Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-framing the assessment of sustainable stormwater systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainability indicators have become popular as a tool for the assessment of sustainable development in different sectors in society, including the urban water sector. For urban water management several sets of indicators have been suggested, using frameworks based on sectors such as drinking water, wastewater and stormwater, or domains such as social, economic and environmental issues. Still, these approaches have some major drawbacks; they have a limited system definition, they are mainly focused on technical systems performance emphasizing a distance to target-perspective, and they focus upon different kinds of impact assessments. This paper presents a different framework for the assessment of sustainable stormwater systems in order to be used in planning and in comparisons between the different available options. It is a re-framing based on systems theory focusing on general systems characteristics instead of a case-specific target to reach. The advantage of this kind of indicator framework is that it relies on the perspective that sustainability cannot be measured on one quantitative scale, that the possibilities of formal comprehensive aggregation are limited, and that a system as such cannot be judged as sustainable without consideration of its surroundings. The indicators presented here can be altered and adjusted to case-specific conditions; they are not as important as the time-and-place-independent framework guiding the assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley R, Hopkinson P (2002) Sewer systems and performance indicators—into the 21st century. Urban Water 4:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkema A, Wiejers SR, Lambert FJD (1998) On methodologies for comparison of wastewater treatment systems with respect to sustainability. Proceedings WIMAK Congress on Options for Closed Water Systems, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 11–13 March

  • Boller M (1997) Tracking heavy metals reveals sustainability deficits of urban drainage systems. Water Sci Technol 35(9):77–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bossel H (1998) Earth at a crossroads. Paths to a sustainable future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Bossel H (1999) Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications. IISD, International Institute for Sustainable Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R, Ryan R (2001) The source control paradox: professionalism, knowledge and expertise. Proceedings from NOVATECH 2001, pp 683–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Parkinson J (1997) Towards sustainable urban drainage, Water Sci Technol 35(9): 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Scholes J (1999) Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, New York

  • CSD (Commission on Sustainable Development) (1996) Indicators for sustainable development: framework and methodologies. United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/isd.htm

  • Dechesne M (2000) Infiltration of stormwater. Proceedings from 15th European Junior Scientist Workshop, Decision support for urban water management, pp 69–75

  • EEA (2000) European Signals 2000—European Environment Agency regular indicator report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

  • EEA (2001) Sustainable water use in Europe. Part 2: Demand management. Environmental issue report no 19. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis JB, Revitt DM, Harrop DO, Beckwith PR (1987) The contribution of highway surfaces to urban stormwater sediments and metal loading. Sci Total Environ 59:339–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardi P, Barg S (1997) Measuring sustainable development: Review of current practice. Occasional paper number 17. Industry Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardi P, Zdan T (1997) Assessing sustainable development—principles in practice. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg

  • Hellström D, Jeppsson U, Kärrman, E (2000) A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(3):311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjerpe M, Krantz H (2001) Handling of stormwater in open structures: a case study of critical factors for sustainability. Proceedings IWA 2001 Berlin World Water Congress, Berlin, Germany, 15–19 October

    Google Scholar 

  • Kain J-H (2000) Urban support systems. social and technical, socio-technical or sociotechnical? Department of Built Environment and Sustainable Development, Report 2000:3. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

  • Lindholm OG, Nordeide T (2000) Relevance of some criteria for sustainability in a project for disconnecting storm runoff. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(3):413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin M (1999) Assessment of the environmental sustainability of urban water systems. Department of Technical Environmental Planning, Report 1999:7. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

  • Lundin M (2003) Indicators for measuring the sustainability of urban water systems—a life cycle approach. Department of Environmental Systems Analaysis, Report 2003:1. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

  • Lundin M, Molander S, Morrison GM (1999) A set of indicators for the assessment of temporal variations in the sustainability of sanitary systems. Water Sci Technol 39(5):235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist U (2000) On sustainability indicators and sustainable product development. Department of Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

  • Maclaren V (1996) Urban sustainability reporting. J Am Planning Assoc 62(2):184–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist P-A (1984) Urban stormwater pollutant sources. Department of Sanitary Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

  • Marten GG (2001) Human ecology—basic concepts for sustainable development. Earthscan, London

  • Niemczynowicz J (1999) Urban hydrology and water management—present and future challenges. Urban Water 1:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrström AC, Jacks G (1998) Concentration and fractionation of heavy metals in roadside soils receiving de-icing salts. Sci Tot Environ 218:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt R (1985) Characterising and controlling urban runoff through street and sewerage cleaning. EPA/600/S2-85/038. US Environmental Protection Agency, Water, Engineering Research Laboratory, Cincinnati

  • Rauch W (2001) REBEKA—a software tool to plan urban drainage measures based on the predicted impacts on the receiving waters. Proceedings NOVATECH, pp 265–272

  • Ravetz J (2000) City-region 2020. Integrated planning for a sustainable environment. Earthscan, London

  • Rijsberman M A, van de Ven FHM (2000) Concepts and approaches to sustainable development in urban water management. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage, Sydney, Australia, 30 Aug–3 Sept 1999, vol 1, pp 42–49

  • Spangenberg J (2002) Institutional sustainability indicators: an analysis of the institutions in Agenda 21 and a draft set of indicators for monitoring their effectivity. Sustainable Dev 10:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNSD (2002) World Summit on Sustainable Development—2002 Country Profile format. United Nations Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/niau/csd10/cp_format_en.doc

  • UNSEC (United Nations System-wide Earthwatch Coordination) (1998) Current Status of Indicator Work, United Nations Environment Programme 1999

  • Valentin A, Spangenberg JH (2000) A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Download references

Acknowledgement

This interdisciplinary work became possible through financial support from MISTRA, The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research, which is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Söderberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sundberg, C., Svensson, G. & Söderberg, H. Re-framing the assessment of sustainable stormwater systems. Clean Techn Environ Policy 6, 120–127 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-003-0227-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-003-0227-6

Keywords

Navigation