Advertisement

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 443–449 | Cite as

Low-carbon emission development in Asia: energy sector, waste management and environmental management system

  • Chew Tin Lee
  • Nor Erniza Mohammad Rozali
  • Yee Van Fan
  • Jiří Jaromír Klemeš
  • Sirintornthep Towprayoon
Review

Abstract

Mitigation of greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions is desirable without compromising the economic growth. This paper reviews the recent trends to mitigate GHG emissions in the key sectors of energy and solid waste. The energy sector is the key admitter for global GHG emissions, and a range of optimisation and modelling tool has been developed to minimise the GHG emissions and overall cost, especially for the implementation of renewable energies such as biofuel and biogas. A few carbon sequestration technologies such as the carbon capture and storage (CCS) and biochar application have been reviewed. The review included the challenges and knowledge gaps regarding the utilisation of CCS, such as the storage capacity, long-term policy framework, high costs and the potential risk. Although solid waste contributes about < 5% of the global GHG emissions, effective solid waste management remained a great challenge in many fast-growing cities in Asia. Considering the high organic portion (> 40%) in the municipal solid waste for many developing countries in Asia, composting has been proposed as a viable treatment technology to convert waste-to-wealth. A range of waste management tools, including scenario analyses on different waste technologies, optimisation of waste collection routes, multi-criteria decision tools, is reviewed to support the decision-making for solid waste management. A range of environmental management system (EMS) has been adopted by organisations to improve product quality, reducing production cost and improves reputation of firms. An environmental policy such as tax exemption could be helpful to promote the adoption of EMS that could be costly. CO2 and material flow footprint tools, such as water–energy–materials nexus, are applicable at a city and regional level. The tools are used to mitigate GHG emissions by developing the mechanisms with shared markets of virtual resource flows (carbon, water, food, energy) between the trading partners regionally and internationally.

Keywords

Greenhouse gases emissions Energy sector Solid waste management Environmental management system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge research grants from the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia with Grant Nos. S.J130000.0846.4Y042 and Q.J130000.2546.15H25; and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Research University Grant No. Q.J130000.2546.14H65; and the EU project Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory—SPIL, Project No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000456, funded by Czech Republic Operational Programme Research, Development and Education, Priority 1: Strengthening capacity for quality research, in a collaboration agreement with UTM.

References

  1. ADB (Asian Development Bank) (2016) Asian development outlook 2016 update: meeting the low carbon growth challenge. www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/197141/ado2016-update.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
  2. BP (2017) Statistical review of world energy. www. bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  3. Chen YT (2016) A cost analysis of food waste composting in Taiwan. Sustainability 8(11):1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen S, Xu B, Chen B (2018) Unfolding the interplay between carbon flows and socioeconomic development in a city: What can network analysis offer? Appl Energy 211:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das S, Bhattacharyya BK (2015) Optimization of municipal solid waste collection and transportation routes. Waste Manag 43:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng L, Liu S, Kim DG, Peng C, Sweeney S, Shangguan Z (2017) Past and future carbon sequestration benefits of China’s grain for green program. Global Environ Change 47:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eurostat (2017) Greenhouse gas emission statistics. ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Greenhouse_gas_emission_statistics. Accessed 27 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  8. ExxonMobil (2017) Developing cutting edge technology—carbon capture and storage. corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/technology/carbon-capture-and-storage/carbon-capture-and-storage/developing-cutting-edge-technology-carbon-capture-and-storage. Accessed 27 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  9. Fan YV, Lee CT, Klemeš JJ, Bong CPC, Ho WS (2016) Economic assessment system towards sustainable composting quality in the developing countries. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18(8):2479–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gasser T, Guivarch C, Tachiiri K, Jones CD, Ciais P (2015) Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nat Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8958 Google Scholar
  11. Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W (2013) Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag 33:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han S, Kim J (2017) Optimization-based integration and analysis of a complex renewable energy system for the transportation sector. Chem Eng Res Des 128:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hiremath RB, Shikha S, Ravindranath NH (2007) Decentralized energy planning, modeling and application—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(5):729–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houng H, Shen S, Ma H (2014) Municipal solid waste management in Taiwan: from solid waste to sustainable material management. In: Pariatamby A, Tanaka M (eds) Municipal solid waste management in Asia and the Pacific Islands: challenges and strategic solutions. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2007) Working group I fourth assessment report ‘the physical science basis’. In particular. wg1.ipcc.ch/publications/wg1-ar4/wg1-ar4.html. Accessed 27 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  16. Iraldo F, Testa F, Frey M (2009) Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union. J Clean Prod 17(16):1444–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee CT, Lim JS, Fan YV, Liu X, Fujiwara T, Klemeš JJ (2018) Enabling low-carbon emissions for sustainable development in Asia and beyond. J Clean Prod 176:726–735.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447(7141):143–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liddle B (2018) Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus. Energy Econ 69:71–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu LC, Li Q, Zhang JT, Cao D (2016) Toward a framework of environmental risk management for CO2 geological storage in China: gaps and suggestions for future regulations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 21(2):191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malakahmad A, Bakri PM, Mokhtar MRM, Khalil N (2014) Solid waste collection routes optimization via GIS techniques in Ipoh city, Malaysia. Proced Eng 77:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olivier JGJ, Schure KM, Peters JAHW (2017) Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency 2017 Report. www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/pbl-2017-trends-in-global-co2-and-total-greenhouse-gas-emissons-2017-report_2674.pdf. Accessed 06.01.2018
  23. Rahman FA, Aziz MMA, Saidur R, Bakar WAWA, Hainin MR, Putrajaya R, Hassan NA (2017) Pollution to solution: capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:112–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith P (2016) Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. Glob Change Biol 22(3):1315–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song H, Zhao C, Zeng J (2017) Can environmental management improve financial performance: an empirical study of A-shares listed companies in China. J Clean Prod 141:1051–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tan ST, Lee CT, Hashim H, Ho WS, Lim JS (2014) Optimal process network for municipal solid waste management in Iskandar Malaysia. J Clean Prod 71:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tanaka Y, Sawada Y, Tanase D, Tanaka J, Shiomi S, Kasukawa T (2017) Tomakomai CCS demonstration project of Japan, CO2 injection in process. Energy Proced 114:5836–5846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2015) Global waste management outlook 2015. eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/99773/1/GWMO_report.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  29. Watanabe C (2016) Japan pushes ahead with Hokkaido carbon capture test despite quake concerns. The Japan Times. www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/03/01/national/science-health/japan-pushes-ahead-hokkaido-carbon-capture-test-despite-quake-concerns/#.WkAxCkqnFPY. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
  30. White DJ, Hubacek K, Feng K, Sun L, Meng B (2018) The water–energy–food nexus in East Asia: a tele-connected value chain analysis using inter-regional input–output analysis. Appl Energy 210:550–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xue W, Cao K, Li W (2015) Municipal solid waste collection optimization in Singapore. Appl Geogr 62:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang L, Zhang X, McAlinden KJ (2016) The effect of trust on people’s acceptance of CCS (carbon capture and storage) technologies: evidence from a survey in the People’s Republic of China. Energy 96:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang J, Okwananke A, Tohidi B, Chuvilin E, Maerle K, Istomin V, Bukhanov B, Cheremisin A (2017) Flue gas injection into gas hydrate reservoirs for methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration. Energy Convers Manag 136:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhou X, Xu Z, Yao L, Tu Y, Lev B, Pedrycz W (2018) A novel data envelopment analysis model for evaluating industrial production and environmental management system. J Clean Prod 170(Supplement C):773–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chew Tin Lee
    • 1
  • Nor Erniza Mohammad Rozali
    • 2
  • Yee Van Fan
    • 3
  • Jiří Jaromír Klemeš
    • 3
  • Sirintornthep Towprayoon
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Chemical and Energy EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)Johor BahruMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASSeri IskandarMalaysia
  3. 3.Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory – SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrno University of Technology - VUT BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  4. 4.The Joint Graduate School of Energy and EnvironmentKing Mongkut’s University of Technology ThonburiTungkruThailand

Personalised recommendations