Skip to main content
Log in

Co-production of power and urea from coal with CO2 capture: performance assessment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coal-based power plants are largest emitter of CO2 as a single sector. To use fossil fuels (including coal), CO2 capture and storage is a visible option. But large energy requirement for this process and risk associated with storage of CO2 demand alternative solutions including recycling of captured CO2. In this paper, a co-production of power and urea is proposed using coal with captured CO2. Detailed ASPEN Plus® model is developed for this plant. As shift reaction for producing H2 has significant effect on output parameters, analysis is done for two different values of shift reaction, i.e., 90 and 95 % conversion. Plant consumes substantial auxiliary power (~19 % for the base case). Auxiliary power becomes a minimum for about 25 % captured CO2 utilization for 95 % shift conversion. An economy factor is also defined to estimate the economic advantage of utilizing captured CO2. Results show that economic advantage is obtained for CO2 utilization beyond ~5 % for 95 % water gas shift reaction and it is beyond ~10 % for a 90 % shift reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin GT (1984) Shreve’s chemical process industries, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin MFD, Tan RR, Razon LF (2014) A methodology for criticality analysis in integrated energy systems. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0846-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen S, Koper M, Deng YY (2012) The role of bioenergy in a fully sustainable global energy system. Biomass Bioenergy 41:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetland J (2009) Assessment of pre combustion decarbonization schemes for polygeneration from fossil fuels. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11:37–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2011) International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) IPCC fifth assessment report. Climate change (AR5). www.ipcc.ch/ Accessed date 09 Jun 2014

  • Jana K, De S (2014) Polygeneration performance assessments: multi-dimensional viewpoint. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0885-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Jana K, De S (2015a) Polygeneration using agricultural waste: thermodynamic and economic feasibility study. Renewable Energy 74:648–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jana K, De S (2015b) Techno-economic evaluation of a polygeneration—a case study for an Indian district. Bioresour Technol 181:163–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klemes JJ, Varbanov PS (2013) Process intensification and integration: an assessment. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Ammonia Plant (2013) presentation 17 April. Inctec Pivot Limited, Dyno Nobel, Inctec Pivot Fertilisers. phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item = UGFyZW50SUQ9MTgwNDQwfENoaWxkSUQ9LTF8VHlwZT0z&t = 1. Accessed date 09 Jun 2014

  • Ng KS, Zhang N, Sadhukhan J (2012) Decarbonised coal energy system advancement through CO2 utilisation and polygeneration. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14:443–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng KS, Zhang N, Sadhukhan J (2013) Techno-economic analysis of polygeneration systems with carbon capture and storage and CO2 reuse. Chem Eng J 219:96–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordbotten JM, Kavetski D, Celia MA, Bachu S (2009) Model for CO2 leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells. Environ Sci Technol 43(3):743–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Open EI (2014) Transparent cost database. http://en.openei.org/apps/TCDB/ Accessed date 09 Jun 2014

  • Rusinak D, Alabi S, Arana J, Moscoso E, Yazvin O (2014) Production of Prilled Urea. http://teamecho.wikispaces.com Accessed date 09 Jun 2014

  • Spliethoff H (2010) Power generation from solid fuels. Springer, Berlin

  • ZEP (2011) The Costs of CO2 capture, transport and storage: post-demonstration CCS in the EU European energy technology platform for zero emission fossil fuel power plants. Zero emissions platform. www.zeroemissionsplatform.eu/. Accessed date 09 Jun 2014

  • Zhang X, Gundersen T, Roussanaly S, Brunsvold AL, Zhang S (2013) Carbon chain analysis on a coal IGCC—CCS system with flexible multi-products. Fuel Process Technol 108:146–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Kuntal Jana acknowledges to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR-New Delhi, India) for awarding Senior Research Fellowship for this research toward PhD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudipta De.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bose, A., Jana, K., Mitra, D. et al. Co-production of power and urea from coal with CO2 capture: performance assessment. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17, 1271–1280 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0960-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0960-7

Keywords

Navigation