Skip to main content
Log in

Using integrated toxic release consequences analysis tool for inherently safer design of process plant at preliminary design stage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Toxic release is one of major accidents in process plant that caused many fatalities. Some examples of major disaster due to the toxic release are the tragedy of TCDD release in Seveso, Italy (1976) and MIC release in Bhopal, India (1984). Common and popular practices to prevent such accidents are by installation of add-on protective system and to follow safe operation procedure. Even though these techniques are proven effective to minimize the probability of accidental release of toxic materials; however, the hazard is still remained in the process plant. This study reports on an alternative design approach to avoid or minimize the toxic release accidents by utilizing an inherent safety concept. A process design tool was developed by the integration of process design simulator, iCON from PETRONAS with toxic release consequence model created in MS-Excel spreadsheet. The consequence model was based on the method recommended by Center for Chemical Process Safety. This unique prototype tool allows the consequence analysis of potential toxic release to be done early in preliminary design stage. If the design fails to meet the limitation of toxic release criteria, the improvement can be done using an inherent safety concept to avoid or minimize the toxic released consequence. A case study of ammonia release from a purification column was conducted, and the results show that the toxic release consequence can be avoided or minimized during the process simulation stage. More studies are currently carried out to explore the full capabilities of the developed prototype tool for inherently safer design options before commercial applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afghan (2011) Ammonia production. http://www.nawabi.de/chemical/ammonia.asp. Accessed on 18 April 2011

  • Center for Chemical Process Safety (2000) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, 2nd edn. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (1996) Guidelines for use of vapour cloud dispersion models, 2nd edn. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (1999) International conference and workshop on modeling the consequence of accidental release of hazardous material. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley F (2005) Offshore loss prevention. The Chemical Engineer 23–25

  • Crowl DA, Louvar JF (2002) Chemical process safety: fundamentals with applications. Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs

  • Edwards DW, Lawrence D (1993) Assessing the inherent safety of chemical process routes: is there a relation between plant costs and inherent safety? Process Saf Environ Prot 71:252–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg HH, Cramer JJ (1991) Risk assessment and risk management for the chemical process industries. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot DC (2000) Process minimization: making plants safer. Chem Eng Prog 96:35–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FI, Amyotte PR (2002) Inherent safety in offshore oil and gas activities: a review of the present status and future directions. J Loss Prev Process Ind 15:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kletz TA (1991) Plant design for safety. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapierre D, Moro J (2003) Five past midnight in Bhopal. Simon & Schuster Ltd., UK

  • Leong CT, Shariff AM (2008) Inherent safety index module (ISIM) to assess inherent safety level during preliminary design stage. Process Saf Environ Prot 86(2):113–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leong CT, Shariff AM (2009) Process route index (PRI) to assess level of explosiveness for inherent safety quantification. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:216–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Shariff A, Rusli R, Chan TL, Radhakrishnan VR, Buang A (2006) Inherent safety tool for explosion consequences study. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overton T, King GM (2006) Inherently safer technology: an evolutionary approach. Process Saf Prog 25(2):116–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rusli R, Mohd Shariff A (2009) Qualitative assessment for inherently safer design (QAISD) at preliminary design stage. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff AM, Leong CT (2009) Inherent risk assessment (IRA)—a new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage. Process Saf Environ Prot 87:371–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff AM, Leong CT, Zaini D (2012) Using process stream index (PSI) to assess inherent safety level during preliminary design stage. Saf Sci 50:1098–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott RK (2000) Chemical engineering, volume 6, 3rd edn. Butterworth & Heinemann, Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick AR (1998) Inherent safety design of floating production, storage and offloading vessels (FPSOs). Proceedings of Off-shore Mechanics and Artic Engineering Conference, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwetsloot GIJM, Askounes Ashford N (1999) Encouraging inherently safer production in European firms: a report from the field. [Special Issue]. In: Amendola A, Wilkinson D (eds) Risk assessment and environmental decision making. J Hazard Mater 123–144

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovative (MOSTI), Malaysia for providing e-Science Fund 03-02-02-SF0050 that makes this project feasible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dzulkarnain Zaini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohd Shariff, A., Zaini, D. Using integrated toxic release consequences analysis tool for inherently safer design of process plant at preliminary design stage. Clean Techn Environ Policy 15, 851–858 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0572-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0572-4

Keywords

Navigation