Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using geospatial data for decision making for a MSW management plan in the city: a case study in Bangkok, Thailand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under the pressure of rapid urbanization, many cities encounter a great challenge in providing decent and efficient waste management service. Many ongoing and previous studies have experimented with various techniques to provide suggestions and alternatives to improve solid waste management in urbanized areas. There is a demand for the development of high-impact information and detailed planning approaches, which can lead to effective waste management. The goal of this research is to analyze how to apply various sets of performance indicators as a predetermined parameter to prioritize hot spots in waste generation and handling in the city. Due to limited resources in the public finance sectors of government agencies, tackling solid waste issues with the most effective efforts will help solve the problem more quickly and efficiently. The study examined how geospatial data can be used to assist with municipal solid waste management planning and monitoring. The study determined how to use a set of waste management indicators to better manage solid waste issues in the city of Bangkok. Hot spot areas are identified and mapped using geographic information systems (GIS). Results indicate that 85% of hot spot areas are located near the On Nuch transfer station, and ~ 70% of hot spot areas are located in the central and southern zones of Bangkok. Ultimately, the research analyzed information to develop a short-term recommendation that focuses on improving waste pickup schedules and routing and on providing a long-term recommendation for reducing waste generation rates and improving waste management technology in sub-district areas. This study can provide a foundation for how to select a set of indicators and use geospatial data to better assist with environmental management planning to make recommendations in any urbanized city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADB (2001) Urban indicators for managing cities. Manila, Philippines

  • BMA (2009) Municipal solid waste management. Bangkok, Thailand

  • BMA (2015) 20 year development plan for Bangkok Metropolis phase 1 (2013–2017). Bangkok, Thailand

  • BMA (2016) Bangkok development plan in 2013–2017. Bangkok, Thailand

  • Chalkias C, Lasaridi K (2011) Benefits from GIS based modelling for municipal solid waste management. In: Sunil Kumar (ed) Integrated waste management, vol I, Chap 22. InTech, 548 p

  • Challcharoenwattana A, Pharino C (2016) Multiple criteria decision analysis to promote recycling activities at different stages of urbanization. Clean Prod 137:1118–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagnani E, Guimaraes JR (2017) Waste management plan for higher education institutions in developing countries: the continuous improvement cycle model. J Clean Prod 147:108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo A, Carlos M, Peris M, Colomer JF (2014) Methodology to design a municipal solid waste generation and composition map: a case study. Waste Manag 34:1920–1981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W (2013) Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag 33:220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inazumi S, Ohtsu H, Shiotani T, Katsumi T (2011) Environmental assessment and accounting for the waste disposal stream in Bangkok Thailand. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 13:139–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCCC (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Japan

  • Marshall RE, Farahbakhsh K (2013) Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Manag 33:988–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihai FC, Apostol L (2012) Disparities in municipal waste management across EU-27. A geographical approach. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61289/. Accessed 10 Jan 2017

  • National Statistic Thailand (2014) Non-registered population report in 2010. Bangkok, Thailand

  • Ngoc NU, Schnitzer H (2009) Sustainable solutions for solid waste management in Southeast Asian countries. Waste Manag 29:1982–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman SN, Noor ZZ, Abba HA, Yusuf OR (2013) Review on life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management in some Asian countries. J Clean Prod 41:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papargyropoulou E, Colenbrander S, Sudmant AH, Gouldson A, Tin CL (2015) The economic case for low carbon waste management in rapidly growing cities in the developing world: the case of Palembang Indonesia. J Environ Manag 163:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharino C (2017) Challenges for sustainable solid waste management lessons from Thailand. Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4631-5

  • Stockholm Environment Institute and Technische (SEI) (2010) Developing a pragmatic approach to assess urban metabolism in Europe. A report to the European Environment Agency. Techniche Universităt Berlin

  • Sukholthaman P, Chanvarasuth P, Sharp A (2017) Analysis of waste generation variables and people’s attitudes towards waste management systems: a case of Bangkok, Thailand. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19:645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Meng X, Peng S (2017) Effect of waste to energy plants on China’s urbanization: evidence from a Hedonic price analysis in Shenzhen. Sustainablility 9:475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troschinetz AM, Mihelcic JR (2009) Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries. Waste Manag 29:915–923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2010) Annex 14 Methodological tool “Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from dumping waste at a solid waste disposal site”. UNFCCC Publishing. https://cdm.unfccc.int/EB/026/eb26_repan14.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2017

  • UNFCCC (2012) AM0025 version 14.0.0 Sectoral scopes:01 and 13 EB 68. UNFCCC Publishing. https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/tools/am-tool-04-v6.0.0.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2017

  • UNFCCC (2013) Clean development mechanism methodology booklet. Germany

  • UNFCCC (2013) Methodological tool emissions from solid waste disposal sites ACM0001 version 15.0.0 Sectoral scope: 13. UNFCCC Publishing. https://cdm.unfccc.int/EB/036/eb36_repan10.pdf Accessed 3 February 2017

  • UNFPA (2011) Impact of population changing in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand

  • Uyarra E, Gee S (2013) Transforming urban waste into sustainable material and energy usage: the case of Greater Manchester (UK). J Clean Prod 50:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivanco FD, Ventosa PI, Durany GX (2012) Building waste management core indicators through spatial material flow analysis: net recovery and transport intensity indexes. Waste Manag 32:2496–2510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wannawilai P, Poboon C, Maneein J (2017) Analysis of solid waste management and strategies for Bangkok metropolitan. Environ Nat Resour J 15(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Wang J, Duan H, Ouyang L, Huang W, Zuo J (2016) An innovative approach to managing demolition waste via GIS (Geographic Information System): a case study in Shenzhen city, China. J Clean Prod 112:494–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaim O, Gazel TU, Akkemik A (2017) Measuring energy intensity in Japan: a new method. Eur J Oper Res 258:778–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work received financial supports from the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund) and the Center of Excellence of Environmental and Hazardous Waste Management (EHWM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanathip Pharino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singtong, S., Pharino, C. Using geospatial data for decision making for a MSW management plan in the city: a case study in Bangkok, Thailand. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20, 667–680 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1495-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1495-5

Keywords

Navigation