Abstract
The present study utilizes an artificial neural network (ANN) as an estimation model of biogas production from laboratory-scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors treating cattle manure with co-digestion of different organic wastes. It can be estimated depending on working days, influent chemical oxygen demand, influent pH, influent alkalinity, influent ammonia, influent total phosphorus, hydraulic retention time, waste adding ratio, pretreatment and additive waste sorts. The suitable architecture of an ANN for use in biogas prediction consists of 10 input factors, tangent sigmoid transfer function (tansig) at the four hidden layer neurons and a linear transfer function (purelin) at the output layer neuron. The R 2 was found to equal 0.89, 0.79 and 0.75 in the training, validation and testing steps, respectively. ANN estimation modeling can effectively predict the biogas production performance of laboratory-scale UASB reactors. These results indicate that biogas production was optimized to occur in the 20–30% addition range with different organic wastes.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu Qdais H, Hani KB, Shatnawi N (2010) Modeling and optimization of biogas production from a waste digester using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Resour Conserv Recy 54:359–363. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.012
Apha A (2005) Standards methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC
Bunsan S, Chen WY, Chen HW, Chuang YH, Grisdanurak N (2013) Modeling the dioxin emission of a municipal solid waste incinerator using neural networks. Chemosphere 92:258–264. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.083
Dalkılıç K, Uğurlu A (2015) Biogas production from chicken manure at different organic loading rates in a mesophilic-thermopilic two stage anaerobic system. J Biosci Bioeng 120:315–322. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.01.021
Güçlü D, Yılmaz N, Özkan-Yücel UG (2011) Application of neural network prediction model to full-scale anaerobic sludge digestion. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:691–698. doi:10.1002/jctb.2569
Hamed MM, Khalafallah MG, Hassanien EA (2004) Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks. Environ Modell Softw 19:919–928. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.10.005
Hu W, Thayanithy K, Forster C (2002) A kinetic study of the anaerobic digestion of ice-cream wastewater. Process Biochem 37:965–971. doi:10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00310-7
Jaroenpoj S, Yu J, Ness J (2015) Development of artificial neural network models for biogas production from co-digestion of leachate and pineapple peel. Glob Environ Eng 1:42–47
Kana EBG, Oloke JK, Lateef A, Adesiyan MO (2012) Modeling and optimization of biogas production on saw dust and other co-substrates using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Renew Energy 46:276–281. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.027
Kanat G, Saral A (2009) Estimation of Biogas production rate in a thermophilic UASB reactor using artificial neural networks. Environ Model Assess 14:607–614. doi:10.1007/s10666-008-9150-x
Lauwers J, Appels L, Thompson IP, Degrève J, Van Impe JF, Dewil R (2013) Mathematical modelling of anaerobic digestion of biomass and waste: power and limitations. Prog Energy Combust Sci 39:383–402. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2013.03.003
Møller MF (1993) A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw 6:525–533. doi:10.7146/dpb.v19i339.6570
Özkaya B, Demir A, Bilgili MS (2007) Neural network prediction model for the methane fraction in biogas from field-scale landfill bioreactors. Environ Modell Softw 22:815–822. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.03.004
Parthiban R, Iyer PVR, Sekaran G (2007) Anaerobic digestion in tapered fluidized bed reactor and modeling using radial basis function neural network. Biotechnology 6(4):534–542. doi:10.3923/biotech.2007.534.542
Şahinkaya E (2009) Biotreatment of zinc-containing wastewater in a sulfidogenic CSTR: performance and artificial neural network (ANN) modelling studies. J Hazard Mater 164:105–113. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.130
Tufaner F (2015) Investigation of improving biomethanization processes of cattle manure. Phd thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul
Tufaner F, Avşar Y (2016a) Investigation of Biogas production potential and adaptation to cattle manure of anaerobic flocular sludge seed. Sigma 7:183–190
Tufaner F, Avşar Y (2016b) Effects of co-substrate on biogas production from cattle manure: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:2303–2312. doi:10.1007/s13762-016-1069-1
Willmott CJ (1984) On the evaluation of model performance in physical geography, spatial statistics and models. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 443–460. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3048-8_23
Yetilmezsoy K, Demirel S (2008) Artificial neural network (ANN) approach for modeling of Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solution by antep pistachio (Pistacia Vera L.) shells. J Hazard Mater 153:1288–1300. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.092
Yetilmezsoy K, Turkdogan FI, Temizel I, Gunay A (2013) Development of ANN-based models to predict Biogas and methane productions in anaerobic treatment of molasses wastewater. Int J Green Energy 10:885–907. doi:10.1080/15435075.2012.727116
Zakaria Z, Isa NAM, Suandi SA (2010) A study on neural network training algorithm for multiface detection in static images. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 62:170–173
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Adiyaman University (Project Number MÜFBAP2013-0001). The corresponding author would like to thank The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for support under the BIDEB-2211-C Domestic Ph.D. Scholarship Program Intended for Priority Areas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study is part of the Ph.D. thesis of FatihTufaner.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tufaner, F., Avşar, Y. & Gönüllü, M.T. Modeling of biogas production from cattle manure with co-digestion of different organic wastes using an artificial neural network. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19, 2255–2264 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1413-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1413-2