The need to adapt sustainability audits to atypical business models

Brief Report

Abstract

While a growing number of businesses aspire toward sustainability, doing so requires new business models that aim to achieve triple bottom line benefits (economic, environmental, and social), while utilizing appropriate technologies and new knowledge platforms for doing business. “Third Places,” defined as places of public gathering outside of work or home, have emerged as powerful platforms for business model innovation, in the form of incubators, co-working spaces, and innovation hubs. Third Places enable a diverse group of actors, including entrepreneurs, employees, and investors to informally interact and develop innovative ways of doing business. Third Places tend to be structurally more complex than traditional production facilities as they have multiple firms interacting in formal and informal ways. In this commentary, we discuss the challenges of measuring the sustainability performance of Third Places using conventional sustainability audit tools.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was partially funded by the GloFoodS meta-program. The authors would like to thank everyone who has been taking part of the auditing process at The Plant, including Jonathan Pereira and the staff at Plant Chicago. We would also like to thank Julia Norberto who interned in the Complex and Sustainable Urban Networks (CSUN) Lab in summer 2016. We were thrilled to be part of The Plant, taking part into that great adventure to more sustainable businesses practices and a better society. This research was also partly supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Award #155173.

References

  1. Ahmad N, Derrible S (2015) Evolution of public supply water withdrawal in the USA: a network approach. J Ind Ecol 19:321–330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad N, Derrible S, Eason T, Cabezas H (2016) Using Fisher information to track stability in multivariate systems. R Soc Open Sci 3:160582.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad N, Derrible S, Cabezas H (2017) Using Fisher information to assess stability in the performance of public transportation systems. R Soc Open Sci 4:160920.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amit R, Zott C (2010) Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 53(3):41Google Scholar
  5. Baden-Fuller C, Haefliger S (2013) Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Plan 46(6):419–426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumann-Pauly D, Wickert C, Spence LJ, Scherer AG (2013) Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: size matters. J Bus Ethics 115(4):693–705.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1827-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bocken NMP, Short SW, Rana P, Evans S (2014) A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J Clean Prod 65(February):42–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bubbly Dynamics (2018) The Plant. https://www.bubblydynamics.com/the-plant/. Accessed 14 Mar 2018
  9. Chance E, Ashton WS, Pereira J, Mulrow JS, Norberto JA, Derrible S, Guilbert S (2017) The Plant—an experiment in urban food sustainability. Environ Prog Sustain Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12712 (to be published) Google Scholar
  10. Coyne KL (2006) Sustainability auditing. Environ Qual Manag 16(2):25–41.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Derrible S, Ahmad N (2015) Network-based and binless frequency analyses. PLoS ONE 10(11):e0142108.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flora CB, Flora JL, Fey S (2004) Rural communities: legacy and change, 2nd edn. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  13. Foundation Center (2016) Knowledge to build on. Tools and resources for assessing social impact. https://foundationcenter.org. Accessed 11 Nov 2017
  14. Graedel TE, Allenby BR (1995) Industrial ecology. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinbach K, Aretz A, Hirschl B, Prahl A, Salecki S (2014) Renewable energies and their impact on local value added and employment. Energy Sustain Soc 4(1):1.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-4-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huffington Post (2012) The Plant explained: a tour of Chicago’s amazing vertical farm (Photos, Video). https://www.huffingtonpost.com. Accessed 14 Mar 2018
  17. ISO (2005) ISO 22000 family—food safety managementGoogle Scholar
  18. ISO (2015) ISO 14000 family—environmental managementGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson T (2011) Societal transformations for a sustainable economy. Nat Resour Forum 35:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 70:71Google Scholar
  21. Mamede P, Gomes CF (2014) Corporate sustainability measurement in service organizations: a case study from Portugal: corporate sustainability measurement. Environ Qual Manag 23:49–73.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin G, Clift R, Christie I (2016) urban cultivation and its contributions to sustainability: nibbles of food but oodles of social capital. Sustainability 8(5):409.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McEwen T (2013) An examination of barriers that impact the implementation of environmental sustainability practices in small businesses. J Bus Entrep 25:117–139Google Scholar
  24. Mononen L, Auvinen A-P, Ahokumpu A-L, Rönkä M, Aarras N, Tolvanen H, Kamppinen M, Viirret E, Kumpula T, Vihervaara P (2016) National ecosystem service indicators: measures of social–ecological sustainability. Ecol Ind 61(February):27–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulrow JS, Derrible S, Ashton WS, Chopra SS (2017) Industrial symbiosis at the facility scale: facility-scale industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 21(3):559–571.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oldenburg R (1997) Our vanishing ‘Third Places’. Plan Comm J 25:6Google Scholar
  27. Plant Chicago (2018) Who we are. http://plantchicago.org. Accessed 24 Feb 2018
  28. Rothenberg S (2007) Sustainability through servicizing. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48:83Google Scholar
  29. SDExec (2018) Blockchain is the new supply chain. https://www.sdcexec.com/. Accessed 14 Mar
  30. Soyka PA (2014) On the horizon: big changes loom in sustainability reporting. Environ Qual Manag 23(3):81–87.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Techcrunch (2016) Blockchain has the potential to revolutionize the supply chain. https://techcrunch.com/. Accessed 14 Mar 2018
  32. Wave-Innovation (2018) Darwin eco-sytem: a hothouse of eco-companies dedicated to economic cooperation and ecological transition. http://www.wave-innovation.com/en/darwin-eco-systeme.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2018
  33. Wexler D, Mark N, Oberlander J (2017) The shifting discourse on Third Places: ideological implications. J Ideol 38(1):4Google Scholar
  34. World Health Organization Europe (2017) France becomes one of the first countries in Region to recommend colour-coded front-of-pack nutrition labelling system. http://www.euro.who.int/en/home. Accessed 12 Mar 2018
  35. WTTW (2016) Local entrepreneurs aim for zero waste with Plant Chicago. http://chicagotonight.wttw.com. Accessed 14 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agropolymers Engineering and Emerging Technologies Research UnitFrench National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)MontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Complex and Sustainable Urban Networks (CSUN) Lab, Department of Civil and Materials EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Stuart School of BusinessIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations