Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bacterial agents in vulvovaginitis and vaginal discharge: a 10-year retrospective study in the Netherlands

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vulvovaginitis is a common problem in the GP’s practice. Causes are bacterial vaginosis (BV), Candida infection and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Only if empirical treatment fails, a vaginal swab is sent in for culture and BV detection. However, without culture essential, bacterial pathogens may escape diagnosis. Many molecular BV assays have recently appeared on the marketplace, all quite differing in price and targets. However, for years, the Nugent score has been the gold standard for BV detection. We analysed retrospectively 10 years of microbiology results of vulvovaginal swabs, focusing on less frequently reported bacterial pathogens, and assessed the characteristics of BV diagnostics. Vulvovaginal swabs sent in between 2010 and 2020 from > 11,000 GP patients with vulvovaginitis associated symptoms, but negative STI tests, were analysed. First cultures and repeat cultures after at least 6 months were included in four age groups: < 12, 12–17, 18–51 and > 51 years. Candida species and BV were most frequently found, with the highest prevalence in premenopausal women. Haemophilus influenzae, beta-haemolytic streptococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus were isolated in 5.6% of all cultures, with the highest percentages in children and postmenopausal women. If empirical treatment of vulvovaginitis fails, bacterial culture should be performed to detect all potentially pathogenic microorganisms to obtain a higher rate of successful diagnosis and treatment, avoiding unnecessary antimicrobial use and costs. For BV detection, molecular testing may seem attractive, but Nugent scoring still remains the low-cost gold standard. We recommend incorporating the above in the appropriate guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) (2020) Jaarcijfers aandoeningen: incidenties en prevalenties 2020. http://www.nivel.nl/nl/nivel-zorgregistraties-eerste-lijn/jaarcijfers-aandoeningen-huisartsenregistraties. Accessed 11 March 2021

  2. Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) (2016) The practice guideline “Vaginal discharge” (third revision). https://richtlijnen.nhg.org/standaarden/fluor-vaginalis. Accessed 11 March 2021

  3. Sherrard J, Wilson J, Donders G, Mendling W, Jensen JS (2018) 2018 European (IUSTI/WHO) International Union against sexually transmitted infections (IUSTI) World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline on the management of vaginal discharge. Int J STD AIDS 29:1258–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goje O, Munoz JL (2017) Vulvovaginitis: find the cause to treat it. Cleve Clin J Med 84:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KCS, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK (1983) Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 74:14–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saxon Lead Author GDGC, Edwards A, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Owen C, Nathan B, Palmer B, Wood C, Ahmed H, Ahmad Patient Representatives S, FitzGerald Ceg Editor M (2020) British Association for Sexual Health and HIV national guideline for the management of vulvovaginal candidiasis (2019). Int J STD AIDS 31:1124–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox RA, Slack MP (2002) Clinical and microbiological features of Haemophilus influenzae vulvovaginitis in young girls. J Clin Pathol 55:961–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruins MJ, Damoiseaux RA, Ruijs GJ (2009) Association between group A beta-haemolytic streptococci and vulvovaginitis in adult women: a case-control study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:1019–1021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL (1991) Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 29:297–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman JS, Gaydos CA (2018) Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an update. J Clin Microbiol 56:e00342–e00318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maris S, van der Vlugt I, Deurloo J, Lanting C (2014) JGZ-richtlijn Seksuele ontwikkeling. Nederlands Centrum Jeugdgezondheid, Utrecht 2014. https://assets.ncj.nl/docs/0c9a562b-b788-4b75-b6a1-f4dca59b592d.pdf. Accessed June 2020. Accessed 11 March 2021

  12. Bouma J, De Jonge M, De Laat EAT, Eekhof H, Engel HF, Groeneveld FPMJ, Stevens NTJM, Verduijn MM, Goudswaard AM (2012) NHG-Standaard De overgang (eerste herziening). Huisarts Wet 55:168–172

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tibaldi C, Cappello N, Latino MA, Masuelli G, Marini S, Benedetto C (2009) Vaginal and endocervical microorganisms in symptomatic and asymptomatic non-pregnant females: risk factors and rates of occurrence. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:670–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cauci S, Driussi S, De Santo D, Penacchioni P, Iannicelli T, Lanzafame P, de Seta F, Quadrifoglio F, de Aloysio D, Guaschino S (2002) Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal flora changes in peri- and postmenopausal women. J Clin Microbiol 40:2147–2152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muhleisen AL, Herbst-Kralovetz MM (2016) Menopause and the vaginal microbiome. Maturitas 91:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ranđelović G, Mladenović V, Ristić L, Otašević S, Branković S, Mladenović-Antić S, Bogdanović M, Bogdanović D (2012) Microbiological aspects of vulvovaginitis in prepubertal girls. Eur J Pediatr 171:1203–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Merkley K (2005) Vulvovaginitis and vaginal discharge in the pediatric patient. J Emerg Nurs 31:400–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen MT, Sanchez VT, Eyster K, Hansen KA (2007) Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngeal colonization resulting in recurrent, prepubertal vulvovaginitis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 20:315–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zwart S, Ruijs GJ, Sachs AP, van Leeuwen WJ, Gubbels JW, de Melker RA (2000) Beta-haemolytic streptococci isolated from acute sore-throat patients: cause or coincidence? A case-control study in general practice. Scand J Infect Dis 32:377–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Donders GG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B (2002) Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: aerobic vaginitis. BJOG 109:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaambo E, Africa C, Chambuso R, Passmore JS (2018) Vaginal microbiomes associated with aerobic vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis. Front Public Health 6:78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keppel L, Van’t Veen A (2018) Groep A-streptokokken vulvovaginitis vaak onderbelicht. Huisarts Wet 61(7)

  23. Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Vaneechoutte M, Temmerman M (2011) Group A streptococcal vaginitis: an unrecognized cause of vaginal symptoms in adult women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284:95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ugurlu G, van der Houwen C, Brandenburg A, Schreuder I, Bogchelman D (2008) Streptococcus pyogenes vaginitis in a postmenopausal woman. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138:115–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rahangdale L, Lacy J, Hillard PA (2008) Group A Streptococcus vulvovaginitis in breastfeeding women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:e4–e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN (2016) The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 29:223–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Redelinghuys MJ, Geldenhuys J, Jung H, Kock MM (2020) Bacterial vaginosis: current diagnostic avenues and future opportunities. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data and drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors approved of the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjan J. Bruins.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and informed consent

All procedures performed in our study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruins, M.J., dos Santos, C.O., Damoiseaux, R.A.M.J. et al. Bacterial agents in vulvovaginitis and vaginal discharge: a 10-year retrospective study in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 40, 2123–2128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04265-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04265-8

Keywords

Navigation