Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Atmospheric pollutants and air quality effects: limitation costs and environmental advantages (a cost–benefit approach)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to improve the air quality in some very critical areas in Europe, it is required to limit the contaminant flux coming from different sources (thermal and industrial plants, transport systems, cars, and other technological apparatus). This limitation in many cases corresponds to important investment costs, and normally to a substantial increase in the operative costs; but, from the other side, by the intervention on the emitted pollutant loads it can be obtained a condition of better air quality, with consequent lower externality costs, chiefly with reference to the exposed population. By comparing the two aspects of increasing costs, and in particular the slope of the increasing trend, and from the other side the improvement in air quality, it is possible to identify as a compromise a convenient definition of the optimal intervention that must be realized, and it is possible to establish the performances that must be obtained, by arriving to an acceptable air quality with a sustainable cost. This strategy of identification of the optimal point between these two opposite trends has been illustrated in the present work, and some practical examples of implementation of different limitation strategies and consequent environmental results are presented; these results concern different scale solutions, and different geographic situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arena U (2012) Process and technological aspects of municipal solid waste gasification: a review. Waste Manag 32:625–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boldo E, Linares C, Lumbreras J, Borge R, Narros A, Garcia-Perez J, Fernandez-Navarro P, Perez-Gomez B, Aragones N, Ramis R, Pollan M, Moreno T, Karanasiou A, Lopez-Abente G (2011) Health impact assessment of a reduction in ambient PM2.5 levels in Spain. Environ Int 37:342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brizio E, Genon G (2006), Integrated pollution prevention and control: choosing the best available technique by using a cost benefit approach, In: Air Pollution XIV, New forest, United Kingdom

  • Canova A, Chicco G, Genon G, Mancarella P (2008) Emission characterization and evaluation of natural gas-fueled cogeneration microturbines and internal combustion engines. Energy Convers Manag 49:2900–2909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chae Y (2010) Co-benefits analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area. Environ Sci Policy 13:205–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EcoSense Model (2013), available at < http://scenarios.ew.eea.europa.eu/fol079729/online-model-inventory/ecosense>, last access on 25 February 2013

  • EEA (European Environmental Agency) (2012), Report n. 4/2012, Air quality in Europe—2012 report, availableon:<http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ardb/evt/1_avrupa_birligi/1_9_politikalar/1_9_3_cevre_politikasi/air_quality_in_europe_2012report.pdf>, last access on 26 February 2013

  • EEA (European Environmental Agency) (2010), Report n. 8/2010, Impact of selected policy measures on Europe’s air quality, available on: < http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/impact-of-selected-policy-measures>, last access on 25 February 2013

  • European Commission edited by Bickel Peter and Friedrich Rainer (2005), ExternE—Externalities of energy methodology 2005 Update, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung—IER Universität Stuttgart, Germany, ISBN: 92-79-00423-9

  • Genon G, Brizio E (2005) Modelling the effects of traffic emissions on the air quality. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Air pollution XIII. Wit Press, Southampton, pp 49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Genon G, Torchio MF, Poggio A, Poggio M (2009) Energy and environmental assessment of small district heating systems: global and local effects in two case-studies. Energy Convers Manag 50:522–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Ooka R, Kato S (2005) Urban thermal environment measurements and numerical simulation for an actual complex urban area covering a large district heating and cooling system in summer. Atmos Environ 39:6362–6375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis) (1998), Nitrogen oxides emissions, abatement technologies and related costs for Europe in the RAINS model database, available at < http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/IR-98-088.pdf>, last access on 28 February 2013

  • IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis) (2011), Cost-effective emission reductions to improve air quality in Europe in 2020, available at: < http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/documents/2011/eb/wg5/WGSR48/Informal%20docs/Info.doc.8_CIAM_report_on_Cost_effective_emission_reductions_to_improve_air_quality_in_Europe_in_2010.pdf> last access on 26 February 2013

  • IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control), Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the cement and Lime Manufacturing Industries, May 2010, available at < European Commission, IPPC, Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the cement and Lime Manufacturing Industries, Seville, 2001 > , last access on 27 February 2013

  • IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control), Reference Document on the Best Available Techniques for Waste Incineration, August 2006, available at < http://eippcb.jrc.es/reference/BREF/wi_bref_0806.pdf>, last access on 25 February 2013

  • Karvosenoja N, Johansson M (2003) Cost curve analysis for SO2 and NOx emission control in Finland. Environ Sci Policy 6:329–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lumbrearas J, Valdes M, Borge R, Rodriguez ME (2008) Assessment of vehicle emissions projections in Madrid (Spain) from 2004 to 2012 considering several control strategies. Transp Res Part A 42:646–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KM, Selin N, Reilly JM, Paltsev S (2010) Measuring welfare loss caused by air pollution in Europe: a CGE analysis. Energy Policy 38:5059–5071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panepinto D, Genon G, Senor A (2012), Evaluation of different kind of energy recovery from MSW incineration: a case study, Fourth International Symposium on Energy from Biomass and Waste, Venezia, 12–15 Novembre 2012, 1–9

  • Pay MT, Guerrero PJ, Baldasano JM (2012) Assessing sensitivity regimes of secondary inorganic aerosol formation in Europe with the CALIOPE-EU modeling system. Atmos Environ 51:146–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proost S, Van Dender K (2001) The welfare impacts of alternative policies to address atmospheric pollution in urban road transport. Regional Sci Urban Econ 31:383–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabl A, Holland M (2008) Environmental assessment framework for policy applications: life cycle assessment, external costs and multi-criteria analysis. J Environ Plan Manag 51:81–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resources for the future (2001), Restructuring and the cost of reducing NOx emissions in electricity generation, available at: http://www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-DP-01-10-REV.pdf, last access on 25 February 2013

  • Schrooten L, De Vlieger I, Lefebre F, Torfs R (2006) Costs and benefits of an enhanced reduction policy of particulate matter exhaust emissions from road traffic in Flanders. Atmos Environ 40:904–912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SD, Dolan M, Park D, Morpeth L, Ilyushechkin A, McLennan K, Harris DJ, Thambimuthu KV (2008) A critical review of syngas cleaning technologies—fundamental limitations and practical problems. Powder Technol 180:115–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Squizzato S, Masiol M, Innocente E, Pecorari E, Rampazzo G, Pavoni B (2012) A procedure to assess local and long-range transport contributions to PM2.5 and secondary inorganic aerosol. J Aerosol Sci 46:64–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tähtinen M, Lehtilä A, Pipatti R, Wistbacka M, Savolainen I (1997) Economic reduction of acidifying deposition in Finland Estonia and Russia. Sci Total Environ 204:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijay S, Decarolis JF, Srivastava RK (2010) A bottom-up method to develop pollution abatement cost curves for coal-fired utility boilers. Energy Policy 38:2255–2261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Jang C, Zhang Y, Wang K, Zhang Q, Streets D, Fu J, Lei Y, Schreifels J, He K, Hao J, Lam YF, Lin J, Meskhidze N, Voorhees S, Evarts D, Phillips S (2010) Assessment of air quality benefits from national air pollution control policies in China. Part I: Background, emission scenarios and evaluation of meteorological predictions. Atmospheric Environ 44:3442–3448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DIATI, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy

    D. Panepinto & Giuseppe Genon

  2. ARPA Piemonte, Via Vecchia di Borgo, 11, 12100, Cuneo, Italy

    Enrico Brizio

Authors
  1. D. Panepinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrico Brizio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuseppe Genon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Panepinto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panepinto, D., Brizio, E. & Genon, G. Atmospheric pollutants and air quality effects: limitation costs and environmental advantages (a cost–benefit approach). Clean Techn Environ Policy 16, 1805–1813 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0727-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0727-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation