Introduction

Lymph node tuberculosis (LN TB) is the most prevalent form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB), The World Health Organization’s(WHO ) Global Tuberculosis Report 2023 estimates 10.6 million new cases of TB worldwide in 2022 [1]。In China, the estimated number of new TB cases in 2022 is 748,000, with an incidence rate of 52 per 100,000, accounting for 7.1% of global TB cases [2,3,4].

Owing to the spread of drug-resistant tuberculosis strains, the incidence of the disease has been increasing each year, and the main clinical manifestation of cervical LN TB is cervical lymph node enlargement. The presence of drug-resistant strains can complicate the evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Thus, for patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed cervical LN TB, it is crucial to rule out the presence of drug-resistant strains. Routine pathological examination and Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli/rifampicin (MTB/RIF) assay of specimens obtained through coarse needle biopsy (CNB) can meet these clinical needs. In this study, we used contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-assisted CNB as a diagnostic tool for cervical LN TB and evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this technique. The purpose of this study was to summarize and analyze the value of HPE and Xpert (MTB/RIF) assay of CNB specimens guided by CEUS in the diagnosis of cervical LN TB.

Materials and methods

Study design

We included 612 patients suspected of cervical LN TB from October 2017 to August 2023 who were later confirmed by surgical pathology, microbial culture, and clinical diagnosis. They had a history of PPT(+), repeated low fever, tuberculosis in other places, and lymph node suppuration. Their clinical manifestations included neck mass, neck discomfort, mild tenderness and neck skin swelling, and ulcer; those patients who had not responded to previous antibiotic treatment.

All patients underwent CEUS and CEUS-assisted US-CNB for suspected cervical LN TB (Fig. 1). The criteria for US-CNB in patients were as follows: (1) suspected cervical tuberculosis; (2) lymph node with longitudinal diameter > 1 cm, transverse diameter > 0.5 cm, and aspect ratio < 2; (3) no history of antituberculosis therapy, no coagulation dysfunction, normal platelet range, and no serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases; (4) mental capacity to cooperate with the US-CNB procedure; (5) age > 18 years. Tissue samples were collected using CEUS-assisted US-CNB. All tissue samples were examined by histopathological examination (HPE) and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. In this study, positive CNB cases were those that tested positive by HPE, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, or both. For patients with abscesses in cervical lymph nodes, we collected as many abscess samples as possible using a syringe and performed Xpert MTB/RIF assay and MTB culture to assist in diagnosis. This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital (2022-YS-151). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations or declaration of Helsinki.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A is the flow chart; B is CEUS of cervical LN TB, lymph node showed heterogeneous enhancement, arrow shows enhancement area. C is US-CNB for cervical lymph node, the enhanced area was sampled, and the arrow shows the biopsy needle groove. D is the US-CNB process

We selected a comprehensive reference standard (CRS) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS-assisted US-CNB for cervical LN TB. The CRS included three components: positive MTB culture, pathological diagnosis of postoperative cervical lymph node CNB specimens (pathological diagnosis of surgically excised specimens), and effective antituberculosis therapy(Lymph node size was reduced during anti-tuberculosis treatment). According to the content of CRS, those with more than one positive item were considered to have LN TB, while those with all negative items were excluded.

US and CEUS examination

We used a Philips ultrasonic diagnostic instrument (iU22, Philips Healthcare, Bothell) equipped with a high-frequency linear array probe (L12-5, frequency 5–12 MHz; L9-3, frequency 3–9 MHz) and low-frequency convex array probe (C5-1, frequency 1–5 MHz) for imaging. Bilateral cervical lymph nodes were examined using routine ultrasound. Lymph nodes with abnormal structure and large volume on the affected side were typically chosen as targets for CNB.

CEUS examination was performed using low mechanical index (0.06) pulse reverse harmonic imaging and the sulfur hexafluoride microbubble ultrasonic contrast agent SonoVue (Milan, Italy, Bracco SpA). We injected 2.4 ml SonoVue into the elbow vein, followed by an injection of 5 ml of saline, and observed the enhancement of the lesion dynamically for 2 min. All images were stored on the instrument’s hard drive for subsequent CEUS-assisted CNB.

Diagnostic sample collection and processing

We obtained tissue samples from diseased lymph nodes (enhanced areas within lymph nodes were selected as much as possible to avoid biopsy of necrotic tissue) under the guidance of CEUS and ultrasound real-time guidance using a semiautomatic biopsy gun (18G, TSK, Japan) (Fig. 1). The biopsy length was approximately 1.0–2.0 cm, and samples were collected twice in different directions. The puncture site was anesthetized prior to biopsy, and pressure was applied to the puncture site for 10 min after biopsy to prevent bleeding (Fig. 1). Biopsy tissue specimens were typically divided into two parts, one for HPE and the other for Xpert MTB/RIF detection (Fig. 2). For necrotic lymph nodes shown by CEUS, use a syringe to collect as much pus as possible and send it for TB culture.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Test results of CNB in patients with suspected cervical LN TB. CNB positive: the positive result of HPE or Xpert MTB/RIF assay or presence of both findings; CNB negative: the negative result of HPE and Xpert MTB/RIF assay. CNB = coarse needle biopsy; CRS = composite reference standard; HPE = histopathology examination; MTB = Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli; RIF = rifampicin

HPE

Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5-µm-thick sections, which were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (HE) or Ziehl–Neelsen stain and evaluated by HPE. Positive HPE results in Presence of chronic granulomatous inflammation with caseous necrosis; acid-fast bacteria (AFB) on Ziehl–Neelsen staining, or both [5, 6]. (1) Positive.

acid-fast staining of smear or pathological section; (2) Presence of.

chronic granulomatous inflammation with caseous necrosis;

Xpert MTB/RIF assay

A tissue sample processing reagent (comes with the Xpert MTB/RIF reaction kit) was added to the tissue sample, which was then ground until a suspension was formed. The suspension was transferred to a sterile conical tube, shaken 20 times, and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The conical tube was shaken 20 more times and incubated for an additional 5 min. Finally, 2 ml of the treated sample was transferred to the Xpert MTB/RIF reaction kit (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California) using a new pipette. The reaction kit can detect TB automatically.

Perioperative prognostic evaluation of CNB specimens

Perioperative outcomes included blood loss, duration of operation, and length of hospital stay. In addition, we recorded complications within 7 days after surgery based on patient charts using the Clavien–Dindo classification method [7].

Data processing and statistical analysis

We compared the positive rate of diagnosis of cervical LN TB using HPE and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. All data were analyzed using SPSS ver. 23.0 statistical software (USA, IBM). Numerical data and differences between HPE and Xpert MTB/RIF assay were analyzed using χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients

A total of 612 patients with suspected cervical lymph node TB who underwent CEUS-assisted US-CNB were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 31.54 ± 10.21 years (range: 19–68 years), and 340 (55.6%), 201 (32.8%), and 71 (11.6%) patients were aged 20–40, 40–60, and > 60 years, respectively. According to the CRS established in this study, 532 patients were diagnosed with cervical LN TB, 34 with necrotizing lymphadenitis, 18 with metastatic cancer, 4 with nontuberculous MTB infection, and 24 with reactive hyperplasia. Cervical LN TB was most commonly characterized by multiple enlargement of unilateral cervical lymph nodes, followed by multiple enlargement of bilateral cervical lymph nodes and single enlargement of unilateral cervical lymph nodes (Table 1).

Table 1 Main clinical presentation of 612 patients with suspected of cervical LN TB

Of the 532 cases of cervical LN TB, 403 cases were Xpert MTB/RIF positive, 428 cases were HPE positive, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were shown in Table 2. Additionally, 476 patients with cervical LN TB were diagnosed with positive CNB with at least one positive result (HPE or Xpert MTB/RIF). Cervical LN TB was diagnosed based on a positive HPE or Xpert MTB/RIF assay result after CNB or both. Statistical analysis showed that compared with Xpert MTB/RIF assay, HPE had higher sensitivity, while Xpert MTB/RIF assay had higher specificity, higher PPV, and lower NPV, and the difference was statistically significant. There were 392 cases of microbial culture in pus, 159 of which were positive(40.5%).

Table 2 Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the histopathology examination and Xpert MTB/RIF assay

Results of complications in perioperative patients with suspected cervical LN TB receiving CNB are as follows: median blood loss (2 ml), duration of operation (11 min), and length of hospital stay (2 days), respectively. No postoperative complications, such as severe bleeding, were noted, and the Clavien–Dindo grading was 2 (Table 3).

Table 3 Perioperative outcomes of 102 patients with CNB

Discussion

The gold standard for diagnosing cervical LN TB is pathological diagnosis and microbial culture [8]. The sensitivity of MTB culture for TB diagnosis using surgically excised tissues as specimens has been reported to be 18–93% [9]. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis is an oligobacterial disease, and low bacterial content in specimens often results in reduced sensitivity of MTB culture. In this study, US-CNB was used to diagnose cervical LN TB. US-CNB is currently recognized as a method for obtaining definitive histopathological diagnosis under nonsurgical conditions. The conventional US-CNB procedure is relatively blind and random, particularly in the case of lymph node diseases with a wide range of liquefaction necrosis, highlighting the limitations of this technique.

Scientists have conducted in-depth studies on the application of CEUS to detect lymph nodes [10, 11]. Because cervical LN TB often presents with necrosis, peripheral tissue edema, peripheral abscess, and sinus tract formation [12], CEUS can accurately display blood perfusion in lymph nodes, necrotic areas, and peripheral blood supply. A study has confirmed that lymph node CNB after CEUS can more effectively than CNB obtain diseased lymph node tissue [13]. CEUS can clearly and accurately display the structure of cervical lymph nodes and peripheral blood vessels, allowing for more effective avoidance of vascular injury along the puncture path, thus greatly reducing the occurrence of complications. Therefore, CEUS-assisted US-CNB for cervical LN TB is more scientific.

In this study, tissue specimens were collected by CEUS-assisted US-CNB and analyzed by HPE staining and Xpert MTB/RIF assay. The diagnosis of tuberculosis by HPE is based on the detection of AFB and granulomatous inflammation [14]. Lewinsohn [15] reported a sensitivity of 69–97% in the detection of TB by HPE. Fontanilla [9] reported a sensitivity of 59–88% when HPE was used to detect LN TB. In the present study, the sensitivity of HPE was 80.4%, consistent with that reported in previous studies. In this study, we also used the Xpert MTB/RIF assay to analyze biopsy tissue samples to diagnose LN TB. This assay targets the RNA polymerase β subunit gene (rpoB) of MTB. More than 95% of rifampicin-resistant strains exhibit variation in rpoB [16]. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay has been shown to be effective in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis [17]. Kohli reported that the combined sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay based on the CRS were 42.3% (32.1–52.8%) and 99.8% (99.3–100.0%), respectively, in cerebrospinal fluid samples and 18.9% (11.5–27.9%) and 99.3% (98.1–99.8%), respectively, in pleural fluid samples [14]. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay also has a strong diagnostic value for reproductive system tuberculosis, with a sensitivity and specificity of 62.16% and 100%, respectively [18]. In our study, the sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay was slightly higher than that determined in the aforementioned study of cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusion and genital tuberculosis tissue samples. This may be attributed to differences in the CRS used in our study and the tissue specimens obtained from different organs.

The maximum incubation period for MTB culture is 8 weeks [19], while Xpert MTB/RIF assay can be completed within 2 h only, making it useful for the early diagnosis of cervical LN TB. In addition to detecting TB, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay can also determine whether the TB is resistant to rifampicin [20, 21], which is particularly important for patients with recurrent or treatment-resistant cervical LN TB to determine whether it is a drug-resistant tuberculosis infection, as this directly affects prognosis.

According to our statistical analysis, HPE showed higher sensitivity in the diagnosis of cervical LN TB than the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Therefore, HPE appears to be more effective in the diagnosis of cervical LN TB when examining tissue specimens. This may be due to the fact that the hospital where the study was conducted is a provincial diagnosis and treatment center for tuberculosis, and the pathologists have extensive experience in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. The lower sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in this study may be attributed to the small amount of MTB present in the specimens or the interference of impurities after a series of complex procedures, such as grinding. Upon submission of specimens for analysis, we included the patients’ clinical symptoms and laboratory examination results on the pathology application form, thus affecting the pathologist’s diagnosis, which could explain why HPE was more sensitive than the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. In this study, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay displayed a high level of specificity. We believe that patients with positive results from the Xpert MTB/RIF assay can serve as a basis for reassessing the clinical diagnosis of LN TB in cases where there is uncertainty about the pathological diagnosis.

We believe that CNB should not target lymph nodes with a high degree of necrosis, and it instead should aim for lymph nodes with a high proportion of enhancement CEUS should be selected as the target lymph nodes. While the diagnostic procedure of cervical LN TB via CNB may result in adverse events such as intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, pain, and peripheral lymph node abscess, our findings indicate that postoperative complications are manageable and generally fall within Clavien–Dindo grade ≦ 2. Therefore, CEUS-assisted US-CNB has strong diagnostic value in the diagnosis of cervical LN TB. This study has some limitations. Firstly, it is a retrospective, single-center study, and the findings of this study should be further validated through multi-center research. Secondly, the success rate of sampling and the incidence of postoperative complications with CEUS-assisted US-CNB are dependent on the experience of the operating physician. Finally, our hospital is a regional referral center, and due to the guidance of medical policy, many patients suspected of having LN TB are referred to our hospital. Our research results have significant implications for further treatment.

Conclusion

US-CNB assisted by CEUS is a sampling tool for the diagnosis of cervical LN TB, which has strong diagnostic effect and minor complications. HPE and Xpert MTB/RIF assay are recommended for tissue samples after biopsy, because HPE has a high diagnostic efficacy, and patients who test positive for Xpert MTB/RIF can not only promote early diagnosis, but also help to revise the clinical diagnosis of patients with unclear HPE.