Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A quantitative risk analysis for the vegetable oil industry in Mexico

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In industrializing countries, the rapid population growth frequently tends to reach the vicinity of the industrial parks, yielding an imminent hazard to the residents in the case of the occurrence of an accident. In the case of Mexico, particularly in the city of Morelia, the industries associated to the vegetable oil and margarine, originally located far from the city, have been absorbed by the city due to the high population growth. It should be noticed that this industry represents a high hazard because it uses huge amounts of hydrogen and LP gas. Therefore, to determine the potential impact of an accident for the people within and around these industries, this paper presents a quantitative risk analysis applied to the vegetable oil refining industry in Morelia. The main objective is the identification of the facilities with the highest hazard, as well as the risk analysis to the personnel inside and the people leaving around the plant. According to the quantitative risk analysis, the hydrogen processing and storage units are the most dangerous facilities inside the plant. Moreover, the identified potential accidents were boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion, flash fire, jet fire, and vapor cloud explosion, which were evaluated through the software SCRI. Furthermore, an inherent approach was applied to propose alternatives for risk reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abuswer M, Amyotte P, Khan F (2013) A quantitative risk management framework for dust and hybrid mixture explosions. J Loss Prevent Process Ind 26:283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AICHE/CCPS (2000) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, 2nd edn. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arturson G (1987) The tragedy of San Juanico-the most severe LPG disaster in history. Burns 13(2):87–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baesi S, Abdolhamidzadeh B, Hassan C, Hamid MD, Reniers G (2013) Application of a multi-plant QRA: a case study investigating the risk impact of the construction of a new plant on an existing chemical plant’s risk levels. J Loss Prevent Process Ind 26:895–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry B (2011) The 2010 BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill: implications for theory of organizational disaster. Technol Soc 33:244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernechea EJ, Arnaldos J (2014) Optimizing the design of storage facilities through the application of ISD and QRA. Process Saf Environ Prot 92:598–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvicini S, Antonioni G, Morra P, Cozzani V (2015) Quantitative assessment of environmental risk due to accidental spills from onshore pipelines. Process Saf Environ Prot 93:31–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crowl DA, Louvar JF (2011) Chemical process safety fundamentals with applications, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Ovalle C, Vazquez-Roman R, Mannan MS (2009) A comparison of deterministic and stochastic approaches to solve the facility layout problem with toxic releases computer. Comput Aided Chem Eng 26:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd D, Frank F, Fowler E, Troup C, Milton R (1987) Biological effects of short-term, high-concentration exposure to methyl isocyanate. I. Study objectives and inhalation exposure design. Environ Health Perspect 72:13–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman I (2011) Bhopal gas catastrophe. 1984: causes and consequences. Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, Elsevier, pp 302–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrocino G, Iervolino I, Orlando F, Salzano E (2005) Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas. J Hazard Materials 1–3:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haag UPAM, Ale BJM (2005) Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment, Purple Book, Part one. Establishments, Publicatiereeks; Gevaarlijke Stoffen, The Hage

    Google Scholar 

  • Han ZY, Weng WG (2011) Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. J Hazard Materials 189:509–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Vargas J, Martinez-Gomez J, González-Campos JB, Lara-Romero J, Ponce-Ortega JM (2015) An optimization approach for producing carbon nanotubes involving economic and safety objectives. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-015-0942-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo YD, Ahn BJ (2005) A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. J Hazard Materials 123:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung S, Ng D, Laird C, Mannan MS (2010) A new approach for facility siting using mapping risks on a plant grid area and optimization. J Loss Prevent Process Ind 23:824–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung S, Ng D, Diaz-Ovalle C, Vazquez-Roman R, Mannan MS (2011) New approach to optimizing the facility siting and layout for fire and explosion scenarios. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:3928–3937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazantzi V, El-Halwagi AM, Kazantzis N, El-Halwagi MM (2013) Managing uncertainties in a safety-constrained process system for solvent selection and usage: an optimization approach with technical, economic, and risk factors. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:213–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FI, Haddara MR (2004) Risk-based maintenance of ethylene oxide production facilities. J Hazard Mater 108:147–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kletz T (1999) HAZOP and HAZAN identifying and assessing process industry hazards, 4th edn. Institution of Chemical Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Rapik Saat M, Barkan CPL (2013) Integrated risk reduction framework to improve railway hazardous materials transportation safety. J Hazard Mater 260:131–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Gomez J, Nápoles-Rivera F, Ponce-Ortega JM, Serna-González M, El-Halwagi MM (2014) Optimization of facility siting and unit relocation with the simultaneous consideration of economic and safety issues. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:3950–3958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ordouei MH, Elkamel A, Al-Sharrah G (2014) New simple indices for risk assessment and hazards reduction at the conceptual design stage of a chemical process. Chem Eng Sci 119:218–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandian S, Hassim MH, Ng RTL, Hurme M (2015) Designing and inherently healthier process based on inherently safer design (ISD) concept: research and development stage. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-015-0951-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazoglou AI, Aneziris O, Konstandinidou M, Giakoumatos I (2009) Accident sequence analysis for sites producing and storing explosives. Accid Anal Prevent 41:1145–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCRI (2013). http://www.dinamicaheuristica.com/index.html. Accessed Dec, 2014

  • Shariff AM, Zini S (2013) Using integrated toxic release consequences analysis tool for inherently safer design of process plant at preliminary design stage. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:851–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topuz E, Talinli I, Aydin E (2011) Integration of environmental and human health risk assessment for industries using hazardous materials: a quantitative multi criteria approach for environmental decision makers. Environ Intern 37:393–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varma D, Ferguson J, Alarie Y (1987) Reproductive toxicity of methyl isocyanate in mice. J Toxicol Environ Health 3:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhiyong LI, Xiangmin P, Jianxin MA (2011) Quantitative risk assessment on 2010 Expo hydrogen station. Intern J Hydrog Energy 36:4079–4086

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Mexican Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT) and the Scientific Research Council of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemical Engineering Department, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, 58060, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico

    Lizeth Valencia-Barragán, Juan Martinez-Gomez & José María Ponce-Ortega

Authors
  1. Lizeth Valencia-Barragán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Martinez-Gomez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José María Ponce-Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José María Ponce-Ortega.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valencia-Barragán, L., Martinez-Gomez, J. & Ponce-Ortega, J.M. A quantitative risk analysis for the vegetable oil industry in Mexico. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 245–256 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1011-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1011-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation