Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Retrofit of steam power plants in a steel mill

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a systematic methodology for the analysis and design of steam power plants in a typical steel mill. Therein most of the steam is produced by applying synthesis gas, a side-product from the coke processing plants. This offers the opportunity of energy integration with vicinal companies using fuel oil or natural gas for generating steam. Components of this work include the energy reallocation and the retrofitted design of steam systems. In this study, the current strategy of energy utilization for existing sites in a steel mill is first assessed. In this regard, the energy policy is adjusted in order to enhance the performance and reduce the costs of the steam power plants. Thereafter, the retrofit is taken into account to evaluate the potential energy for the integration. The problems are formulated as a mixed integer nonlinear program based on a superstructure approach. The results of an industrial case study show that the energy integration among plants is benefit, which provides incentive to promote the cooperation of neighboring companies in an eco-industrial park.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\( b \in \mathcal{B} \) :

Boilers

\( i \in \mathcal{I} \) :

Steam headers

\( j \in \mathcal{J} \) :

Shaft power demands

\( m \in \mathcal{M} \) :

Electric motors

\( t \in \mathcal{T} \) :

Steam turbines

\( u \in \mathcal{U} \) :

Fuels

C exp,s i :

Cost per unit mass of exported i level steam (NT$/kg)

C imp,s i :

Cost per unit mass of imported i level steam (NT$/kg)

C u :

Cost per unit mass fuel u (NT$/kg)

C cw :

Specific cost of cooling water (NT$/kW)

C w :

Cost per unit mass of demineralized water make up (NT$/kg)

C exp,e :

Specific cost of exported electricity (NT$/kWh)

C imp,e :

Specific cost of imported electricity (NT$/kWh)

F pd i :

Steam process demand at header i (kg/s)

F ps i :

Steam input from process entering header i (kg/s)

H imp,s i :

Enthalpy of imported i level steam (kJ/kg)

H ps i :

Enthalpy of steam supplied by processes and delivered at header i (kJ/kg)

H sat,l i :

Enthalpy of saturated water at steam header i level (kJ/kg)

H LHV u :

Enthalpy of low heating value for fuel u (kJ/kg)

H deaer :

Enthalpy of water leaving a deaerator (kJ/kg)

H c :

Enthalpy of returning condensate from processes (kJ/kg)

H w :

Enthalpy of demineralized water makeup (kJ/kg)

t hrs :

Total operating time (h)

W dem,s j :

Shaft power demand j (kW)

W dem,e :

Total electricity demand (kW)

Z bu :

Denoting boiler b uses fuel type u

Ω:

An arbitrary large number

\( \overline{\Upomega }_{b} ,\underline{\Upomega }_{b} \) :

Upper and lower bound of steam flow rate for boiler b (kg/s)

\( \overline{\Upomega }_{D} ,\underline{\Upomega }_{D} \) :

Upper and lower bound of steam flow rate for deaerator (kg/s)

\( \overline{\Upomega }_{t} ,\underline{\Upomega }_{t} \) :

Upper and lower bound of steam flow rate for steam turbine t (kg/s)

\( \overline{\Upgamma }_{t} ,\underline{\Upgamma }_{t} \) :

Upper and lower bound of power generation for steam turbine t (kW)

φ:

Fixed blowdown fraction for boilers

η b :

Efficiency for boiler b

η m :

Fixed efficiency for electric motors

f bd bi :

Blowdown water from boiler b at pressure i (kg/s)

f bfw b :

Boiler feedwater for boiler b (kg/s)

f bi :

Steam output from boiler b to steam header i (kg/s)

f bu :

Fuel u consumed in boiler b (kg/s)

f iit :

Steam flow rate from header i to header i′ through steam turbine t (kg/s)

f ii :

Steam flow rate from header i to header i′ (kg/s)

f i :

Steam flow rate from header i to deaerator (kg/s)

f ld i :

Desuperheating boiler feedwater injected into header i (kg/s)

f exp,s i :

Steam export flow rate from header i (kg/s)

f imp,s i :

Steam import flow rate into header i (kg/s)

f vent i :

Vented steam at header i (kg/s)

f c :

Condensate return (kg/s)

f w :

Demineralized water makeup (kg/s)

h bi :

Enthalpy of steam generated by boiler b entering header i (kJ/kg)

h iit :

Enthalpy of discharge by steam turbine t entering header i′ (kJ/kg)

h i :

Enthalpy of steam header i (kJ/kg)

q b :

Heat added to the water in boiler b (kW)

q t :

Cooling water use for condensing turbine t (kW)

w iit :

Power produced by steam turbine t (kW)

w mj :

Shaft power produced by electric motor m to shaft demand j (kW)

w tj :

Shaft power produced by steam turbine t to shaft demand j (kW)

w exp,e :

Electricity exported (kW)

w imp,e :

Electricity imported (kW)

z bi :

Denotes the existence of the connection between boiler b and header i

z b :

Denotes the presence of boiler b

z iit :

Denotes the existence of the connection of steam turbine t between i and i′ headers

z m :

Denotes the presence of electric motor m

z tj :

Denotes the existence of the connection between steam turbine t and shaft demand j

z t :

Denotes the presence of steam turbine t

z exp,e :

Denotes the presence of electricity export

z imp,e :

Denotes the presence of electricity import

References

  • Aguilar O, Perry SJ, Kim JK, Smith R (2007a) Design and optimization of flexible utility systems subject to variable conditions. Part 1. Modelling framework. Chem Eng Res Des 85(A8):1136–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar O, Perry SJ, Kim JK, Smith R (2007b) Design and optimization of flexible utility systems subject to variable conditions. Part 2. Methodology and applications. Chem Eng Res Des 85(A8):1149–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay S, Varghese J, Bansal V (2010) Targeting for cogeneration potential through total site integration. Appl Therm Eng 30:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JC, Fernandez F, Castells F, Grossmann IE (1998) A rigorous MINLP model for the optimal synthesis and operation of utility plants. Chem Eng Res Des 76(A):246–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C-T, Hwang J-R (1996) A multiobjective programming approach to waste minimization in the utility systems of chemical processes. Chem Eng Sci 51(16):3951–3965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-L, Lin C-Y (2011a) A flexible structural and operational design of steam systems. Appl Therm Eng 31:2084–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-L, Lin C-Y (2011b) Design and optimization of steam distribution systems for steam power plants. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:8097–8109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-L, Lin C-Y (2012) Design of entire energy system for chemical plants. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:9980–9996

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou CC, Shih YS (1987) A thermodynamic approach to the design and synthesis of plant utility systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 26:1100–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhole VR, Linnhoff B (1993) Total site targets for fuel, co-generation, emissions, and cooling. Comput Chem Eng 17(Suppl):S101–S109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hui CW, Ahmad S (1994) Total site heat integration using the utility system. Comput Chem Eng 18(8):729–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hui CW, Natori Y (1996) An industrial application using mixed-integer programming technique: a multi-period utility system model. Comput Chem Eng 20(Suppl):S1577–S1582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer RR, Grossmann IE (1997) Optimal multiperiod operational planning for utility systems. Comput Chem Eng 21(8):787–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klemeš J, Dhole VR, Raissi K, Perry SJ, Puigjaner L (1997) Targeting and design methodology for reduction of fuel, power and CO2 on total sites. Appl Therm Eng 17:993–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez PE, Eliceche AM (2009) Minimization of life cycle CO2 emissions in steam and power plants. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11:49–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nemet A, Kravanja Z, Klemeš JJ (2012) Integration of solar thermal energy into processes with heat demand. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14:453–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishio M, Itoh J, Shiroko K, Umeda T (1980) A thermodynamic approach to steam-power system design. Ind Eng Chem Proc Des Dev 19:306–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulias SA, Grossmann IE (1983a) A structural optimization approach in process synthesis. I. Utility system. Comput Chem Eng 7(6):695–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulias SA, Grossmann IE (1983b) A structural optimization approach in process synthesis. III. Total processing systems. Comput Chem Eng 7(6):723–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal RE (2008) GAMS—a user’s guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang Z, Kokossis A (2004) A transhipment model for the optimization of steam levels of total site utility system for multiperiod operation. Comput Chem Eng 28:1673–1688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varbanov P, Perry S, Klemeš J, Smith R (2005) Synthesis of industrial utility systems: cost-effective de-carbonisation. Appl Therm Eng 25:985–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support from National Science Council of ROC (NSC100-3113-E-002-0094 and NSC 101-3113-E-002-004) is gratefully appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Liang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, CL., Lin, CY. Retrofit of steam power plants in a steel mill. Clean Techn Environ Policy 15, 753–763 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0532-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0532-z

Keywords

Navigation