Abstract
Advancements in modern society are reflected in urban construction and development. Transformation in urban industrial ecology is inevitable in light of environmental problems caused by development arising from economic growth. In this study, 30 provincial cities from mainland China were selected to test an index system for evaluating urban industrial ecological transformation; this index takes into account the situations of industrial development in all 289 cities at the prefecture level and above. Urban industrial ecologicalization was calculated based on the level of construction in China from 2003 to 2012, and the overall condition of urban industrial ecological transformation was determined based on an evaluation of each city, province, and region. Forty percent of the 30 provincial cities possessed mid- or high-level composite indexes of industrial ecological transformation, and half possessed indexes higher than the average of their corresponding provinces. Furthermore, environmental efficiency increased significantly in some cities in response to industrial ecological transformation, with the Central region having the highest composite, followed in succession by the Eastern, Northeastern, and Western regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The quantitative criterion for pollutant discharge is the discharge of three kinds of industrial wastes, and for pollution control, it is the product value of the comprehensive utilization of the “three wastes.”
Economic location refers to economic growth zone or economic growth point and coverage under its influence in from a geographic perspective.
References
Ayres RU (1989) Industrial metabolism. Technology and Environment. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Buergelt PT, Paton D (2014) An ecological risk management and capacity building model. Hum Ecol 42:591–603
Cabezas H, Pawlowski CW, Mayer AL, Hoagland NT (2005) Simulated experiments with complex sustainable systems: ecology and technology. Resour Conserv Recycl 44:279–291
Cerceau J, Mat N, Junqua G, Lin L, Laforest V, Gonzalez C (2014) Implementing industrial ecology in port cities: international overview of case studies and cross-case analysis. J Clean Prod 74:1–16
Conticelli E, Tondelli S (2012) Application of strategic environmental assessment to eco-industrial parks: Raibano case in Italy. J Urban Plan Dev 139:185–196
Deutz P, Ioppolo G (2015) From theory to practice: enhancing the potential policy impact of industrial ecology. Sustainability 7:2259–2273
Dong H, Dai H, Dong L et al (2015) Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: a provincial leveled analysis. Appl Energy 144:165–174
Duchin F, Levine SH (2006) Human ecology: industrial ecology. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Economics, New York
Dunn BC, Steinemann A (1998) Industrial ecology for sustainable communities. J Environ Plan Manag 41:661–672
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, Roos P (1994) Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output index approach. In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin A, Seiford L (eds) Data envelopment analysis: theory: Methodology and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 253–272
Frosch RA, Gallopoulos NE (1989) Strategies for manufacturing. Sci Am 261:144–152
Gerber L, Fazlollahi S, Maréchal F (2013) A systematic methodology for the environment design and synthesis of energy systems combining process integration, life cycle assessment and industrial ecology. Comput Chem Eng 59:2–16
Gibbs D, Deutz P (2007) Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development. J Clean Prod 15:1683–1695
Graedel TE (1996) On the concept of industrial ecology. Ann Rev Energy Environ 21:69–98
Graedel TE, Allenby BR (1995) Industrial ecology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hao H, Geng Y, Hang W (2015) GHG emissions from primary aluminum production in China: regional disparity and policy implications. Appl Energy. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.056
Hart R (2004) Growth, environment and innovation—a model with production vintages and environmentally oriented research. J Environ Econ Manag 48:1078–1098
Korhonen J, Snäkin JP (2005) Analyzing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: concepts and application. Ecol Econ 52:169–186
Liu C, Zhang K (2013) Industrial ecology and water utilization of the marine chemical industry: a case study of Hai Hua Group (HHG), China. Resour Conserv Recycl 70:78–85
Lowe E (1993) Industrial ecology—an organizing framework for environmental management. Environ Qual Manag 3:73–85
Neumann K, Hilderink H (2015) Opportunities and challenges for investigating the environment-migration nexus. Hum Ecol 43:309–322
Patterson TM, Niccolucci V, Bastianoni S (2007) Beyond “more is better”: ecological footprint accounting for tourism and consumption in Val di Merse, Italy. Ecol Econ 62:747–756
Roberts BH (2004) The application of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of eco-industrial parks: an Australian case study. J Clean Prod 12:997–1010
Schiller F, Penn AS, Basson L (2014) Analyzing networks in industrial ecology—a review of social-material network analyses. J Clean Prod 76:1–11
Song M, An Q, Zhang W, Wang Z, Wu J (2012) Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4465–4469
Suh S, Kagawa S (2005) Industrial ecology and input-output economics: an introduction. Econ Syst Res 17:349–364
Tone K (2002) The slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 143:32–41
Tone K (2004) Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: a slacks-based measure (SBM) approach. Presentation at NAPW III, Toronto, pp 44–45
Tseng M-L, Chiu AS (2013) Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic references. J Clean Prod 40:22–31
Tseng M-L, Tan RR, Siriban-Manalang AB (2013) Sustainable consumption and production for Asia: sustainability through green design and practice. J Clean Prod 40:1–5
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Major Projects in Philosophy and Social Science Research of the Ministry of Education of China [Grant No. 14JZD031]; the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [Grant No. NCET-12-0595]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Nos. 71171001 and 71471001]; and Key Projects in Philosophy and Social Science of Anhui, China [Grant No. AHSKZ2014D01].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, M., Guan, Y., Wang, J. et al. Evaluation of urban industrial ecological transformation in China. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 2649–2662 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1184-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1184-1