Skip to main content
Log in

Study of impact on surface water and groundwater around flow fields due to changes in river stage using groundwater modeling system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Excessive ground water withdrawal can lead to ground water depletion, and this may have serious social and economic consequences. Attempts to limit groundwater pumping have been commonly based on the concept of safe yield. In this study, in order to evaluate safe yield, short- and long-duration pumping tests have been performed at four different sites (Purulia District, India) on Damodar River bed. The lithological survey was carried out along the river bed at regular intervals from 500 m to 10.5 km, covering a total stretch of 10-km up-stream and 0.5-km down-stream, to determine the soil profile and other soil characteristics. The points, where the maximum depth of porous medium was obtained, were selected for carrying out the pumping yield tests. The appropriate hydrogeologic approaches were employed to estimate the values of aquifer parameters, viz., specific yield (S y), transmissivity(T), and hydraulic conductivity (K) for the aforesaid sites under study, which were found to be in the range of 0.043–0.175, 2082–3983, and 219–603 m/day, respectively. A hypothetical aquifer-stream water interaction system has been developed using GMS software (groundwater modeling system) not only to represent the hydraulic head fluctuations in the groundwater system around well fields but also to quantify the flow rate due to change in river stage, recharge due to rainfall, and also to determine how the surface water could affect groundwater due to pumping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Al-Sha’r WI, Hatamles RI (2007) Using MODFLOW and MT3D groundwater flow and transports models as a management tool for the Azraq groundwater systems. Jordan J Civ Eng 1(2):153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Akindunni FF, Gillham RW (1992) Unsaturated and saturated flow in response to pumping of an unconfined aquifer: numerical investigation of delayed drainage. Ground Water 30(6):873–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley WM, Leake SA (2004) The journey from safe yield to sustainability. Ground Water 42(1):12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee G (2012) Groundwater abstraction through river-bed collector well: a case study based on geophysical and hydrologic investigation. Clean Tech Environ Policy 14:573–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow PM, Ahlfeld DP, Dickerman DC (2003) Conjunctive-management models for sustained yield of stream–aquifer systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 129(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan MJ, Endres AL, Rudolph DL, Parkin G (2005) A field scale study of pumping-induced drainage and recovery in an unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 315:52–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjya RK, Barma SD (2009) Modeling the effect of stream flow on groundwater flow fields using GMS. J Appl Hydrol 22(3&4):172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn MI, Rudolph DL, Endres AL, Jones JP (2011) Field observation of the response to pumping and recovery in the water table region of an unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 403:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater Modeling System 6.0 (2006), Brigham Young University, Technical Support by Environmental Modeling System, Inc., Utah, USA

  • Groundwater Resource Estimation Methodology (GEC) (1997) Report of the groundwater resource estimation committee. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushwaha RK, Pandit MK, Goyal R (2009) MODFLOW based groundwater resource evaluation and prediction in Mendha subbasin, NE Rajasthan. J Geol Soc India 74:449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maimone M (2004) Defining and managing sustainable yield. Ground Water 42(6):809–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maréchal JC, Vouillamoz JM, Kumar MSM, Dewandel B (2010) Estimating aquifer thickness using multiple pumping tests. Hydrogeol J 18(8):1787–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moench AF (1994) Specific yield as determined by type-curve analysis of aquifer-test data. Ground Water 32(6):949–957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP (1979) Perspective on delayed yield. Water Resour Res 15:899–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwankwor GI, Cherry JA, Gillham RW (1984) A comparative study of specific yield determinations for a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water 22:764–772

  • Osman YZ, Bruen MP (2002) Modeling stream–aquifer seepage in an alluvial aquifer: an improved loosing-stream package for MODFLOW. J Hydrol 264:69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz FW, Zhang H (2003) Fundamentals of ground water. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 219–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Seward P, Xu Y, Brendock L (2006) Sustainable groundwater use, the capture principle, and adaptive management. Water SA 32(4):473–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10(1):52–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theis CV (1940) The source of water derived from wells: essential factors controlling the response of an aquifer to development. Civ Eng 10(5):277–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd DK (2010) Groundwater hydrology, Second edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 64–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Valerio, AM(2008). Modeling groundwater-surface water interactions in an operational setting by linking riverware with modflow, Thesis of Master of Science, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Michigan

  • Wang W, Li J, Feng X, Chen X, Yao K (2011) Evolution of stream–aquifer hydrologic connectedness during pumping: experiment. J Hydrol 42:401–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woessner WW (2000) Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Ground Water 38(3):423–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project “Hydrogeologic Study of Subsurface Water Flow/Storage Characteristics for Creation of Sustainable Source on Rainfed River for SemiArid and Fluoride affected Blocks in connection with comprehensive Water Security Plan for Damodar and Kangsabati River under Purulia District” was awarded to the School of Water Resources Engineering, Jadavpur University by the Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of West Bengal. The authors are grateful to the Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of West Bengal for their confidence reposed on them for this type of research work. The authors gratefully acknowledge the kind cooperation and support during the field survey of this project. from the officers, PHED Purulia Division, Govt. of West Bengal and all the other staffs of PHED Purulia Division, Govt. of West Bengal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Roy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, P.K., Roy, S.S., Giri, A. et al. Study of impact on surface water and groundwater around flow fields due to changes in river stage using groundwater modeling system. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17, 145–154 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0769-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0769-9

Keywords

Navigation