Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performances of ICT Toxoplasma IgG-IgM test in comparison with Vidas® toxo competition to determine the immune status against Toxoplasma gondii

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a ubiquitous parasitic infection caused by Toxoplasma gondii (Tg). In immunocompetent people, the infection may be asymptomatic with the induction of an immune response that may prevent reinfection or transmission to the fetus in immune pregnant woman. In immunocompromised persons or seronegative pregnant woman with a primary infection during pregnancy, the infection may result in the loss of life, sight, cognition, and motor function in the immune-compromised person or immunologically immature fetus. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new immunochromatographic test Toxoplasma ICT IgG-IgM (ICT) that allows detection of specific anti-Tg immunoglobulins G (Ig G) and M (Ig M). We included 1145 prospectively obtained sera and 376 samples selected for specificity or sensitivity studies. The performance of ICT was compared using Vidas® Toxo Competition (TXC) and Toxoscreen®. In case of discrepancy, Vidas® Toxo Ig G or Ig M and LDBIO Toxo II IgG western blot were used to establish definitive results by additional methods. Sensitivity and specificity of ICT were respectively 99.3% and 100%. In comparison, Toxoscreen®’s sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 99.8%. TXC had a sensitivity of 98.7% with a specificity of 99.1%. ICT has excellent performance even for low Ig G titers, especially in immunocompromised patients, and confirms the specificity of isolated Ig M. This ICT provides reliable results easily and quickly. This screening technique is not designed to differentiate the Ig M from Ig G. When positive, additional tests may be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available due to associated clinical data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O (2004) Toxoplasmosis. The Lancet 363(9425):1965–1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallon M, Peyron F (2018) Congenital toxoplasmosis: a plea for a neglected disease. Pathogens 7(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens7010025

  3. Remington JS, Thulliez P, Montoya JG (2004) Recent developments for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol 42(3):941–945. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.3.941-945.2004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Villard O, Cimon B, L’Ollivier C et al (2016) Serological diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection: recommendations from the French National Reference Center for Toxoplasmosis. Elsevier Enhanc Read. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Toxoplasma ICT IgG-IgM - instruction for use - LDBio - February 2019. https://ldbiodiagnostics.com/wp-content/uploads/simple-file-list/NOTICES/2_RAPID-TESTS/FRANCAIS/TOXOPLASMA-ICT-IgG-IgM-vs12-fr-en.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2023

  6. Valtaud E, Lacroix C, Rodier MH et al (1991) Critical study of ELISA technique and high sensitivity direct agglutination test for the screening of antitoxoplasma IgG. Ann Biol Clin 49(7):397–400

  7. VIDAS toxo compétition - instruction for use - biomérieux - April 2006. http://www.biologiemarine.com/___fiches/APIpdf/VIDAS%C2%AETOXO%20Comp%C3%A9tition-_06361_-_N_-_30211.pdf. Accessed 7 Aug 2021

  8. Toxo Ig G - Architect system - Abbot diagnostics - instruction for use - January 2009. https://www.ilexmedical.com/files/PDF/ToxoIgG_ARC.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2021

  9. Villard O, Cimon B, L’Ollivier C et al (2016) Help in the choice of automated or semiautomated immunoassays for serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis: evaluation of nine immunoassays by the French National Reference Center for Toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol 54(12):3034–3042. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01193-16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fricker-Hidalgo H, Bailly S, Brenier-Pinchart MP et al (2020) How to estimate time of infection with Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women. Use of specific IgG and IgM kinetics by 7 techniques on 691 sera. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 96(4):114987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.114987

  11. Robert-Gangneux F, Guegan H (2021) Anti-Toxoplasma IgG assays: what performances for what purpose? Syst Rev Parasite 28:39. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapey E, Wallon M, Peyron F (2017) Evaluation of the LDBIO point of care test for the combined detection of toxoplasmic IgG and IgM. Clin Chim Acta 464:200–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.10.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahinc C, Flori P, Delaunay E et al (2017) Evaluation of a new immunochromatography technology test (LDBio Diagnostics) to detect Toxoplasma IgG and IgM: comparison with the routine architect technique. J Clin Microbiol 55(12):3395–3404. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01106-17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sukthana Y, Chintana T, Supatanapong W, Siripan C, Lekkla A, Cheabchalrad R (2001) Predictive value of latex agglutination test in serological screening for Toxoplasma gondii. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 32(2):314–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Begeman IJ, Lykins J, Zhou Y et al (2017) Point-of-care testing for Toxoplasma gondii IgG/IgM using Toxoplasma ICT IgG-IgM test with sera from the United States and implications for developing countries. Plos Negl Trop Dis 11(6):e0005670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Abdallah R, Kalboussi Y, Bellali H et al (2021) Contribution of the Toxoplasma ICT IgG IgM® test in determining the immune status of pregnant women against toxoplasmosis. J Clin Lab Anal 35(5):e23749. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Khammari I, Saghrouni F, Yaacoub A et al (2013) IgG Western Blot for confirmatory diagnosis of equivocal cases of toxoplasmosis by EIA-IgG and fluorescent antibody test. Korean J Parasitol 51(4):485–488. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2013.51.4.485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Franck J, Garin YJF, Dumon H (2008) LDBio-toxo II immunoglobulin G western blot confirmatory test for anti-Toxoplasma antibody detection. J Clin Microbiol 46(7):2334–2338. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00182-08

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts A, Hedman K, Luyasu V et al (2001) Multicenter evaluation of strategies for serodiagnosis of primary infection with Toxoplasma gondii. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 20(7):467–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00011289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mandelbrot L, Kieffer F, Wallon M et al (2021) Toxoplasmose pendant la grossesse : proposition actuelle de prise en charge pratique. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité &Sénologie 49(10):782–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.03.003

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Taking out Toxo, the Network for Good, the Toxoplasmosis Research Institute, the Cornwell Mann Family Foundation, and the Morel and Rodriguez families for their support of the Toxoplasmosis Research Laboratory work in Chicago during the time these studies were planned, developed and carried out.

Funding

We thank The Thrasher Children’s Charity Research Fund for their E.W. “Al” Thrasher Award, the Susan and Richard Kiphart Family Foundation Global–Local Health Seed Fund Award (to RMc), the LDBio Diagnostics that supplied the ICT, Toxoscreen®, and TXC reagents and paid for an additional technician to perform the tests within the Bichat Hospital laboratory. They did not interfere with the performing of the tests, the recording and interpretation of the results nor the reported conclusions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sylvie Abraham, Rima McLeod, and Sandrine Houzé conceived and designed the study. Sylvie Abraham performed the laboratory experiments. Sandrine Houzé brought technical support and result validation. Statistical analysis was performed by Sylvie Abraham and Raphael Piarroux. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Sylvie Abraham and all authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandrine Houzé.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The USA sending was exempted by University of Chicago investigational research board as it was impossible to link samples to patients and residual samples that are otherwise discarded were utilized. For French samples, only the staffs from the hospital had access to the laboratory results. Interpretation was performed anonymously. According to the French law, patients were informed that their samples might be used for research and they retained the right to oppose the use of their anonymized medical data for research purpose. Dedicated ethical approval and individual patient consent were not necessary for this type of research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

In Paris and Lyon, the authors in Paris and Lyon have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose except R Piarroux who was employed by the LDBio Company. In Chicago, at LDBio Diagnostics, Raphael Piarroux PharmD, PhD (RP) was the R&D Director Scientist until January 13, 2023, and during that time these studies were planned and discussed with RMc Leod (RMc). A patent application was submitted by D. Limonne, PharmD with the scientists at the University of Chicago and in Lyon, France in August 2018. This application is pending review in the United States Patent Office in accordance with the US Bayh Dole laws. This is for the development of the whole blood point of care test and the practical clinical utility of the ICT to guide treatment for gestational infection to prevent congenital toxoplasmosis. This is to insure its continued high-quality performance and reproducibility of the results described herein. In this collaborative work, the scientist RP and DL at LDBio provided insights and knowledge from their earlier work in creating the ICT. The scientists at LDBio did not interfere with the obtaining of samples, performing of the tests, the recording and interpretation of the results, nor the reported conclusions of any work at any academic site. All this work was performed independently in the academic centers. There was no payment to those at the University of Chicago.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abraham, S., Piarroux, R., Zhou, Y. et al. Performances of ICT Toxoplasma IgG-IgM test in comparison with Vidas® toxo competition to determine the immune status against Toxoplasma gondii. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 42, 1327–1335 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04669-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04669-8

Keywords

Navigation