Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Decision support frameworks and metrics for sustainable development of minerals and metals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Australian government-supported Co-operative Research Centre for Sustainable Resource Processing (CSRP) has undertaken a comprehensive review of sustainability metrics and decision support frameworks used by the global mining/minerals/metals sector. This paper provides a summary of that larger review. In particular, attention is given to the extent to which the plethora of current tools and approaches used by the industry are similar; the degree to which they conform with more formal approaches to decision making, as espoused by the management sciences community; and how indicators are, or should be, used to support decision making, or to set targets for achieving more sustainable outcomes from practices within the industry. We cite experience from six major companies within the sector as examples of current practice. Finally, we suggest how current best practice should be augmented by additional tools, which focus on information quality and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azapagic A (2004) Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. J Cleaner Prod 12:639–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multi criteria decision analysis. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (2002) http://www.globalreporting.org (accessed January 2006)

  • Hansen Y, Notten P, Petrie J (2002) A life cycle impact assessment indicator for ash management in coal-based power generation. S Afr Inst Mining Metallurgy 102(5):299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • ICMM (2003) ICMM sustainability principles. ICMM, London, http://www.icmm.com (accessed January, 2006)

  • Institution of Chemical Engineers (2003) http://www.icheme.org/sustainability/ (accessed January 2006)

  • ISO (2004a) ISO 14 044 Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines DRAFT 2; International Standards Organisation, Geneva

  • ISO (2004b) ISO 14 040 Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and Framework DRAFT 2; International Standards Organisation, Geneva

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mila i Canals L, Romanya J, Cowell S (2006) A methodology for assessing soil quality and quantity in life cycle assessment. J Cleaner Prod, available online 3 July

  • MMSD (2002) Seven questions to sustainability: how to assess the contribution of mining and minerals activities, International Institute for Sustainable Development, London

  • Nickel Development Institute (NiDI) http://www.nidi.org (accessed January 2006)

  • Petrie J, Stewart M, Basson L, Giurco D (2002) Decision making for sustainability—a support framework for mining and minerals processing, in green processing, proceedings of AUSIMM, Cairns, Australia

  • Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) (2002) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisted. Wiley, New York

  • Stewart TJ (1992) A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 20:569–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (1994) Company environmental reporting—a measure of the progress of business and industry towards sustainable development, Technical Report No. 24

  • Von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral researchi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development, http://www.wbcsd.org (accessed January 2006)

  • Wrisberg N, Udo de Haes HA, Triebswetter U, Eder P, Clift R (eds) (2002) Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective. Kluwer, Dordrecht

Download references

Acknowledgments

This review has been carried out with the financial support of the Centre for Sustainable Resource Processing (http://www.csrp.com.au), which is established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical and Bio-molecular Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    J. Petrie, B. Cohen & M. Stewart

Authors
  1. J. Petrie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Petrie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrie, J., Cohen, B. & Stewart, M. Decision support frameworks and metrics for sustainable development of minerals and metals. Clean Techn Environ Policy 9, 133–145 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-006-0074-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-006-0074-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation