Advertisement

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 427–433 | Cite as

Application of nanotechnology in removal of NAPLs from contaminated aquifers: a source clean-up experimental study

  • Tannaz PakEmail author
  • Nathaly Lopes Archilha
  • Raaid Al-Imari
Original Paper

Abstract

This work investigates the removal of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) from groundwater resources using nanotechnology. We present results of a series of multiphase fluid displacement experiments conducted in a naturally occurring sandstone rock. These experiments involve injection of an aqueous suspension of silica nanoparticles to remove a trapped NAPL phase. Specifically, the effect of nanoparticle concentration on the efficiency of the NAPL removal is studied. Our results show that silica nanoparticles successfully remobilised the trapped NAPL phase and resulted in 13% increase in its removal efficiency. The optimal concentration for NAPL removal efficiency is found to be 0.3 wt%.

Keywords

Nanotechnology Porous media Removal of organic contaminants Non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was partly supported by the Royal Academy of Engineering under the Newton Research Collaboration Programme (Academy Reference: NRCP1516/1/159). We thank Jeffrey Lawrence, Marwan Rezk, and Richard Medd for their helps in SEM imaging and Zeta potential measurements.

Supplementary material

10098_2018_1487_MOESM1_ESM.docx (213 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 213 kb)

References

  1. Ahmadi M et al (2013) Zeta-potential investigation and experimental study of nanoparticles deposited on rock surface to reduce fines migration. SPE J 18(3):534–544.  https://doi.org/10.2118/142633-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aulenta F, Majone M, Tandoi V (2006) Enhanced anaerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents: environmental factors influencing microbial activity and their relevance under field conditions. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81(9):1463–1474.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardos R et al (2011) A risk/benefit approach to the application of iron nanoparticles for the remediation of contaminated sites in the environment. http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/14887/1/CB0440FInalReport.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2017
  4. Ben-Moshe T, Dror I, Berkowitz B (2010) Transport of metal oxide nanoparticles in saturated porous media. Chemosphere 81(3):387–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennetzen MV, Mogensen K (2014) Novel applications of nanoparticles for future enhanced oil recovery. In: International petroleum technology conference, pp 10–12.  https://doi.org/10.2523/17857-ms
  6. Berg S et al (2013) Real-time 3D imaging of Haines jumps in porous media flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(10):3755–3759.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221373110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bharti C et al (2015) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in target drug delivery system: a review. Int J Pharm Investig 5(3):124–133.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-973x.160844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binks B (2002) Particles as surfactants—similarities and differences. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 7(1):21–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(02)00008-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradford SA, Torkzaban S (2008) Colloid transport and retention in unsaturated porous media: a review of interface-, collector-, and pore-scale processes and models. Vadose Zone J Soil Sci Soc 7(2):667.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0092 Google Scholar
  10. Cheraghian G, Hendraningrat L (2016) A review on applications of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery part A: effects of nanoparticles on interfacial tension. Int Nano Lett 6(2):129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40089-015-0173-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig FF (1971) The reservoir engineering aspects of waterflooding. H. L. Doherty memorial fund of AIME. http://store.spe.org/The-Reservoir-Engineering-Aspects-Of-Waterflooding–P68.aspx. Accessed 21 May 2017
  12. Daghio M et al (2017) Electrobioremediation of oil spills. Water Res 114:351–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hendraningrat L, Torsæter O (2015) A stabilizer that enhances the oil recovery process using silica-based nanofluids. Transp Porous Media 108(3):679–696.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-015-0495-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendraningrat L, Li S, Torsæter O (2013) A coreflood investigation of nanofluid enhanced oil recovery. J Pet Sci Eng 111:128–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science: principles and applications. Trends Food Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01001-7 Google Scholar
  16. Iglauer S et al (2011) Residual CO2 imaged with X-ray micro-tomography. Geophys Res Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl049680 Google Scholar
  17. Jeong S-W, Corapcioglu MY, Roosevelt SE (2000) Micromodel study of surfactant foam remediation of residual trichloroethylene. Am Chem Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ES9910558 Google Scholar
  18. Jin Y et al (2007) Toxicity of luminescent silica nanoparticles to living cells. Chem Res Toxicol 20(8):1126–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1021/tx7001959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Köhler M, Fritzsche W (2004) Nanotechnology: an introduction to nanostructuring techniques. Wiley, Hoboken.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527612369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar MNR et al (2004) Cationic silica nanoparticles as gene carriers: synthesis, characterization and transfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 4(7):876–881.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2004.120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li S, Torsæter O (2015) The impact of nanoparticles adsorption and transport on wettability alteration of intermediate wet berea sandstone. In: SPE-172943-MS. SPE. https://www.onepetro.org/download/conference-paper/SPE-172943-MS?id=conference-paper%2FSPE-172943-MS. Accessed 4 May 2017
  22. Macy R (1935) Surface tension by the ring method. Applicability of the du Nouy apparatus. J Chem Educ Div Chem Educ 12(12):573.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ed012p573 Google Scholar
  23. Metin CO et al (2011) Stability of aqueous silica nanoparticle dispersions. J Nanopart Res 13(2):839–850.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0085-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mulligan C, Yong R, Gibbs B (2001) Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review. Eng Geol 60(1):371–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00117-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Negin C, Ali S, Xie Q (2016) Application of nanotechnology for enhancing oil recovery—a review. Petroleum 2(4):324–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2016.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogolo N, Olafuyi O, Onyekonwu M (2012) Enhanced oil recovery using nanoparticles. In: Saudi Arabia section technical symposium and exhibition, p 9.  https://doi.org/10.2118/160847-ms
  27. Pak T (2015) Saturation tracking and identification of residual oil saturation. The University of Edinburgh. https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/17872. Accessed 4 May 2017
  28. Pak T et al (2015) Droplet fragmentation: 3D imaging of a previously unidentified pore-scale process during multiphase flow in porous media. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(7):1947–1952. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/7/1947.abstract
  29. Paria S (2008) Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soil and water. Adv Colloid Interface Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2007.11.001 Google Scholar
  30. Roustaei A, Saffarzadeh S, Mohammadi M (2013) An evaluation of modified silica nanoparticles’ efficiency in enhancing oil recovery of light and intermediate oil reservoirs. Egypt J Pet 22(3):427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2013.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santra S et al (2004) TAT conjugated, FITC doped silica nanoparticles for bioimaging applications. Chem Commun 24:2810–2811.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b411916a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Soga K, Pagea JW, Illangasekare T (2004) A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach. J Hazard Mater 110(1–3):13–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tosco T et al (2014) Nanoscale zerovalent iron particles for groundwater remediation: a review. J Clean Prod 77:10–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trellu C et al (2016) Removal of hydrophobic organic pollutants from soil washing/flushing solutions: a critical review. J Hazard Mater 306:149–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang C et al (2012) Retention and transport of silica nanoparticles in saturated porous media: effect of concentration and particle size. Environ Sci Technol 46(13):7151–7158.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es300314n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson J (1990) Laboratory investigation of residual liquid organics from spills, leaks, and the disposal of hazardous wastes in groundwater. In: Kerr R (ed) Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1990. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=wbVNKvmsOxsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR4&dq=Laboratory+investigation+of+residual+liquid+organics+from+spills,+leaks,+and+the+disposal+of+hazardous+wastes+in+groundwater&ots=vrcIBPD7w_&sig=4-29AfAVIZoFxWR9LcZtv3jF7vc. Accessed 14 July 2017
  37. Yu W, Xie H (2012) A review on nanofluids: preparation, stability mechanisms, and applications. J Nanomater 2012:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/435873 Google Scholar
  38. Zhang T et al (2014) Investigation of nanoparticle adsorption during transport in porous media. SPE J.  https://doi.org/10.2118/166346-pa Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teesside UniversityMiddlesbroughUK
  2. 2.Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS)CampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations