Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Therapeutic failures of targeted antibiotic prophylaxis in urology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Targeted antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) is required for patients with positive urine culture before urological surgery. Our aim was to determine the efficacy of TAP. This was a prospective single-center study performed in a urology department. All patients who underwent a programmed surgery were included. Urine culture was obtained before surgery requiring a prophylaxis: in the case of sterile urines, antibiotics were used in accordance with national recommendations; for positive urine culture, a TAP was used in accordance with susceptibility testing. The drugs were administered for 2 days before surgery until withdrawal of bladder catheter. The occurrence of healthcare-associated infections was registered until day 30 after surgery. Two hundred three patients were included for 8 non-consecutive weeks in 2020, among whom fifteen were lost of sight before day 30. Among the remaining 188 patients, most frequent surgeries were 75 prostatic diseases (40%), 50 endo-ureteral surgeries for JJ stent insertion (27%), and 23 bladder cancers (12%). One hundred forty-eight (79%) patients required a urine culture before procedure; 142/148 (96%) urine cultures were performed, leading to 74 TAP. The main isolated bacteria were 48 Enterobacteriaceae and 8 Enterococcus spp. TAP was cotrimoxazole (n = 30), aminoglycosides (n = 11), amoxicillin (n = 9), fluoroquinolones (n = 7), and others (n = 17). The rate of healthcare-associated infections was 14.8% (11/74), including six microbiologically documented antibiotic failures. The rate of healthcare-associated infection after urological surgery using TAP was high, implying to discuss the choice and the dosage of the antibiotic molecules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Wolf JS, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ (2008) Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 179:1379–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khaw C, Oberle AD, Lund BC et al (2018) Assessment of guideline discordance with antimicrobial prophylaxis best practices for common urologic procedures. JAMA Netw Open 1(8):e186248. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Medina-Polo J, Sopeña-Sutil R, Benítez-Sala R et al (2017) Prospective study analyzing risk factors and characteristics of healthcare-associated infections in a urology ward. Investig Clin Urol 58:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Enquête nationale de prévalence des infections nosocomiales et des traitements anti-infectieux en établissements de santé, mai-juin 2017. https://www.enquete-nationale-de-prevalence-des-infections-nosocomiales-et-des-traitements-anti-infectieux-en-etablissements-de-sante-mai-juin-2017

  5. Souhail B, Charlot P, Déroudilhes G, Coblentz Y, Pierquet G, Gimel P et al (2020) Urinary tract infection and antibiotic use around ureteral stent insertion for urolithiasis. Eur J Clin Microbial Infect Dis 39:2077–2083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Köves B, Cai T, Veeratterapillay R, Pickard R, Seisen T, Lam TB et al. Benefits and harms of treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the European Association of Urology. Eur Ass Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.014

  7. Sabé N, Oriol I, Melilli E, Manonelles A, Bestard O, Polo C et al (2019) Antibiotic treatment versus no treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter randomized trial. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:ofz243. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicolle LE, Gupta K, Bradley SF, Colgan R, DeMuri GP, Drekonja D et al (2019) Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 68:1611–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kandil H, Cramp E, Vaghela T (2016) Trends in antibiotic resistance in urologic practice. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.09.0068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor AK, Zembower TR, Nadler RB et al (2012) Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications and cost of care. J Urol 187:1275–1279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Boeri L, Fontana M, Gallioli A, Zanetti SP, Catellani M, Longo F et al (2017) Rectal culture-guided targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the incidence of post-operative infectious complications in men at high risk for infections submitted to transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy – results of a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 12:e0170319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Concepcion RS, Schaeffer EM, Shore ND, Kapoor DA, Scott JA, Kirsh GM (2019) The effect of local antibiogram–based augmented antibiotic prophylaxis on infection-related complications following prostate biopsy. Rev Urol 21:93–101

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Peron EP, Hirsch AA, Jury LA, Jump RL, Donskey CJ (2013) Another setting for stewardship: high rate of unnecessary antimicrobial use in a Veterans Affairs long term care facility. J Am Geriat Soc 61:289–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamasuna R, Betsunoh H, Sueyoshi T, Yakushiji K, Tsukino H, Nagano M et al (2004) Bacteria of preoperative urinary tract infections contaminate the surgical fields and develop surgical site infections in urological operations. Inter J Urol 11:941–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen M, Buurma V, Shah M, Fahim G (2019) Evaluation of studies on extended versus standard infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics. Am J Health Syst Pharm 76:1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lacy MK, Nicolau DP, Nightingale CH, Quintiliani R (1998) The pharmacodynamics of aminoglycosides. Clin Infect Dis 27:23–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the study, and all have read and consent to the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Marie Roger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The antibiotic audit was sponsored by the French National Health Agency.

Consent to participate

The patients or their relatives provided written consent for computerization of their personal data for hospitalization purposes and clinical research. Patient privacy was protected as no personal data were extracted or copied from the computerized chart.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Curlier, E., Sadreux, Y., Markowicz, S. et al. Therapeutic failures of targeted antibiotic prophylaxis in urology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 41, 299–304 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04329-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04329-9

Keywords

Navigation