Advertisement

Analysis of the impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in 12 MENA countries

  • Montassar Kahia
  • Mehdi Ben JebliEmail author
  • Mounir Belloumi
Original Paper
  • 231 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of renewable energy consumption, economic growth, foreign direct investment inflows and trade on carbon dioxide emissions for a panel of 12 Middle East and North Africa countries over the period 1980–2012 using the recent Panel Vector Autoregressive model with multi-domain analysis framework. The results from Granger causality test reveal a bidirectional causality relationship between the candidate variables supporting the feedback hypothesis. The findings show that economic growth leads to environmental degradation while renewable energy, international trade and foreign direct investment inflows lead to decreases carbon dioxide emissions. A serious shift toward using more renewable energy resources, international trade and foreign direct investment inward is recommended to improve the environmental quality and attain the sustainable growth in the region.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Renewable energy Economic growth CO2 emissions Panel vector error correction model Middle East and North Africa 

Notes

References

  1. Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90:102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdouli M, Hammami S (2017) Investigating the causality links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment and economic growth in MENA countries. Int Bus Rev 26:264–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abrigo MRM, Love I (2015) Estimation of panel vector autoregression in stata: a package of programs. Stata J 16:778–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad N, Du L (2017) Effects of energy production and CO2 emissions on economic growth in Iran: ARDL approach. Energy 123:521–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akbostanci E, Turut-Asik S, Ipek TG (2009) The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37:861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Mulali U (2012) Factors affecting CO2 emission in the Middle East: a panel data analysis. Energy 44:564–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-MulaliU Tang CF, Ozturk I (2015) Estimating the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:918–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alshehry AS, Belloumi M (2017) Study of the environmental Kuznets curve for transport carbon dioxide emissions in Saudi Arabia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:1339–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ang JB (2008) Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. J Policy Model 30:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:808–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Apergis N (2016) Environmental Kuznets curves: new evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions. Energy Econ 54:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Apergis N, Payne JE (2014) Renewable energy, output, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuel prices in Central America: evidence from a nonlinear panel smooth transition vector error correction model. Energy Econ 42:226–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Apergis N, Payne JE (2015) Renewable energy, output, carbon dioxide emissions, and oil prices: evidence from South America. Energy Sources Part B Econ Plan Policy 10:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ben Jebli M (2016) On the causal links between health indicator, output, combustible renewables and waste consumption, rail transport, and CO2 emissions: the case of Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:16699–16715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S (2015) Economic growth, combustible renewables and waste consumption, and CO2 emissions in North Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:16022–16030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S (2017) The role of renewable energy and agriculture in reducing CO2 emissions: evidence for North Africa countries. Ecol Ind 74:295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Ind 60:824–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bhattacharya M, Churchill SA, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energy 111:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut U (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:838–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bölük G, Mert M (2015) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bouznit M, Pablo-Romero MDP (2016) CO2 emission and economic growth in Algeria. Energy Policy 96:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown LR (2011) World on the edge: how to prevent environmental and economic collapse. W. W. Norton and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) (2011) Ranking of the world’s countries by 2011 per capita fossil-fuel CO2 emission rates. Research Institute for Environment, Energy and Economics. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/top2011.cap. Accessed Jan 2018
  24. Cerdeira Bento JP, Moutinho V (2016) CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:142–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:10846–10854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dogan E, Seker F (2016a) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dogan E, Seker F (2016b) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1074–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ellis J (2010) The effects of fossil-fuel subsidy reform: a review of modelling and empirical studies. International Institute for Sustainable Development, WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  30. Ertugrul HM, Cetin M, Seker F, Dogan E (2016) The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecol Ind 67:543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Esso LJ, Keho Y (2016) Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: cointegration and causality evidence from selected African countries. Energy 114:492–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Farzanegan MR, Markwardt G (2012) Pollution, economic development and democracy: evidence from the MENA countries. Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics. http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb02/makro/forschung/magkspapers/index_html%28magks%29. Accessed Jan 2018
  33. Hakimi A, Hamdi H (2016) Trade liberalization, FDI inflows, environmental quality and economic growth: a comparative analysis between Tunisia and Morocco. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:1445–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halicioglu F, Ketenci N (2016) The impact of international trade on environmental quality: The case of transition countries. Energy 109:1130–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50:1029–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. IEA (Internatianal Energy Agency) (2008) World energy outlook 2008, International Energy Agency (IEA). OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2010) World energy outlook 2010. OECD/IEA, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115:53–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ito K (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: evidence from panel data for developing countries. Int Econ 151:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jalil SA (2014) Carbon dioxide emission in the Middle East and North African (MENA) region: a dynamic panel data study. J Emerg Econ Islam Res 2:1–13Google Scholar
  42. Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econom 108:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lütkepohl H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy 38:2911–2915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neequaye NA, Oladi R (2015) Environment, growth, and FDI revisited. Int Rev Econ Finance 39:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C (2014) Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Econ Model 42:382–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pazienza P (2015) The relationship between CO2 and Foreign Direct Investment in the agriculture and fishing sector of OECD countries: evidence and policy considerations. Intellect Econ 9(1):55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econom 22:265–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ren S, Yuan B, Ma X, Chen X (2014) International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Econ Rev 28:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sadorsky P (2009) Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries. Energy Econ 31:456–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2017) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.009 Google Scholar
  53. Seker F, Ertugrul HM, Cetin M (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:2947–2953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2017) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2014) Climate change synthesis report summary for policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment…/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf. Accessed Jan 2018
  59. Vogelvang B (2005) Econometrics: theory and applications with EViews, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp 14–16Google Scholar
  60. Von Moltke A, McKee C, Morgan T (2004) Energy subsidies: lessons learned in assessing their impact and designing policy reforms. Greenleaf Publishing, SheffeldGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang KM (2012) Modelling the nonlinear relationship between CO2 emissions from oil and economic growth. Econ Model 29:1537–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. World Bank (2012) Word development indicators online database. World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  63. World Bank (2013) World bank group: water is focus of climate change in Middle East and North Africa. http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website01418/WEB/0__C-151.HTM. Accessed Jan 2018
  64. World Bank (2016) World Bank Annual Report. http://worldbank.org/annualreport
  65. World Bank (2017) Energy study. http://web.worldbank.org/wbsite/external/countries/menaext. Accessed Jan 2018
  66. Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zoundi A (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:1067–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Montassar Kahia
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mehdi Ben Jebli
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Mounir Belloumi
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.LAREQUAD & FSEGTUniversity of Tunis El ManarTunisTunisia
  2. 2.Department of Finance & Economics, College of Business and EconomicsQassim UniversityBuraydahSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.FSJEG de JendoubaUniversity of JendoubaJendoubaTunisia
  4. 4.Univ. Manouba, ESCT, QUARG UR17ES26TunisTunisia
  5. 5.College of Administrative SciencesNajran UniversityNajranSaudi Arabia
  6. 6.LAMIDEDUniversite de SousseSousseTunisia

Personalised recommendations