019) The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: is it here, finally? AIChE J 65:466–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yee TF, Grossmann IE, Kravanja Z (1990) Simultaneous optimization models for heat integration-I. Area and energy targeting and modeling of multi-stream exchangers. Comput Chem Eng 14:1151–1164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the School of Engineering and Physical Sciences at Heriot-Watt University Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viknesh Andiappan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andiappan, V., Wan, Y.K. Distinguishing approach, methodology, method, procedure and technique in process systems engineering. Clean Techn Environ Policy 22, 547–555 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01819-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01819-w

Keywords

Navigation