Skip to main content
Log in

Water integration in industrial zones: a spatial representation with direct recycle applications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work introduces a representation of spatial aspects within industrial zones, which can be applied to problems involving any type of water integration strategies. The representation is flexible and takes into consideration the respective plant locations, and any barriers that exist in between. Moreover, industrial city corridors that are allocated for water transport have also been accounted for. This allows effective water integration and matching among available water streams using a spatially constrained approach that utilizes the shortest path options available. The proposed representation has been illustrated using direct recycling integration strategies, which in turn are commonly recognized to employ the simplest techniques for water integration, as a first instance. A case study involving several water using and producing processes that belong to a group of plants all operating in a common industrial zone have been carried out as a demonstration, for which several different scenarios were studied. In doing so, cost-effective water network designs that involve attractive wastewater reuse schemes among adjacent and nearby processing facilities have been identified, while considering spatial constraints for water transport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

p :

Plant/process

i :

Water source

j :

Water sink

c :

Contaminant

P :

Set of plants/processes in industrial city

SU p :

Set of water sources in plant p

SN p :

Set of water sinks in plant p

C :

Set of contaminants/pollutants

\(z_{cjp}^{ \hbox{min} }\) :

Minimum permissible pollutant c composition in sink j, plant p (ppm)

\(z_{cjp}^{ \hbox{max} }\) :

Maximum permissible pollutant c composition in sink j, plant p (ppm)

\(G_{jp}\) :

Flowrate required in sink j, plant p (kg/h)

\(W_{ip}\) :

Flowrate available in source i, plant p (kg/h)

\(x_{c,ip}^{\text{Source}}\) :

Pollutant c composition in source i, plant p (ppm)

\(x_{c}^{\text{FRESH}}\) :

Pollutant c composition in external freshwater (ppm)

\(\varepsilon\) :

Pipe roughness

\(K_{\text{ex}}\) :

Expansion loss at pipe exit

\(K_{c}\) :

Contraction loss at pipe entrance

\(K_{b}\) :

Loss at pipe elbow/bend

\(\rho\) :

Density (kg/m3)

\(\mu\) :

Viscosity (kg/ms)

a :

Coefficient associated with piping cost calculations

b :

Power coefficient associated with piping cost calculations

\(C^{\text{FRESH}}\) :

Cost of freshwater ($/ton)

\(H_{y}\) :

Operating hours per year (h/year)

\(\gamma\) :

Annualized piping cost factor (year−1)

\(\eta\) :

Efficiency

\(z_{cjp}^{\text{in}}\) :

Pollutant c composition in sink j, plant p

\(M_{ipjp'}\) :

Mass flowrate from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(F_{jp}\) :

External freshwater mass flowrate required in sink j, plant p

\(D_{ip}\) :

Wastewater mass flowrate discharged by source i, plant p

\(L_{ipjp'}\) :

Length of pipe from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(L_{ip}\) :

Length of pipe carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(L_{jp}\) :

Length of pipe carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\({\text{DI}}_{ipjp'}\) :

Calculated diameter of pipe from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\({\text{DI}}_{ip}\) :

Calculated diameter of pipe carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\({\text{DI}}_{jp}\) :

Calculated diameter of pipe carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\({\text{DI}}_{ipjp'}^{c}\) :

Custom diameter of pipe, based on rounding the calculated value, from source i plant p to sink j plant p

\({\text{DI}}_{ip}^{c}\) :

Custom diameter of pipe, based on rounding the calculated value, carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\({\text{DI}}_{jp}^{c}\) :

Custom diameter of pipe, based on rounding the calculated value, carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\(N_{ipjp'}^{E}\) :

Number of elbows/bends in pipe from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(N_{ip}^{E}\) :

Number of elbows/bends in pipe carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(N_{jp}^{E}\) :

Number of elbows/bends in pipe carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\(N_{{Re_{ipjp'} }}\) :

Reynolds’s number of stream from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(N_{{Re_{ip} }}\) :

Reynolds’s number of stream carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(N_{{Re_{jp} }}\) :

Reynolds’s number of stream carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\(v_{ipjp'}\) :

Velocity of stream from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(v_{ip}\) :

Velocity of stream carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(v_{jp}\) :

Velocity of stream carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\(f_{ipjp'}\) :

Fanning friction factor of stream from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(f_{ip}\) :

Fanning friction factor of stream carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(f_{jp}\) :

Fanning friction factor of stream carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\(A_{ipjp'}\) :

Parameter based on Churchill’s equation for fanning friction factor calculations associated with water stream from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(A_{ip}\) :

Parameter based on Churchill’s equation for fanning friction factor calculations associated with water stream carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(A_{jp}\) :

Parameter based on Churchill’s equation for fanning friction factor calculations associated with water stream carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\(\Delta F_{ipjp'}^{f}\) :

Friction losses associated with pipe carrying water from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(\Delta F_{ip}^{f}\) :

Friction losses associated with pipe carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(\Delta F_{jp}^{f}\) :

Friction losses associated with water stream carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\(\Delta P_{ipjp'}^{\text{Drop}}\) :

Pressure drop due to friction, associated with pipe carrying water from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(\Delta P_{ip}^{\text{Drop}}\) :

Pressure drop due to friction, associated with pipe carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(\Delta P_{jp}^{\text{Drop}}\) :

Pressure drop due to friction, associated with pipe carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

\(P_{ip,jp'}^{w}\) :

Shaft power required to overcome pressure drop in pipe carrying water from source i, plant p to sink j plant p

\(P_{ip}^{w}\) :

Shaft power required to overcome pressure drop in pipe carrying unused wastewater from source i, plant p to mainstream waste

\(P_{jp}^{w}\) :

Shaft power required to overcome pressure drop in pipe carrying freshwater from mainstream to sink j, plant p

References

  • Almutlaq AM, El-Halwagi MM (2007) An algebraic targeting approach to resource conservation via material recycle/reuse. Int J Environ Pollut 29(1):4–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alva-Argáez A, Kokossis AC, Smith R (1998) Wastewater minimisation of industrial systems using an integrated approach. Comput Chem Eng 22, Supplement 1 (0):S741–S744. doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00138-0

  • Aviso K, Tan R, Culaba A (2010a) Designing eco-industrial water exchange networks using fuzzy mathematical programming. Clean Technol Environ Policy 12(4):353–363. doi:10.1007/s10098-009-0252-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aviso KB, Tan RR, Culaba AB, Cruz JB Jr (2010b) Bi-level fuzzy optimization approach for water exchange in eco-industrial parks. Process Safety Environ Prot 88(1):31–40. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2009.11.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boix M, Montastruc L, Pibouleau L, Azzaro-Pantel C, Domenech S (2012) Industrial water management by multiobjective optimization: from individual to collective solution through eco-industrial parks. J Clean Prod 22(1):85–97. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnes BA, Ford DL, Brady SO (1973) Treatment of refinery wastewaters for reuse. In: The national conference on complete water reuse, Washington, DC

  • Chew IML, Tan R, Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Majozi T, Gouws J (2008) Synthesis of direct and indirect interplant water network. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(23):9485–9496. doi:10.1021/ie800072r

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chew IML, Tan RR, Foo DCY, Chiu ASF (2009) Game theory approach to the analysis of inter-plant water integration in an eco-industrial park. J Clean Prod 17(18):1611–1619. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew IML, Foo DCY, Ng DKS, Tan RR (2010a) Flowrate targeting algorithm for interplant resource conservation network. Part 1: unassisted integration scheme. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(14):6439–6455. doi:10.1021/ie901802m

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chew IML, Foo DCY, Tan RR (2010b) Flowrate targeting algorithm for interplant resource conservation network. Part 2: assisted integration scheme. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(14):6456–6468. doi:10.1021/ie901804z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C (2009) Introduction to algorithms (International edition). Prentice Hall India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté RP, Cohen-Rosenthal E (1998) Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences. J Clean Prod 6(3–4):181–188. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00029-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté R, Hall J (1995) Industrial parks as ecosystems. J Clean Prod 3(1–2):41–46. doi:10.1016/0959-6526(95)00041-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damak N (2010) Distance problems in networks—theory and practice. Classical shortest-path algorithms

  • de Faria DC, de Souza AAU, de Souza SMAGU (2009) Optimization of water networks in industrial processes. J Clean Prod 17(9):857–862. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhole VR, Ramchandani N, Tainsh RA, Wasilewski M (1996) Make your process water pay for itself. Chem Eng J 103(1):100–103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1:269–271. doi:10.1007/BF01386390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra’s shortest path-algorithm in PHP including an implementation of a priority queue to support it. http://github.com/kay/PHP-Dijkstra. Accessed 27 Feb 2014

  • Doyle SJ, Smith R (1997) Targeting water reuse with multiple contaminants. Trans Int Chem Eng B 75(3):181–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Halwagi MM, Manousiouthakis V (1989a) Synthesis of mass exchange networks. AIChE J 35(8):1233–1244. doi:10.1002/aic.690350802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Halwagi MM, Manousiouthakis V (1989b) Design and analysis of mass-exchange networks with multicomponent targets. In: The American Institute of Chemical Engineering Annual Meeting, San Francisco

  • El-Halwagi MM, Manousiouthakis V (1990a) Automatic synthesis of mass-exchange networks with single-component targets. Chem Eng Sci 45(9):2813–2831. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(90)80175-E

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Halwagi MM, Manousiouthakis V (1990b) Simultaneous synthesis of mass-exchange and regeneration networks. AIChE J 36(8):1209–1219. doi:10.1002/aic.690360810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Halwagi MM, Gabriel F, Harell D (2003) Rigorous graphical targeting for resource conservation via material recycle/reuse networks. Ind Eng Chem Res 42(19):4319–4328. doi:10.1021/ie030318a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foo DCY (2009) State-of-the-art review of pinch analysis techniques for water network synthesis. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(11):5125–5159. doi:10.1021/ie801264c

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geankoplis CJ (2008) Transport processes and separation process principles. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler N (1995) Industrial ecosystems: developing sustainable industrial structures. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallale N (2002) A new graphical targeting method for water minimisation. Adv Environ Res 6(3):377–390. doi:10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00116-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hospondarec RW, Thompson SJ (1974) Oil-steam system for water reuse. In: The American Institute of Chemical Engineering workshop (AIChE), New Orleans

  • Kim SH, Yoon S-G, Chae SH, Park S (2010) Economic and environmental optimization of a multi-site utility network for an industrial complex. J Environ Manag 91(3):690–705. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo WCJ, Smith R (1997) Effluent treatment system design. Chem Eng Sci 52(23):4273–4290. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00186-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo WCJ, Smith R (1998) Wastewater minimization of industrial systems using an integrated approach. Trans Int Chem Eng A 76:287–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J-Y, Chen C-L, Lin C-Y, Foo DCY (2013) A two-stage approach for the synthesis of inter-plant water networks involving continuous and batch units. Chem Eng Res Des. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2013.08.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin A (2007) Introduction to the design & analysis of algorithms. Pearson Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao ZW, Wu JT, Jiang BB, Wang JD, Yang YR (2007) Design methodology for flexible multiple plant water networks. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(14):4954–4963. doi:10.1021/ie061299i

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim S-R, Park JM (2009) Interfactory and intrafactory water network system to remodel a conventional industrial park to a green eco-industrial park. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(3):1351–1358. doi:10.1021/ie9014233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindo Systems, What’sBest! 9.0—excel add-in for linear, nonlinear, and integer modeling and optimization. http://www.lindo.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=11. Accessed 26 Feb 2014

  • Linnhoff B, Flower JR (1978) Synthesis of heat exchanger networks: I. Systematic generation of energy optimal networks. AIChE J 24(4):633–642. doi:10.1002/aic.690240411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linnhoff B, Hindmarsh E (1983) The pinch design method for heat exchanger networks. Chem Eng Sci 38(5):745–763. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(83)80185-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelady EM, El-Halwagi MM (2009) Design and integration of eco-industrial parks for managing water resources. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 28(2):265–272. doi:10.1002/ep.10326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manan ZA, Tan YL, Foo DCY (2004) Targeting the minimum water flow rate using water cascade analysis technique. AIChE J 50(12):3169–3183. doi:10.1002/aic.10235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra PN, Fan LT, Erickson LE (1975) Application of mathematical optimization techniques in computer aided design of wastewater treatment systems. Water (II). In: American Institute of Chemical Engineering Symposium Series (AIChE), New York, vol 145, p 136–153

  • Olesen SG, Polley GT (1997) A simple methodology for the design of water networks handling single contaminants. Trans Inst Chem Eng A 75:420–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE (2003) Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, International edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Poplewski G, Wałczyk K, Jeżowski J (2010) Optimization-based method for calculating water networks with user specified characteristics. Chem Eng Res Des 88(1):109–120. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2009.07.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash R, Shenoy UV (2005) Targeting and design of water networks for fixed flowrate and fixed contaminant load operations. Chem Eng Sci 60(1):255–268. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2004.08.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Castro E, Ponce-Ortega JM, Serna-González M, Jiménez-Gutiérrez A, El-Halwagi MM (2011) A global optimal formulation for the water integration in eco-industrial parks considering multiple pollutants. Comput Chem Eng 35(8):1558–1574. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.03.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Castro E, Ponce-Ortega JM, Serna-González M, El-Halwagi MM (2012) Optimal reconfiguration of multi-plant water networks into an eco-industrial park. Comput Chem Eng 44:58–83. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.05.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sane M, Atkins US (1977) Industrial water management. In: International Chemical Engineering Symposium Series

  • Savelski MJ, Bagajewicz MJ (2000) On the optimality conditions of water utilization systems in process plants with single contaminants. Chem Eng Sci 55(21):5035–5048. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00127-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skylov V, Stenzel RA (1974) Reuse of wastewaters—possibilities and problems. In: The American Institute of Chemical Engineering workshop (AIChE), Orleans

  • Smith R (2005) Chemical process design and integration. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Stijepovic MZ, Linke P (2011) Optimal waste heat recovery and reuse in industrial zones. Energy 36(7):4019–4031. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.04.048

    Google Scholar 

  • Stijepovic VZ, Linke P, Stijepovic MZ, Kijevčanin ML, Šerbanović S (2012) Targeting and design of industrial zone waste heat reuse for combined heat and power generation. Energy 47(1):302–313. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takama N, Kuriyama T, Shiroko K, Umeda T (1980) Optimal water allocation in a petroleum refinery. Comput Chem Eng 4(4):251–258. doi:10.1016/0098-1354(80)85005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taskhiri MS, Tan RT, Chiu ASF (2011) MILP model for energy optimization in EIP water networks. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13:703–712. doi:10.1007/s10098-010-0341-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YP, Smith R (1994a) Wastewater minimisation. Chem Eng Sci 49(7):981–1006. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(94)80006-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YP, Smith R (1994b) Design of distributed effluent treatment systems. Chem Eng Sci 49(18):3127–3145. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(94)E0126-B

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan FB (2010) Three fastest shortest path algorithms on real road networks. J Geogr Inf Decis Anal 1(1):69–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication was made possible by NPRP Grant No. 4-1191-2-468 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. The authors would like to thank Mason Alnouri for his great assistance and valuable input. Additionally, the authors would like to thank the rest of the research group members in College Station (Mohamed Noureldin and Kerron Gabriel) and Qatar (Sumit Bishnu, Zakarya Othman, and Dhabia Al-Mohannadi).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Linke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alnouri, S.Y., Linke, P. & El-Halwagi, M. Water integration in industrial zones: a spatial representation with direct recycle applications. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16, 1637–1659 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0739-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0739-2

Keywords

Navigation