Skip to main content
Log in

Development and evaluation of automated synovial fluid total cell count on an Iris iQ® 200 for identifying patients at risk of septic arthritis

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Septic arthritis is a diagnostic emergency. The white blood cell (WBC) count, in synovial fluid (SF), can guide the diagnosis. From November 2021 to November 2022, we included 350 SF. The WBC count was performed with the Iris iQ® 200 compared with the manual method. Automated and manual counts displayed good correlation. However, a Bland Altman plot demonstrates a higher percentage difference at higher WBC counts. The use of Iris iQ® 200 for SF analysis enables a rapid and accurate assessment for WBC count. Its implementation would advantageously replace the long and tedious optical analysis in daily routine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Abram SGF, Alvand A, Judge A, Beard DJ, Price AJ (2020) Mortality and adverse joint outcomes following septic arthritis of the native knee: a longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving arthroscopic washout. Lancet Infect Dis Mars 20(3):341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravn C, Neyt J, Benito N, Abreu MA, Achermann Y, Bozhkova S et al (2023) Guideline for management of septic arthritis in native joints (SANJO). J Bone Jt Infect 8(1):29–37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuuminen T, Lounamo K, Leirisalo-Repo M (2013) A review of serological tests to assist diagnosis of reactive arthritis: critical appraisal on methodologies. Front Immunol 4:418

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tiwari V, Bergman MJ (2023) Viral arthritis. StatPearls Publishing, StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Couderc M, Pereira B, Mathieu S, Schmidt J, Lesens O, Bonnet R et al (2015) Predictive value of the usual clinical signs and laboratory tests in the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Can J Emerg Med 17(4):403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Couderc M, Bart G, Coiffier G, Godot S, Seror R, Ziza JM et al (2020) 2020 French recommendations on the management of septic arthritis in an adult native joint. Joint Bone Spine 87(6):538–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carpenter CR, Schuur JD, Everett WW, Pines JM (2011) Evidence-based diagnostics: adult septic arthritis. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 18(8):781–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Jonge R, Brouwer R, de Graaf MT, Luitwieler RL, Fleming C, de Frankrijker-Merkestijn M et al (2010) Evaluation of the new body fluid mode on the Sysmex XE-5000 for counting leukocytes and erythrocytes in cerebrospinal fluid and other body fluids. Clin Chem Lab Med 48(5):665–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dossou N, Gaubert I, Moriceau C, Cornet E, le Hello S, Malandain D (2022) Evaluation of flow cytometry for cell count and detection of bacteria in biological fluids. Microbiol Spectr 10(1):e0183021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Froom P, Diab A, Barak M (2013) Automated evaluation of synovial and ascitic fluids with the Advia 2120 hematology analyzer. Am J Clin Pathol 140(6):828–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buoro S, Seghezzi M, Manenti B, Mecca T, Candiago E, Vidali M et al (2017) Reliability of automated synovial fluid cell counting with Mindray BC-6800 body fluid mode. Int J Lab Hematol. 39(3):337–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugiuchi H, Ando Y, Manabe M, Nakamura E, Mizuta H, Nagata S et al (2005) Measurement of total and differential white blood cell counts in synovial fluid by means of an automated hematology analyzer. J Lab Clin Med 146(1):36–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aune MW, Becker JL, Brugnara C, Canfield W, Dorfman DM, Fiehn W et al (2004) Automated flow cytometric analysis of blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid: analytic performance. Am J Clin Pathol 121(5):690–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andrews J, Setran E, McDonnel L, Kussick S, Wood BL, Sabath DE (2005) An evaluation of the cell-dyn 3200 for counting cells in cerebrospinal and other body fluids. Lab Hematol Off Publ Int Soc Lab Hematol 11(2):98–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aulesa C, Mainar I, Prieto M, Cobos N, Galimany R (2003) Use of the Advia 120 hematology analyzer in the differential cytologic analysis of biological fluids (cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, synovial, and others). Lab Hematol Off Publ Int Soc Lab Hematol 9(4):214–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnes PW, Eby CS, Shimer G (2004) An evaluation of the utility of performing body fluid counts on the coulter LH 750. Lab Hematol Off Publ Int Soc Lab Hematol 10(3):127–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown W, Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, Johnson K, Lantis K, Finn W et al (2003) Validation of body fluid analysis on the Coulter LH 750. Lab Hematol Off Publ Int Soc Lab Hematol 9(3):155–159

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schumacher HR, Sieck MS, Rothfuss S, Clayburne GM, Baumgarten DF, Mochan BS et al (1986) Reproducibility of synovial fluid analyses. A study among four laboratories. Arthritis Rheum. juin 29(6):770–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hasselbacher P (1987) Variation in synovial fluid analysis by hospital laboratories. Arthritis Rheum 30(6):637–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de Jonge R, Brouwer R, Smit M, de Frankrijker-Merkestijn M, Dolhain RJEM, Hazes JMW et al (2004) Automated counting of white blood cells in synovial fluid. Rheumatol Oxf Engl 43(2):170–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Paris A, Nhan T, Cornet E, Perol JP, Malet M, Troussard X (2010) Performance evaluation of the body fluid mode on the platform Sysmex XE-5000 series automated hematology analyzer. Int J Lab Hematol 32(5):539–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the lab technicians for the SF collection and the medical residents for their contribution in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Corvec.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

According to the French and European legislation, in this monocentric prospective study, the use of anonymized human samples from care and data by the practitioners does not need the approval of an ethics committee when the aim is to improve the practices of biology analysis. This study was recorded at Nantes University hospital by the local Data Privacy Officer under the reference TS005-BIO-AP-2019.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruffier d’Epenoux, L., Fayoux, E., Bémer, P. et al. Development and evaluation of automated synovial fluid total cell count on an Iris iQ® 200 for identifying patients at risk of septic arthritis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 42, 1031–1036 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04628-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04628-3

Keywords

Navigation