Skip to main content
Log in

Levels of evidence supporting clinical practice guidelines on invasive aspergillosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a severe life-threatening infection with challenges in therapy. The aim was to evaluate the level of evidence (LOE) supporting recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of IA and changes over time. Search on CPG on IA released between 2000 and 2019 was done. Last versions were evaluated and compared with previous versions. Recommendations were classified by LOE as A (multiple randomized controlled trial (RCT) or meta-analysis), B (data from a single RCT or observational studies), or C (observational studies with limitations, case series, or expert opinion). Diagnosis recommendations were excluded. Five CPG from three groups of scientific societies were identified: the 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS), 2017 European Society of Clinical Microbiology Infectious Diseases/European Confederation of Medical Mycology/European Respiratory Society (ESCMID/ECMM/ERS), 2018 Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) CPGs, and their previous versions (2008 IDSA/ATS and 2011 GEMICOMED/SEIMC). ECMID/ECMM/ERS have not published any previous version. From 511 recommendations analyzed, 80 were classified as LOE A (15.7%), 223 LOE B (43.6%), and 208 LOE C (40.7%). Among 238 strong recommendations, only 57 (24.0%) were supported by LOE A. When comparing recent CPGs with previous versions, the proportion of recommendations supported by LOE A did not significantly increase over time (IDSA/ATS: 13.3% [2016] vs. 14.8% [2008], p = 0.798; and SEIMC: 22.6% [2018] vs. 19% [2011], p = 0.568). In conclusion, IA is a condition with an urgent unmet clinical need for more high-quality randomized trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACC:

American College of Cardiology

AHA:

American Heart Association

ATS:

American Thoracic Society

CPG:

Clinical Practice Guidelines

ECIL:

European Conference on Infections and Leukemia

ECMM:

European Confederation of Medical Mycology

ERS:

European Respiratory Society

ESCMID:

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

GEMICOMED:

Grupo de Estudio de Micología Médica

IA:

Invasive Aspergillosis

IDSA:

Infectious Diseases Society of America

IPA:

Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis

LOE:

Level of Evidence

MA:

Meta-analysis

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

RCT:

Randomized Controlled Trial

SEIMC:

Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology

SR:

Systematic Review

References

  1. Bitar D, Lortholary O, Le Strat Y, Nicolau J, Coignard B, Tattevin P, Che D, Dromer F (2014) Population-based analysis of invasive fungal infections, France, 2001-2010. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1149–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cadena J, Thompson GR, Patterson TF (2016) Invasive aspergillosis: current strategies for diagnosis and management. Infect Dis Clin N Am 30:125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmiedel Y, Zimmerli S (2016) Common invasive fungal diseases: an overview of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis, cryptococcosis, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. Swiss Med Wkly. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2016.14281

  4. Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B, Beigelman-Aubry C, Lamoth F, Dunet V, Slavin M, Richardson MD (2019) Diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infections: looking ahead. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:ii27–ii37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer C, Bowers A, Wayant C, Checketts J, Scott J, Musuvathy S, Vassar M (2018) Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One 13:e0204720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC (2009) Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA 301:831–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan AR, Khan S, Zimmerman V, Baddour LM, Tleyjeh IM (2010) Quality and strength of evidence of the Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 51:1147–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P et al (2009) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy 64:669–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Jaeschke R, Pauker SG, Schünemann HJ (2008) Grades of recommendation for antithrombotic agents: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest 133:123S–131S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (1979) The Canadian guide to clinical preventive health care. Can Med Assoc J 121:1193–1254

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee DH, Vielemeyer O (2011) Analysis of overall level of evidence behind Infectious Diseases Society of America practice guidelines. Arch Intern Med 171:18–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs AK, Kushner FG, Ettinger SM et al (2013) ACCF/AHA clinical practice guideline methodology summit report: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:213–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wan K, Liang H, Yan G, Zou B, Huang C, Jiang M (2019) A quality assessment of evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and management of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. J Thorac Dis 11:2795–2807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campogiani L, Tejada S, Ferreira-Coimbra J, Restrepo MI, Rello J (2019) Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

  15. Patterson TF, Thompson GR, Denning DW et al (2016) Executive summary: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 63:433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW et al (2008) Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 46:327–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan-Akdagli S et al (2018) Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin Microbiol Infect 24(Suppl 1):e1–e38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Vidal C, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Aguilar-Guisado M et al (2018) Executive summary of clinical practice guideline for the management of invasive diseases caused by Aspergillus: 2018 update by the GEMICOMED-SEIMC/REIPI. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2018.03.018

  19. Fortún J, Carratalá J, Gavaldá J et al (2011) Guidelines for the treatment of invasive fungal disease by Aspergillus spp. and other fungi issued by the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC). 2011 update. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 29:435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fanaroff AC, Califf RM, Windecker S, Smith SC, Lopes RD (2019) Levels of Evidence Supporting American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines, 2008-2018. JAMA 321:1069–1080

  21. Tissot F, Agrawal S, Pagano L, Petrikkos G, Groll AH, Skiada A, Lass-Flörl C, Calandra T, Viscoli C, Herbrecht R (2017) ECIL-6 guidelines for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis and mucormycosis in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Haematologica 102:433–444

  22. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al (2008) Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis 46:1813–1821

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors appreciate comments from Maria Teresa Martin, Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital who helped to improve the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded in part by CIBERES, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (Fondos FEDER) (CB06–06-036). Dr. Blot holds a research mandate of the Special Research Fund at Ghent University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JR and ST designed the study. The recommendations were abstracted by a single reviewer (ST) and validated by two other reviewers (LC and JFC). ST analyzed data and writes the first manuscript draft. SJB provided statistical analyses and write methods. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. ST takes full responsibility for the integrity of reported data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofía Tejada.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr. Rello has served as consultant and in the speakers’ bureau for Pfizer and Astellas. Dr. Blot received research grants from Pfizer. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 14.9 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 15.4 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 14.2 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 15.8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tejada, S., Campogiani, L., Ferreira-Coimbra, J. et al. Levels of evidence supporting clinical practice guidelines on invasive aspergillosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39, 903–913 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03794-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03794-7

Keywords

Navigation