Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simplified therapeutic guidelines: the main tool of antimicrobial stewardship programs associated with optimal antibiotic therapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 29 January 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Hospitals regularly seek to upgrade their antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of simplified therapeutic guidelines (STGs) compared to various established tools for ASP on the rate of optimal antibiotic therapy (OAT) and antibiotic consumption. Audits of antibiotic prescriptions were carried out over a 24-month period. Feedback information led to STGs (e.g., ≤ 15 drugs). The impact of STGs was based on the rate of OAT, defined as a diagnosis of the infectious disease in the patient’s medical records associated with the corresponding therapy indicated in the STGs or in other guidelines. STGs were compared to five other means of ASP: internal or national guidelines, audit, information regarding antibiotic consumption and bacterial resistance, and restricted access to targeted antibiotics. Antibiotic consumption was measured in defined daily doses/1000 days of hospital stay, focusing on third-generation cephalosporins (TGC) and fluoroquinolones (FQ). Twenty-six hospitals were audited from April 2017 to June 2019. A total of 1,028 antibiotic prescriptions were analyzed, including 204 (20%) after STG implementation in seven hospitals. In multivariate analysis, OAT (n = 176, 17%) was associated with STGs, AOR 2.21 [1.51–3.22], and with three tools in place, 1.75 [1.24–2.48]. The relative variations of consumption of TGC and FQ for hospitals with or without STGs were − 13.1 vs. + 9.4% and − 18.5 vs. − 2.7%, respectively, from 2018 to 2019. STGs were more likely than other ASP tools to improve the rate of OAT and to reduce the consumption of antibiotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

StatView software version 5.0.

Change history

References

  1. Pollack LA, Srinivasan A (2014) Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clin Infect Dis 59(S3):97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, MacDougall C, Schuetz AN, Septimus EJ et al (2016) Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:e51-77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schuts EC, Hulscher MEJL, Mouton JW, Verduin CM, Cohen Stuart JWT, Overdiek HWPM et al (2016) Current evidence on hospital antimicrobial stewardship objectives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 16(7):847–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Étienne P, Roger PM, Brofferio P, Labate C, Blanc V, Tiger F et al (2011) Antimicrobial stewardship program and quality of antibiotic prescriptions. Med Mal Inf 41(11):608–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roger PM, Montéra E, Lesselingue D, Troadec N, Charlot P, Simand A et al (2019) Risk factors for unnecessary antibiotic therapy: a major role for clinical management. Clin Infect Dis 69(3):466–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Coz P, Carlet J, Roblot F, Pulcini C (2016) Human resources needed to perform antimicrobial stewardship teams’ activities in French hospitals. Med Mal Infect 46(4):200–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ten Oever J, Harmsen M, Schouten J, Ouwens M, Van der Linden PD, Verduin CM et al (2018) Human resources required for antimicrobial stewardship teams: a Dutch consensus report. Clin Microbiol Infect 24(12):1273–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roger PM, Demonchy E, Risso K, Courjon J, Leroux S, Leroux E et al (2017) Medical table: a major tool for antimicrobial stewardship policy. Med Mal Infect 47(5):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamma PD, Avdic E, Keenan JF, Zhao Y, Anand G, Cooper J et al (2017) What is the more effective antibiotic stewardship intervention: preprescription authorization or postprescription review with feedback? Clin Infect Dis 64(5):537–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roger PM, Peyraud I, Vitris M, Romain V, Bestman L, Blondel L et al (2020) Impact of simplified therapeutic guidelines on antibiotic prescriptions: a prospective multicentre comparative study. J Antimicrob Chemother 75(3):747–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roger PM, Michelangeli C, Girard D et al (2019) Streamlined guidelines for antibiotic therapies are required for greater efficacy. Med Mal Infect 49:363–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mendelson M, Morris AM, Thursky K, Pulcini C (2020) How to start an antimicrobial stewardship programme in a hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect 26(4):447–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boussat S, Demoré B, Lozniewski A, Aissa N, Rabaud C (2012) How to improve the collection and analysis of hospital antibiotic consumption: preliminary results of the ConsoRes software experimental implementation. Med Mal Infect 42(4):154–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spivak ES, Cosgrove SE, Srinivasan A (2016) Measuring appropriate antimicrobial use: attempts at opening the black box. Clin Infect Dis 63(15):1639–1641

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Binda F, Tebano G, Kallen MC, Tebano G, Pulcini C, Murri R et al (2020) Nationwide survey of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs in France. Med Mal Infect 50(5):414–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kallen MC, Ten Oever J, Prins JM, Kullberg BJ, Schouten JA, Hulscher ME (2018) A survey on antimicrobial stewardship prerequisites, objectives and improvement strategies: systematic development and nationwide assessment in Dutch acute care hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 73(12):3496–3504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Braykov N, Morgan DJ, Schweizer ML, Uslan DZ, Kelesidis T, Weisenberg SA et al (2014) Assessment of empirical therapy in six hospitals: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 14(12):1220–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR (2001) Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 29(7):1303–1310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsertsvadze A, Royle P, Seedat F, Cooper J, Crosby R, McCarthy N (2016) Community-onset sepsis and its public health burden: a systematic review. Syst Rev 5:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0243-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lopansri BK, Miller Iii RR, Burke JP, Levy M, Opal S, Rothman RE et al (2019) Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort. J Intens Care 7:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-019-0368-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roger PM, Martin C, Taurel M, Fournier JP, Nicole I, Carles M et al (2002) Motives for the prescription of antibiotics in the emergency department of the university hospital center in Nice. A prospective study. Press Med 31(2):58–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Coon ER, Maloney CG, Shen MW (2015) Antibiotic and diagnostic discordance between ED physicians and hospitalists for pediatric respiratory illness. Hosp Peds 5(3):111–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aillet C, Jammes D, Fribourg A, Léotard S, Pellat O, Etienne P et al (2018) Bacteraemia in emergency departments: effective antibiotic reassessment is associated with a better outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37(2):325–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Casaroto E, Marra AR, Camargo TZS, de Souza ARA, de Almeida CES et al (2015) Agreement on the prescription of antimicrobial drugs. BMC Infect Dis 30(15):248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0992-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was carried out as part of our routine work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P-M. R, V. D., and A. R. contributed to the study design. P-M. R. and F. M. contributed to the statistical analysis; E. M., P-M. R., A. R., and V. D. contributed to the writing of the article; P-M. R., D. R., O. P., and M-J. M. contributed to the study design and patient inclusion.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Marie Roger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The antibiotic audit was sponsored by the French National Health Agency.

Consent to participate

The patients or their relatives provided written consent for computerization of their personal data for hospitalization purposes and clinical research. In accordance with national directives, patient privacy was protected as no personal data were extracted or copied from the computerized chart.

Consent for publication

All authors have read the paper and consent to its publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: “V3” was incorrectly added at the end of the main title of the originally published article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roger, PM., Espinet, A., Ravily, D. et al. Simplified therapeutic guidelines: the main tool of antimicrobial stewardship programs associated with optimal antibiotic therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 41, 375–383 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04317-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04317-z

Keywords

Navigation