Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical factors influencing the performance of bacterial multiplex polymerase chain reaction in patients with community-onset pneumonia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The etiologic diagnostic yield of community-onset pneumonia (COP) using conventional methods is low. Bacterial multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) has been shown to be more sensitive than conventional methods. This study assessed the clinical factors influencing bacterial mPCR results in patients with COP. Patients with COP admitted to a tertiary care hospital between November 2015 and April 2016 were retrospectively assessed. Conventional methods included culture-based methods and serology for Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Bacterial mPCR that could identify Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophilia was performed. Bacterial mPCR was performed in a total of 342 patients with COP in the study. Bacterial mPCR alone provided etiology in 99 patients. The total etiologic diagnosis rates improved from 22.2 to 51.1% when bacterial mPCR was added to conventional methods. Additional diagnostic benefits of bacterial mPCR were more prominent in the prior antibiotic non-exposure group (77.8% vs 63.5%, P = 0.015) and in the low-risk group with low CURB 65 score (62.6% vs 44.9%, P = 0.005). Patients who required ICU care, those with healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), and patients with any underlying diseases were not associated with the additional pathogen detection rates using bacterial mPCR. By supplementing conventional diagnostic methods with bacterial mPCR-based methods, the overall pathogen detection rates improved in patients with COP. Moreover, the additional diagnostic usefulness of bacterial mPCR was significantly higher in patients without prior antibiotic exposure and in the mild-to-moderate-risk group with lower CURB 65 score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Musher DM, Thorner AR (2014) Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 371:1619–1628. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1312885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Prina E, Ranzani OT, Torres A (2015) Community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet 386:1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60733-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG (2007) Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 44(Suppl 2):S27–S72. https://doi.org/10.1086/511159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Welte T, Torres A, Nathwani D (2012) Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia among adults in Europe. Thorax 67:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.129502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartlett JG (2011) Diagnostic tests for agents of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 52(Suppl 4):S296–S304. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Putot A, Tetu J, Perrin S, Bailly H, Piroth L, Besancenot JF, Bonnotte B, Chavanet P, d’Athis P, Charles PE, Sordet-Guepet H, Manckoundia P (2016) Impact of microbiological samples in the hospital management of community-acquired, nursing home-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia in older patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35:489–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2565-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Vazquez E, Marcos MA, Mensa J, de Roux A, Puig J, Font C, Francisco G, Torres A (2004) Assessment of the usefulness of sputum culture for diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia using the PORT predictive scoring system. Arch Intern Med 164:1807–1811. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.16.1807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Musher DM, Roig IL, Cazares G, Stager CE, Logan N, Safar H (2013) Can an etiologic agent be identified in adults who are hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia: results of a one-year study. J Infect 67:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.03.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG, Fakhran S, Balk R, Bramley AM, Reed C, Grijalva CG, Anderson EJ, Courtney DM, Chappell JD, Qi C, Hart EM, Carroll F, Trabue C, Donnelly HK, Williams DJ, Zhu Y, Arnold SR, Ampofo K, Waterer GW, Levine M, Lindstrom S, Winchell JM, Katz JM, Erdman D, Schneider E, Hicks LA, McCullers JA, Pavia AT, Edwards KM, Finelli L (2015) Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 373:415–427. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Song JH, Oh WS, Kang CI, Chung DR, Peck KR, Ko KS, Yeom JS, Kim CK, Kim SW, Chang HH, Kim YS, Jung SI, Tong Z, Wang Q, Huang SG, Liu JW, Lalitha MK, Tan BH, Van PH, Carlos CC, So T (2008) Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients in Asian countries: a prospective study by the Asian network for surveillance of resistant pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.09.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chalmers JD, Taylor JK, Singanayagam A, Fleming GB, Akram AR, Mandal P, Choudhury G, Hill AT (2011) Epidemiology, antibiotic therapy, and clinical outcomes in health care-associated pneumonia: a UK cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 53:107–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gadsby NJ, Russell CD, McHugh MP, Mark H, Conway Morris A, Laurenson IF, Hill AT, Templeton KE (2016) Comprehensive molecular testing for respiratory pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 62:817–823. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ1214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gadsby NJ, McHugh MP, Russell CD, Mark H, Conway Morris A, Laurenson IF, Hill AT, Templeton KE (2015) Development of two real-time multiplex PCR assays for the detection and quantification of eight key bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:788.e781–788.e713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Holter JC, Muller F, Bjorang O, Samdal HH, Marthinsen JB, Jenum PA, Ueland T, Froland SS, Aukrust P, Husebye E, Heggelund L (2015) Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia and diagnostic yields of microbiological methods: a 3-year prospective study in Norway. BMC Infect Dis 15:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0803-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Johansson N, Kalin M, Tiveljung-Lindell A, Giske CG, Hedlund J (2010) Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia: increased microbiological yield with new diagnostic methods. Clin Infect Dis 50:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1086/648678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshii Y, Shimizu K, Morozumi M, Chiba N, Ubukata K, Uruga H, Hanada S, Wakui H, Ito S, Takasaka N, Minagawa S, Kojima J, Numata T, Hara H, Kawaishi M, Saito K, Araya J, Kaneko Y, Nakayama K, Kishi K, Kuwano K (2016) Identification of pathogens by comprehensive real-time PCR versus conventional methods in community-acquired pneumonia in Japanese adults. Infect Dis (Lond):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2016.1193788

  17. Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, van den Eeden WC, Graffelman AW, van den Broek PJ, Claas EC (2005) Improved diagnosis of the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Clin Infect Dis 41:345–351. https://doi.org/10.1086/431588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Caliendo AM (2011) Multiplex PCR and emerging technologies for the detection of respiratory pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 52(Suppl 4):S326–S330. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mustafa MI, Al-Marzooq F, How SH, Kuan YC, Ng TH (2011) The use of multiplex real-time PCR improves the detection of the bacterial etiology of community acquired pneumonia. Trop Biomed 28:531–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. (2016) Available at https://emcrit.org/ibcc/pneumonia/. Accessed 9 Dec 2016

  21. American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America (2005) Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:388–416. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200405-644ST

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung CL, Lee MA, Chung WS (2010) Clinical evaluation of the multiplex pcr assay for the detection of bacterial pathogens in respiratory specimens from patients with pneumonia. Korean J Clin Microbiol 13:40. https://doi.org/10.5145/kjcm.2010.13.1.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshii Y, Shimizu K, Morozumi M, Chiba N, Ubukata K, Uruga H, Hanada S, Wakui H, Ito S, Takasaka N, Minagawa S, Kojima J, Numata T, Hara H, Kawaishi M, Saito K, Araya J, Kaneko Y, Nakayama K, Kishi K, Kuwano K (2016) Identification of pathogens by comprehensive real-time PCR versus conventional methods in community-acquired pneumonia in Japanese adults. Infect Dis (Lond) 48:782–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2016.1193788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris AM, Bramley AM, Jain S, Arnold SR, Ampofo K, Self WH, Williams DJ, Anderson EJ, Grijalva CG, McCullers JA, Pavia AT, Wunderink RG, Edwards KM, Winchell JM, Hicks LA (2017) Influence of antibiotics on the detection of bacteria by culture-based and culture-independent diagnostic tests in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Open Forum Infect Dis 4:ofx014. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney DA, Palmer LB, Napolitano LM, O’Grady NP, Bartlett JG, Carratala J, El Solh AA, Ewig S, Fey PD, File TM Jr, Restrepo MI, Roberts JA, Waterer GW, Cruse P, Knight SL, Brozek JL (2016) Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 63:e61–e111. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yourassowsky E, Van der Linden MP, Crokaert F (1992) Comparative kill and growth rates determined with cefdinir and cefaclor and with Streptococcus pneumoniae and beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:46–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang L, Zong ZY, Liu YB, Ye H, Lv XJ (2011) PCR versus serology for diagnosing Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Indian J Med Res 134:270–280

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyong Ran Peck.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Konkuk University Medical Center.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, G.E., Peck, K.R., Ko, JH. et al. Clinical factors influencing the performance of bacterial multiplex polymerase chain reaction in patients with community-onset pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39, 1193–1199 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03741-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03741-6

Keywords

Navigation