Skip to main content

Serological and molecular rapid diagnostic tests for Toxoplasma infection in humans and animals

Abstract

Infection by Toxoplasma gondii is prevalent worldwide. The parasite can infect a broad spectrum of vertebrate hosts, but infection of fetuses and immunocompromised patients is of particular concern. Easy-to-perform, robust, and highly sensitive and specific methods to detect Toxoplasma infection are important for the treatment and management of patients. Rapid diagnostic methods that do not sacrifice the accuracy of the assay and give reproducible results in a short time are highly desirable. In this context, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), especially with point-of-care (POC) features, are promising diagnostic methods in clinical microbiology laboratories, especially in areas with minimal laboratory facilities. More advanced methods using microfluidics and sensor technology will be the future trend. In this review, we discuss serological and molecular-based rapid diagnostic tests for detecting Toxoplasma infection in humans as well as animals.

Introduction

Congenital Toxoplasma infection is the transmission of T. gondii from mother to fetus through the placenta, leading to potential fetal death, abortion, infantile neurologic defects, and chorioretinitis [1,2,3]. The incidence of congenital Toxoplasma infection varies from region to region; however, the prevalence is proportional to the socioeconomic conditions, unhygienic lifestyle, and feline population [3, 4]. Early detection of congenital Toxoplasma infection may reduce transplacental transmission and lessen the fetal disease burden [5, 6]. Usually, T. gondii infection in pregnant women is asymptomatic, and countries like Austria [7], France [8], and Brazil [9] conduct routine maternal screening to identify the infected pregnant woman and provide early treatment.

T. gondii remains dormant in infected tissues and may reactivate in immunocompromised individuals, leading to potentially fatal complications [10, 11]. HIV patients and hematopoietic stem cell and heart transplant recipients are more susceptible to T. gondii infection [12]. Cerebral Toxoplasma infection is considered the third most prevalent opportunistic illness in HIV-infected populations [13].

In veterinary medicine, Toxoplasma infection is also a serious health concern. T. gondii infects a vast range of animal species, including wild, pet, and domesticated animals. T. gondii oocysts in feline feces contaminate the surroundings and undergo sporulation in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The oocysts are resistant to various chemicals and disinfectants that are routinely used by the water supply industry; thus, contaminated water reservoirs are a significant factor in outbreaks of Toxoplasma infection in humans and animals [14,15,16]. In small ruminants, the infection may lead to abortions, fetal mummification, stillbirths, or births of weak offspring [17, 18]. As compared to its prevalence in cattle, the prevalence of T. gondii is higher in sheep, goats, and pigs [19, 20]. T. gondii was detected mainly in sheep’s brain and heart tissues; in contrast, no parasite was detected in tissue samples taken from experimentally infected cattle [21]. Reproductive failure in goats and sheep is a substantial economic loss, which may impact the lives of people who are dependent on ruminant meat production as a source of income.

In developed countries and big cities in developing countries, medical laboratories favor the use of fully automated systems such as BioPlex™ 2200 (Bio-Rad) that ensure quality and allow high-throughput testing [22]. However, most of the tests are neither accessible nor affordable to patients in the developing world. A point-of-care (POC) test is a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), providing test results to the patients at health centers, in the field, or at screening sites. RDT is considered advantageous over central laboratory testing in terms of robustness, simplicity, and ease in handling [23]. According to the World Health Organization, an RDT device should comply with the guidelines termed as “ASSURED” which is an acronym for affordable, sensitive, specific, user-friendly, rapid/robust, equipment-free, and deliverable to those who need it [24,25,26]. Although RDT devices for HIV infection, malaria, and syphilis are available [27], efforts are needed to develop RDT for a broad range of infections to reduce the mortality and morbidity cases in remote areas. While devising an RDT, several variables including the characteristic features of the infected population, antigen, genetic variation of the pathogen and/or host, the test methodology (use of recombinant or native antigen), and the physical format of the test (manual or automated) must be considered and optimized [28]. The present review discusses RDTs based on immunoassays and molecular methods for detecting T. gondii infection in both humans and animals.

Rapid immunodiagnostic tests

A broad range of serological tests for Toxoplasma infection is available with various methodologies and antigens which can detect different immunoglobulin isotypes. Most are not RDTs and are targeted for laboratories with good infrastructure and skilled personnel. The assays include Sabin-Feldman dye test (DT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunosorbent agglutination assay (ISAGA), indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), indirect fluorescent antibody tests (IFATs), modified agglutination test (MAT), and Western blot (WB) [29].

Lateral flow assay

In the lateral flow assay (LFT), a sample buffer is used to drive the test sample (e.g., serum or blood) along a solid substrate through capillary action, and the result is obtained in less than 30 min [30]. This assay, also called immunochromatography test (ICT), has become a well-established and widely accepted POC approach [31, 32]. As compared to other serum-based diagnostic tests, ICT is simple, rapid, and cost-effective and demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity, making it suitable for field application [33]. Table 1 shows RDTs that have been reported for detection of Toxoplasma infection in humans and animals. Toxoplasma ICT IgG-IgM (LDBIO Diagnostic, Lyon, France; LDBIO) is a commercial rapid POC test, which detects Toxoplasma-specific IgG/IgM antibodies. T. gondii native antigen used as the test line and rabbit gamma globulin as the control line are blotted on a nitrocellulose membrane. At one end of the cassette, red latex particles conjugated with T. gondii antigen and blue latex particles conjugated with goat anti-rabbit antibody are adsorbed on fiberglass support. After dispensing the serum sample, if specific IgG/IgM is present, a red line will appear at the test line while a blue line will appear at the control line [41]. This POC test is highly effective and can be considered a first-line screening test. The device accurately identified seropositive USA patients with known T. gondii infection and distinguished them from seronegative individuals. Moreover, it has the potential to identify acute infection accurately [34, 41]. In the USA, both the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were found to be 100% [34], while in France, the sensitivity and specificity were reported to be 97% and 96%, respectively, as compared to the Architect fully automated chemiluminescence test (Abbott North, Chicago, IL) [41].

Table 1 Immunochromatography (ICT) tests that detect Toxoplasma infection in humans and animals

The diagnostic values of the LDBIO test and two other commercial POC tests, i.e., Toxo IgG/IgM Rapid test (Biopanda Reagents, Belfast, UK) and OnSite Toxo IgG/IgM Combo Rapid Test (CTK-Biotech, San Diego, CA), were compared. They were evaluated against reference tests used at the Palo Alto Medical Foundation Toxoplasma Serology Laboratory (PAMF-TSL) [35]. The sensitivity (n = 170) of all the three tests for T. gondii-specific IgG detection was 100% while the specificity (n = 80) was almost similar across the tests, i.e., Biopanda 96.3%, OnSite 97.5%, and LDBIO 98.8%. In contrast, the sensitivity (n = 82) of the POC tests for IgM detection was variable, i.e., Biopanda 62.2%, OnSite 28%, and LDBIO 100% [35]. The Biopanda and OnSite devices also displayed poor visualization of test lines due to the faint color in a proportion of the tests performed. Since the LDBIO test demonstrated 100% sensitivity and exhibited negligible false-positive results, it is advantageous for universal screening of Toxoplasma infection [35]. In short, the LDBIO POC test addresses the limitations of automated screening methods, i.e., not sufficiently sensitive for IgG detection and lack of specificity for IgM detection [42].

The LFT cassette test architecture may also influence the test sensitivity. The LDBIO test detects both IgG and IgM antibodies using a nitrocellulose membrane strip lined with native Toxoplasma antigen and latex-coated Toxoplasma antigen adsorbed on the conjugate pad. Thus, anti-human IgG/IgM antibody is not used as a test reagent. On the other hand, the Biopanda and OnSite tests have two distinct lines for IgG and IgM detection. In both tests, anti-human IgG and IgM antibodies are separately lined on the nitrocellulose strip; however, the Biopanda test uses two nitrocellulose strips, one for each antibody class, while in the OnSite test, the two antibodies are lined separately on one nitrocellulose strip. Both Biopanda and OnSite tests use colloidal gold-conjugated recombinant protein adsorbed on the conjugate pad. All three tests also include a control line.

The use of recombinant antigens has the advantage of standardized antigen production. In the past two decades, several Toxoplasma recombinant antigens have been cloned and expressed in E. coli or yeast for use as diagnostic reagents for human and animal infections. They include antigens from the parasite surface (SAGs), matrix (MAGs), dense granule (GRAs), rhoptry (ROPs), and microneme (MICs) [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Four of the recombinant antigens (SAG1, SAG2, GRA3, and GRA6) expressed in E. coli have been used in an RDT to detect infection in cats. Among them, recombinant SAG1 demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity, i.e., 100% and 99.2%, respectively [40]. In another study, the N-terminal half of SAG1A was linked to the intrinsic unstructured domain of GRA2 and conjugated with 40-nm colloidal gold particles [36]. The structurally modified rSAG1A-GRA2-based RDT showed 100% specificity and 97.1% sensitivity for detection of human Toxoplasma infection as compared to a laboratory ELISA that used T. gondii whole cell lysate antigen [36]. An RDT kit comprising GST-linked SAG1A has been used to detect Toxoplasma infection in Seokmo-do (Island) in Ganghwa-gun, Incheon City, South Korea [51].

The diagnostic value of gold colloid-conjugated recombinant GRA7 for rapid detection of Toxoplasma infection has been evaluated in animals [52]. The ICT identified T. gondii-infected mice from those uninfected or infected with Neospora caninum. Pig sera were also tested with the ICT, and the results were found to be quite consistent with those obtained using the latex agglutination test (LAT) and indirect ELISA. However, samples with low OD (< 0.3) values in GRA7-based ELISA were negative in the ICT since the low titer of antibody in the samples could not capture enough conjugated antigen to develop a color reaction on the strip [52]. Nevertheless, the ICT using GRA7 demonstrated promising results as a diagnostic test for routine rapid testing in the clinic and mass screening of animal samples in the field. In a more recent study, ICT strips based on GRA7 have been used to detect Toxoplasma-specific serum IgG in human samples [53]. The diagnostic sensitivity of the assay was 100% while the specificity was 96.7%, with only one false-positive result.

Wang et al. used ICT strips to detect Toxoplasma circulating antigens in the blood of animals that were experimentally infected with the Gansu Jingtai strain of T. gondii [38]. Immunoglobulin G, specific to excretory/secretory antigens (ESA) of T. gondii, was produced in sheep immunized intramuscularly with the antigen. Purified anti-ESA IgG was conjugated with gold, and the resulting colloidal gold-conjugated anti-ESA IgG was blotted on a glass fiber. Sera from experimentally infected animals including pigs, goats, sheep, and rabbits that were intraperitoneally infected with tachyzoites were analyzed, and the results were compared with ELISA. A 100% agreement between both assays was reported; moreover, the strips did not show any cross-reactivity with antigens of Neospora caninum [38]. In a more recent study, an ICT comprising gold particles conjugated with a monoclonal antibody against SAG3, which is expressed in all the infective stages of T. gondii, was analyzed [39]. The assay demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity compared to another antibody assay which used GRA7 recombinant antigen [52]. The detection limit of the SAG3-ICT was 100 ng with visual detection under optimal conditions of analysis. No cross-reactivity was found when evaluated with porcine serum samples infected with Cryptosporidium suis, Mycoplasma suis, Streptococcus suis, Salmonella choleraesuis, Cysticercus cellulosae, Isospora suis, and Trichinella spiralis.

For detection of Toxoplasma infection in cats and dogs, a modified version of ICT assay, the dynamic flow immunochromatographic test (DFICT) which utilizes immunochromatography and fluid dynamics, has been proposed [54]. T. gondii recombinant antigen and staphylococcal protein A (SPA), fixed on nitrocellulose membrane at points designated as a test (T) and control (C), respectively, were used as capture reagents. A volume of 100 μl liquid gold-SPA conjugate was added to the reagent hole, and 5 μl of serum was added to the sample hole, and the result was visualized within 5 min. The assay was highly sensitive and detected antibodies even when at 1:320 serum dilution, and demonstrated no cross-reactivity with antibodies from other related canine pathogens (distemper virus, parvovirus, coronavirus, leishmania, and Neospora caninum) or feline pathogens (panleukopenia virus, calicivirus, and N. caninum). Furthermore, the DFICT did not show any change in sensitivity or specificity when stored at 4 °C for several months. A high degree of consistency was seen between DFICT and a commercial ELISA kit, suggesting that the novel test strip was reliable [54]. The conjugate pad in an ICT is dried gold-conjugate on glass fiber membranes, whereas the DFICT makes use of liquid gold conjugate, thereby making the manufacturing process for DFICT simpler since no drying facility or low humidity control is required. Also, in an ICT assay, the serum sample is driven by a chase buffer [31, 55], while in a DFICT, there is no need for washing or blocking during sample addition, between sample and visualization, or at the termination step of the reaction [54].

A fluid-phase immunoassay overcomes some disadvantages of a solid-phase immunoassay such as suboptimal detection of conformational epitopes, high background signal, and narrow dynamic range of detection, which may sometimes lead to false-positive results and lower sensitivity [56, 57]. An example of a fluid-phase immunoassay is luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) which makes use of light-emitting luciferase-recombinant antigen fusion protein to quantitatively determine serum antibody titers [57]. The highly linear light output of the luciferase increases the dynamic range of detection to about seven orders of magnitude. LIPS has the potential to detect antibodies associated with various autoimmune and infectious diseases, and is advantageous in terms of short incubation time, little background signal, high sensitivity and specificity, and having the ability to be multiplexed [57,58,59]. A LIPS-based rapid immunoassay, LIPSTICKS, has been designed for rapid detection of serum antibodies in one minute [60]. Fast reaction kinetics, the ability to efficiently detect conformational epitopes, quantitative results, and a large dynamic range of detection make LIPSTICKS superior to ICT. Additionally, LIPSTICKS requires a very small volume of serum (0.1 μl) or saliva (10 μl) per test and a simple dilution step [60]. LIPSTICKS can be developed for a wide range of diseases by merely changing the luciferase-tagged antigen [60]. LIPS technology has been successfully employed to diagnose a wide range of diseases including hepatitis C virus (HCV) [61], Lyme disease [62], strongyloidiasis [63], loaisis [64], and onchocerciasis [65]. More recently, Aye et al. [66] have used LIPS for the serodiagnosis of Toxoplasma infection. Four fusion proteins of nanoluciferase (Nluc, a small luciferase enzyme) and T. gondii antigens including GRA6, GRA7, GRA8, and bradyzoite antigens (BAG1) expressed in E. coli were used in the assay. With sera from experimentally infected mice, LIPS assay detected Toxoplasma-specific antibodies against Nluc-GRA6, Nluc-GRA7, and Nluc-GRA8 as early as day 14. Meanwhile, the antibody to Nluc-BAG1 was not detected even up to day 21; however, the antibody appeared in the serum on day 60. The detection limits of the LIPS assay with standard human sera (WHO standard anti-Toxoplasma human immunoglobulin, TOXM) were 3.9, 2, 1, and 1 IU/ml for rGRA6, rGRA7, rGRA8, and rBAG1, respectively [66].

Immunosensors

Biosensors are diagnostic devices that change biological responses to a quantifiable signal. These devices have two main components, a bioreceptor for target recognition and a transducer which converts this recognition into an electrical signal [67]. Based on signal transduction methods, immunosensors can be divided into four main groups, i.e., electrochemical, optical, piezoelectric, and thermal or calorimetric [30, 68]. Chip-based miniaturized, portable, and self-containing immunosensors are highly desired in diagnostic laboratories for detecting serum biomarkers. Advances in nanotechnology have led to the development of nanomaterials including gold nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, magnetic nanoparticles, and graphene that could be used in immunosensors [69].

Optical and piezoelectric biosensors

Optical detection of fluorescent labels or apparent color change due to enzymatic reaction is the most common detection method and regarded as the “gold standard.” These methods have high detection sensitivities ranging from nanogram to picogram per milliliter and are the simplest forms of biosensor signals to generate and analyze [70, 71]. The generated optical signal is either fluorescent or luminescent; the former is a result of excitation of a label such as a fluorophore or quantum dot immobilized on the surface of the sensor. A luminescent signal is produced after an enzymatic reaction of horseradish peroxidase with a luminogenic substrate such as luminol and luciferin.

Surface plasmon resonance is an optical phenomenon based on the generation of electromagnetic waves (plasmons). In a plasmonic immunosensor, a metallic surface is prepared by immobilizing specific antibodies. Antigen/antibody interaction on the metallic surface changes the refractive index/thickness, resulting in a shift in the resonance curve of the reflected light that is directly related to the concentration of the bound biomarker [72]. High sensitivity and broad dynamic range make the plasmonic biosensor ideal for clinical diagnostic applications [73]. The plasmonic gold film can detect a panel of antibodies over an array of spatially defined antigen spots, which gives a multicolor fluorescence in the visible-to-near infrared region (500 to 900 nm). The test can be performed with a single drop of serum or whole blood. The multicolor detection scheme has the potential to differentiate between patients with acute and chronic infections. The sensitivity and specificity of the method were reported to be similar to those of well-established assays used in the USA National Reference Laboratories for Toxoplasma infection [74]. The potential of the plasmonic gold chips to detect Toxoplasma IgG was similar to that of the IgG dye test [75, 76]. Also, the plasmonic gold chip can detect IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies in serum or whole blood in a single run [74] and is comparable to the commercial multiplexed test using the BioPlex 2200 system (Bio-Rad) which is based on Luminex technology [22]. The approximate time for the detection of IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies with a plasmonic gold chip is about 2 h at USD10 per patient [74]. With ~ 1 μl serum sample, the multiplex plasmonic gold platform has been used for the detection of IgG/IgM in seroconverted, chronically infected, non-infected, and newborns in Nice, France [77]. Other advantages of the plasmonic biosensor are its potential to be miniaturized and multiplexed. By integrating plasmonic biosensors with microfluidics, a rapid POC device can be developed [78]. Economical fabrication methods to build these nanostructures have been developed by using plastics and polymers as substrates [79, 80].

Laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) is another type of optical detection approach, which is broadly used for the microfluidic immunosensor design [81, 82]. Recently, LIF microfluidic chips have been used in many research fields including lab-on-chip [83], POC testing [84, 85], and organic compound analysis [86]. A microfluidic immunosensor based on LIF has been developed for the quantitative detection of IgG antibodies against T. gondii in humans [87]. Zinc oxide nanoparticle covered with chitosan was used to conjugate T. gondii antigen and placed into a central microfluidic channel. Serum samples from patients with Toxoplasma infection were incubated with T. gondii antigen on the microfluidic channel. The signal was generated by adding alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-labeled anti-IgG antibody, followed by the substrate, non-fluorescent 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphatase, which is converted to fluorescent product. The relative fluorescence of the enzymatic product was quantified, and the intensity of the fluorescence was directly linked to the concentration of serum antibodies [87]. The incorporation of chitosan-coated zinc oxide nanoparticles into the microfluidic channel improved the sensitivity as well as simplified the operating procedure by reducing the analysis time to 31 min [87]. Attempts have been made to exploit the potential POC benefits of microfluidics by miniaturizing and integrating the optical elements, including using amorphous silicon photodiodes [88] and optical fiber light guides [89]. A POC device based on LIF microfluidics has the potential to decrease the time and quantity of reactants for analysis, along with multiplexing and portability [84].

Aptamers are single-stranded nucleic acid molecules that specifically bind to the target molecules and are widely used in diagnosis, as target delivery agents, and for therapeutic purposes [90]. The process of selecting aptamers is called systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). Structure versatility, high affinity to their targets, and easy conjugation, as well as easy labeling, are some of the attractive features of aptamers for use in developing diagnostic tools [91]. A quantum dots-based aptasensor for the detection of Toxoplasma infection in humans has been reported [92]. As compared to conventional ELISA and colloidal gold immunodot assay, the aptasensor (aptamer-IgG-aptamer complex) showed increased sensitivity [92].

Piezoelectric biosensors, based on quartz chips, are promising transducers for the rapid and simple detection of viruses, bacteria, proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules [93]. Piezoelectric immunosensors are mass-sensitive devices in which the agglutination of an immobilized antigen/antibody on the surface of an oscillating quartz and target biomarker antigen/antibody increases the mass of the crystal and proportionally reduces the frequency of oscillation of the crystals. The immunosensor then records and quantifies the variation in the frequency of the electrical signal produced due to the antigen-antibody agglutination. A gold nanoparticle-based piezoelectric immunosensor has been used to detect T. gondii-specific antibodies in serum of infected rabbits [94]. The immunosensor was highly sensitive and demonstrated significant results even in the presence of highly diluted (1:5500) anti-T. gondii antibody [94]. Moreover, the analytical results were consistent with that of ELISA; thus, this technique could be a promising method for diagnosing Toxoplasma infection [94].

Electrochemical biosensors

An electrochemical biosensor utilizes the electrocatalytic activity of graphene sheets, a tightly packed flat layer of carbon atoms which act as a two-dimensional material. It has unique physicochemical properties like rapid electron transport, excellent electrical conductivity, and thermal stability [95, 96]. Good performance of electrochemical biosensors has been achieved by improving gold-coated magnetic nanoparticles in terms of their morphology, particle size, effective surface area, functionality, adsorption capacity, and electron transfer properties [97, 98]. A sandwich-type electrochemical biosensor with anti-IgM goldmag and graphene sheets has been proposed for detecting T. gondii-specific IgM antibodies [99]. The use of goldmag is a simple method which does not need chemicals for immunosensor regeneration. T. gondii antigen was immobilized onto goldmag nanoparticles attached to a nafion-graphene sheets-modified electrode. Following incubation with serum and HRP-labeled anti-IgM antibodies, an electrochemical signal was generated by adding hydrogen peroxide as the substrate [99]. The biosensor was biocompatible and demonstrated good conductivity and specificity.

Molecular diagnostics

Direct detection of acute Toxoplasma infection in humans can be performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which amplifies the DNA of T. gondii in amniotic fluid, eye fluid, tissues, or blood [100, 101]. For the rapid and sensitive detection of Toxoplasma infection, real-time PCR assays and targets including B1gene which occurs in 35 copies in T. gondii genome have been reported [102,103,104]. A 529-bp (GenBank Accession No. AF146527) sequence of unknown function which is repeated 200- to 300-fold in T. gondii genome was used to develop a sensitive and specific PCR assay [105]. This sequence was found to be present in all the 60 strains of T. gondii tested, and distinguished the DNA of T. gondii from the DNA of humans and mice, or DNA from other parasites, including Echinococcus granulosis, Giardia duodenalis, Plasmodium falciparum, Sarcocystis spp., Trichinella spiralis, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Neospora caninum [105]. A comparative study of the amplification of the 529-bp sequence and B1 gene using a low amount of DNA has shown that detection of the former sequence increased the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of the assay [106]. However, it was reported that some T. gondii strains partially or entirely lose their 529-bp repetitive units which can compromise the assay efficiency [107].

Nested-PCR utilizing the GRA7 gene has been proposed as a good target for primer design to detect T. gondii. A nested PCR assay with potential to detect clonal and atypical strains of T. gondii was developed by analyzing the genome of different strains of the parasite; this resulted in GRA7 being identified as the most appropriate target for amplification [100]. Many conserved regions are present throughout the GRA7 sequence which can be used for primer design. Moreover, GRA7 plays a significant role in the parasitophorous vacuole, involved in sequestration of host endolysosomes, and expressed in all infectious stages including tachyzoite, bradyzoite, merozoite, and sporozoite [108]. A nested PCR assay amplifying conserved regions in GRA7 demonstrated sensitivity and specificity comparable to the 529-bp fragment, and was more sensitive than the B1 gene; thus, GRA7 could prove to be an alternative target for amplification particularly when the genetic diversity of the parasite is of concern [100].

An isothermal amplification technique allows DNA amplification to be performed rapidly. Two of the techniques that have been used for the rapid detection of Toxoplasma are “Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification” (LAMP) and “Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification” (NASBA).

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification

LAMP provides an opportunity to amplify DNA rapidly with high specificity and efficiency under isothermal conditions (64 °C), thus serving as an RDT [109]. This method makes use of four specific primers that bind at six different sequences on the same target DNA. Unlike conventional PCR, this method is simple and inexpensive and does not need purified DNA for efficient amplification. The reaction can be accomplished in a single tube in a simple incubator, and the results can be read within one hour. The characteristic features like rapid amplification, simple operation, and easy read-out system are useful for robust and reliable detection of infection at the early stage [110]. This technique is a promising molecular detection approach to be used in developing countries where Toxoplasma infection is endemic. In humans, the LAMP method has been developed using three T. gondii genes, i.e., SAG1, SAG2, and B1 [111]. The sensitivity and specificity of the LAMP method were evaluated by comparing with conventional nested PCR; the former was found to be ten times more sensitive than the latter. The LAMP method showed a detection limit of 0.1 tachyzoite and no cross-reactivity with blood samples obtained from healthy individuals and patients with other parasitic infections such as Plasmodium spp. and Brugia malayi [111].

Species-specific LAMP primers have been designed using a T. gondii 529-bp sequence to improve the LAMP assay [110]. Compared to conventional PCR which detected 2.5% (5/200) of samples, the LAMP assay detected 7% (14/200) of samples. This assay has been produced as a commercial kit by DiaSorin®, called the IAM TOXO Q-LAMP kit, which was named later as Iam TOXO [112]. The IAm Toxo was reported to be highly sensitive and robust and gave good results compared to the alternative amplification technologies [112]. The LAMP method has also been used to detect primary Toxoplasma infection in high-risk pregnant women with previous spontaneous abortion history [113]. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of LAMP were compared with quantitative real-time PCR. Both techniques demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity using an advanced melting curve analysis. Furthermore, no positive results were obtained in samples that were extracted from other parasites including Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Blastocystis, Leishmania spp., and Plasmodium spp. [113]. Both techniques were then employed to detect recent T. gondii infection in 77/139 IgG negative women who suffered from spontaneous abortion. The result showed that both techniques were positive in eight samples, thus confirming primary Toxoplasma infection [113].

Toxoplasma infection has also been reported in malignancies such as lymphoma, leukemia, or multiple myeloma [114]. To devise a specific and accurate method for detecting Toxoplasma infection in the blood of children with leukemia, the technical performance of LAMP was compared with that of nested PCR by targeting two repetitive conserved regions (RE and B1) in the T. gondii genome [115]. The results showed that the LAMP assay was superior in terms of sensitivity and specificity using the same genomic DNA extracted from mice tachyzoites and blood samples of leukemic patients.

Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification

Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) is an isothermal method that has been proposed as an efficient diagnostic approach for amplifying RNA targets of viable cells and adapted in clinical diagnostics [116]. The NASBA method to detect live tachyzoites of T. gondii in the peritoneal cavities of mice based on the amplification of the tachyzoites’ B1 rRNA gene has been developed [117]. The amplified gene yielded an amplicon of 116 bp on an agarose gel. The application of real-time NASBA is advantageous since it accelerates the analysis, minimizes the steps and risk of contamination, and precludes errors during the process [118]. This method employs molecular beacons which are small, single-stranded hairpin nucleic acid probes. The beacons generate a fluorescent signal after binding to the target, and the amplicons can be directly detected in a single tube. The signal is then recorded by a fluorimeter, thereby eliminating the need for running an agarose gel. Moreover, the detection limit of NASBA was one parasite/milliliter of blood while that of RT-PCR was ten parasites/milliliter [118].

Discussion

Accurate detection of parasitic infection underpins a holistic approach to its control and management. Conventional ELISA is a reliable technique; however, it is time-consuming and cumbersome due to liquid handling, and needs expensive equipment and reagents along with trained technicians [119]. Inexpensive, easy-to-use, rapid, sensitive, and specific detection tools may help to reduce the burden and impact of diseases in low-resource areas. Despite the high demand, a relatively limited number of validated rapid diagnostics are commercially available for parasitic infections, including Toxoplasma. The LFT strip, as the most commonly available POC test, has several advantages, including its rapidity in getting results, cost-effectiveness, application at point-of-care, and long shelf life; does not need refrigeration especially during transportation; and pretreatment is usually not required for fluid samples [120]. Some of the shortcomings of the LFT strips include the fact that majority are qualitative tests, they are not high throughput, most are not multiplexed, and there may be obstruction of the pores due to the matrix components [120, 121].

T. gondii recombinant proteins have demonstrated significant specificity and sensitivity in detection assays. However, none of the assays based on the recombinant antigens seemed to be able to replace native tachyzoite antigen in IgG/IgM-based tests. For instance, the diagnostic sensitivities for IgM detection of two commercial POC tests which use recombinant T. gondii antigen, i.e., Biopanda Toxo IgG/IgM and OnSite Toxo IgG/IgM, were found to be much lower compared to that of the LDBIO Toxoplasma ICT IgG-IgM test which makes use of whole-cell lysate of tachyzoites from the T. gondii RH Sabin Type I strain [35].

Chimeric antigens are composed of different distinct immunoreactive epitopes of T. gondii antigens, and it is likely that serum antibodies from a Toxoplasma-infected person will bind with at least one of the epitopes [122, 123]. Therefore, the application of a chimeric recombinant antigen is considered potentially more efficient than that of single antigens for developing a diagnostic method for Toxoplasma infection [122, 124]. Two “artificial” antigens named as EC2 and EC3 containing six distinct regions of MIC2, MIC3, SAG1, GRA3, GRA7, and M2AP have been genetically engineered. All the individual polypeptides in both chimeric antigens retained their antigenic properties in IgG/IgM ELISA [125]. Both improved the serological diagnosis of Toxoplasma infection in adults with acquired infection and infants with primary infection, indicating that the gene fusion did not affect the antigenic properties of each epitope in the chimeric format. Compared to the commercial assays [ELFA-IgM (bioMérieux, France) or ETI-TOXOK-M (DiaSorin, Italy)] which detected only 35% of the infected infants, IgM-ELISA utilizing GST-EC2 and GST-EC3 detected 70% of serum samples of infants with congenital Toxoplasma infection [125]. In another example, a chimeric antigen comprising immunodominant regions of MIC1, MAG1, and SAG1 demonstrated better results for the detection of serum IgG than by ELISA using Toxoplasma lysate antigen [126]. Thus, the chimeric antigen can substitute the preparation of parasite lysate in clinical diagnostic tests [127]. To date, a chimeric antigen has not been used in developing an RDT; however, it can be envisaged that chimeric antigens which perform well in IgG/IgM-ELISA can be readily developed into RDTs, including those capable of differentiating between recently acquired and past infection. Based on the market need, biomarkers for Toxoplasma infection can also be combined with biomarkers of other relevant infections in a multiplex POC immune chip.

The unique electrical, magnetic, luminescent, and catalytic properties of nanomaterials allow rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive diagnosis of microbial infections, and confer the potential for real-time detection of target biomarkers in a small volume of patient sample [128]. Also, advances in nanotechnology, microfluidics, biosensors, and synthetic biology have given rise to the generation of miniature-sized laboratory systems known as “lab-on-chip” devices [129]. It can also address the demand of nucleic acid testing at the POC level that integrates all the steps from sample preparation to nucleic acid amplification and detection in a single device [130]. The advantages of multi-function microfluidic lab-on-chip technology include robustness, small sample volume, enhanced reproducibility, fast analysis, accurate quantification and automation of all steps from sample preparation to signal generation and detection. Currently, the microfluidic chip is still expensive due to manufacturing procedures, non-scalability, and requirement of a microscopic syringe pump for operation. It is thus not surprising that such a device is still not available commercially for Toxoplasma detection. Researchers are still striving to produce POC lab-on-chip devices that are more affordable and suitable for low resource settings and mass screening [131]. We can thus look forward to the future availability of highly sensitive, specific, portable, and inexpensive, rapid diagnostic devices for Toxoplasma infection in humans and animals.

References

  1. Liu Q, Wang Z-D, Huang S-Y, Zhu X-Q (2015) Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasit Vectors 8(1):292

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. McAuley JB (2014) Congenital toxoplasmosis. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society 3(suppl_1):S30–S35

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fontes AA, Carvalho SAdS, Andrade GMQd, Carellos EV, Romanelli RC, Resende LMd (2019) Study of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in early diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 85(4):447-455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitsuka-Breganó R, Lopes-Mori FMR, Navarro IT (2010) Toxoplasmose adquirida na gestação e congênita: vigilância em saúde, diagnóstico, tratamento e condutas. EDUEL: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788572166768

  5. Wallon M, Peyron F (2018) Congenital toxoplasmosis: a plea for a neglected disease. Pathogens 7(1): E25

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Avelino MM, Amaral WN, Rodrigues IM, Rassi AR, Gomes MB, Costa TL, Castro AM (2014) Congenital toxoplasmosis and prenatal care state programs. BMC Infect Dis 14:33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Prusa A-R, Kasper DC, Sawers L, Walter E, Hayde M, Stillwaggon E (2017) Congenital toxoplasmosis in Austria: prenatal screening for prevention is cost-saving. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(7):e0005648

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Peyron F, Mc Leod R, Ajzenberg D, Contopoulos-Ioannidis D, Kieffer F, Mandelbrot L, Sibley LD, Pelloux H, Villena I, Wallon M, Montoya JG (2017) Congenital toxoplasmosis in France and the United States: one parasite, two diverging approaches. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(2):e0005222

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopes-Mori FMR, Mitsuka-Breganó R, Bittencourt LHFB, Dias RCF, Gonçalves DD, Capobiango JD, Reiche EMV, Morimoto HK, Freire RL, Navarro IT (2013) Gestational toxoplasmosis in Paraná State, Brazil: prevalence of IgG antibodies and associated risk factors. Braz J Infect Dis 17:405–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mele A, Paterson PJ, Prentice HG, Leoni P, Kibbler CC (2002) Toxoplasmosis in bone marrow transplantation: a report of two cases and systematic review of the literature. Bone Marrow Transplant 29:691

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hosseininejad Z, Sharif M, Sarvi S, Amouei A, Hosseini SA, Nayeri Chegeni T, Anvari D, Saberi R, Gohardehi S, Mizani A, Sadeghi M, Daryani A (2018) Toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12(6):e0006545

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Machala L, Kodym P, Maly M, Geleneky M, Beran O, Jilich D (2015) Toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol 64(2):59–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bowen LN, Smith B, Reich D, Quezado M, Nath A (2016) HIV-associated opportunistic CNS infections: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 12:662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dumetre A, Le Bras C, Baffet M, Meneceur P, Dubey JP, Derouin F, Duguet JP, Joyeux M, Moulin L (2008) Effects of ozone and ultraviolet radiation treatments on the infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Vet Parasitol 153(3–4):209–213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baldursson S, Karanis P (2011) Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks - an update 2004-2010. Water Res 45(20):6603–6614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blader IJ, Coleman BI, Chen C-T, Gubbels M-J (2015) Lytic cycle of Toxoplasma gondii: 15 years later. Annu Rev Microbiol 69(1):463–485

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Giadinis ND, Lafi SQ, Ioannidou E, Papadopoulos E, Terpsidis K, Karanikolas G, Petridou EJ, Brozos C, Karatzias H (2013) Reduction of the abortion rate due to toxoplasma in 3 goat herds following administration of sulfadimidine. Can Vet J 54(11):1080–1082

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Anastasia D, Elias P, Nikolaos P, Charilaos K, Nektarios G (2013) Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum seroprevalence in dairy sheep and goats mixed stock farming. Vet Parasitol 198(3):387–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dubey JP (2009) Toxoplasmosis in pigs—the last 20 years. Vet Parasitol 164(2):89–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dubey JP (2009) Toxoplasmosis in sheep—the last 20 years. Vet Parasitol 163(1):1–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Esteban-Redondo I, Maley SW, Thomson K, Nicoll S, Wright S, Buxton D, Innes EA (1999) Detection of T. gondii in tissues of sheep and cattle following oral infection. Vet Parasitol 86(3):155–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guigue N, Menotti J, Hamane S, Derouin F, Garin YJ (2014) Performance of the BioPlex 2200 flow immunoassay in critical cases of serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 21(4):496–500

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McPartlin DA, O'Kennedy RJ (2014) Point-of-care diagnostics, a major opportunity for change in traditional diagnostic approaches: potential and limitations. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 14(8):979–998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mabey D, Peeling RW, Ustianowski A, Perkins MD (2004) Diagnostics for the developing world. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weerakoon KG, McManus DP (2016) Cell-free DNA as a diagnostic tool for human parasitic infections. Trends Parasitol 32(5):378–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ricciardi A, Ndao M (2014) Diagnosis of parasitic infections: what’s going on? J Biomol Screen 20(1):6–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peeling RW, Mabey D (2010) Point-of-care tests for diagnosing infections in the developing world. Clin Microbiol Infect 16(8):1062–1069

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Banoo S, Bell D, Bossuyt P, Herring A, Mabey D, Poole F, Smith PG, Sriram N, Wongsrichanalai C, Linke R, O'Brien R, Perkins M, Cunningham J, Matsoso P, Nathanson CM, Olliaro P, Peeling RW, Ramsay A (2006) Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:S21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dard C, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Pelloux H (2016) Relevance of and new developments in serology for toxoplasmosis. Trends Parasitol 32(6):492–506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Holford TR, Davis F, Higson SP (2012) Recent trends in antibody based sensors. Biosens Bioelectron 34(1):12–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meng K, Sun W, Zhao P, Zhang L, Cai D, Cheng Z, Guo H, Liu J, Yang D, Wang S, Chai T (2014) Development of colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic assay for rapid detection of Mycoplasma suis in porcine plasma. Biosens Bioelectron 55:396–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakayama T, Zhao J, Takeuchi D, Kerdsin A, Chiranairadul P, Areeratana P, Loetthong P, Pienpringam A, Akeda Y, Oishi K (2014) Colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic strip test compromising optimised combinations of anti-S. suis capsular polysaccharide polyclonal antibodies for detection of Streptococcus suis. Biosens Bioelectron 60:175–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng D, Hu S, Hua Y, Xiao Y, Li Z, Wang X, Bi D (2007) Comparison of a new gold-immunochromatographic assay for the detection of antibodies against avian influenza virus with hemagglutination inhibition and agar gel immunodiffusion assays. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 117(1):17–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Begeman IJ, Lykins J, Zhou Y, Lai BS, Levigne P, El Bissati K, Boyer K, Withers S, Clouser F, Noble AG, Rabiah P, Swisher CN, Heydemann PT, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Montoya JG, Maldonado Y, Ramirez R, Press C, Stillwaggon E, Peyron F, McLeod R (2017) Point-of-care testing for Toxoplasma gondii IgG/IgM using Toxoplasma ICT IgG-IgM test with sera from the United States and implications for developing countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(6):e0005670

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gomez CA, Budvytyte LN, Press C, Zhou L, McLeod R, Maldonado Y, Montoya JG, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG (2018) Evaluation of three point-of-care tests for detection of toxoplasma immunoglobulin IgG and IgM in the United States: proof of concept and challenges. Open Forum Infect Dis 5(10):ofy215

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Song KJ, Yang Z, Chong CK, Kim JS, Lee KC, Kim TS, Nam HW (2013) A rapid diagnostic test for toxoplasmosis using recombinant antigenic N-terminal half of SAG1 linked with intrinsically unstructured domain of gra2 protein. Korean J Parasitol 51(5):503–510

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang X, Xuan X, Hirata H, Yokoyama N, Xu L, Suzuki N, Igarashi I (2004) Rapid immunochromatographic test using recombinant SAG2 for detection of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in cats. J Clin Microbiol 42(1):351–353

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang Y-H, Li X-R, Wang G-X, Yin H, Cai X-P, Fu B-Q, Zhang D-L (2011) Development of an immunochromatographic strip for the rapid detection of Toxoplasma gondii circulating antigens. Parasitol Int 60(1):105–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Luo J, Sun H, Zhao X, Wang S, Zhuo X, Yang Y, Chen X, Yao C, Du A (2018) Development of an immunochromatographic test based on monoclonal antibodies against surface antigen 3 (TgSAG3) for rapid detection of Toxoplasma gondii. Vet Parasitol 252:52–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chong CK, Jeong W, Kim HY, An DJ, Jeoung HY, Ryu JE, Ko AR, Kim YJ, Hong SJ, Yang Z, Nam HW (2011) Development and clinical evaluation of a rapid serodiagnostic test for toxoplasmosis of cats using recombinant SAG1 antigen. Korean J Parasitol 49(3):207–212

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chapey E, Wallon M, Peyron F (2017) Evaluation of the LDBIO point of care test for the combined detection of toxoplasmic IgG and IgM. Clin Chim Acta 464:200–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mahinc C, Flori P, Delaunay E, Guillerme C, Charaoui S, Raberin H, Hafid J, L'Ollivier C (2017) Evaluation of a new immunochromatography technology test (LDBio Diagnostics) to detect Toxoplasma IgG and IgM: comparison with the routine architect technique. J Clin Microbiol 55(12):3395–3404

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Pietkiewicz H, Hiszczyńska-Sawicka E, Kur J, Petersen E, Nielsen HV, Stankiewicz M, Andrzejewska I, Myjak P (2004) Usefulness of Toxoplasma gondii-specific recombinant antigens in serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol 42(4):1779–1781

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Abdelbaset AE, Alhasan H, Salman D, Karram MH, Ellah Rushdi MA, Xuenan X, Igarashi M (2017) Evaluation of recombinant antigens in combination and single formula for diagnosis of feline toxoplasmosis. Exp Parasitol 172:1–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kotresha D, Noordin R (2010) Recombinant proteins in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. APMIS 118(8):529–542

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Holec-Gąsior L (2013) Toxoplasma gondii recombinant antigens as tools for serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis – the current status of studies. Clin Vaccine Immunol

  47. Mirzadeh A, Saadatnia G, Golkar M, Babaie J, Noordin R (2017) Production of refolded Toxoplasma gondii recombinant SAG1-related sequence 3 (SRS3) and its use for serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. Protein Expr Purif 133:66–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Grzybowski MM, Gatkowska JM, Dziadek B, Dzitko K, Długońska H (2015) Human toxoplasmosis: a comparative evaluation of the diagnostic potential of recombinant Toxoplasma gondii ROP5 and ROP18 antigens. J Med Microbiol 64(10):1201–1207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mercier C, Delauw M-F, Pelloux H, Fricker-Hidalgo H (2017) Recombinant GRA antigens and the use of same for early diagnosis of toxoplasmosis U.S. Patent 9:658-227

  50. Béla SR, Oliveira Silva DA, Cunha-Júnior JP, Pirovani CP, Chaves-Borges FA, Reis de Carvalho F, Carrijo de Oliveira T, Mineo JR (2008) Use of SAG2A recombinant Toxoplasma gondii surface antigen as a diagnostic marker for human acute toxoplasmosis: analysis of titers and avidity of IgG and IgG1 antibodies. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 62(3):245–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim YH, Lee J, Ahn S, Kim TS, Hong SJ, Chong CK, Ahn HJ, Nam HW (2017) High seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis detected by RDT among the residents of Seokmo-do (Island) in Ganghwa-Gun, Incheon City, Korea. Korean J Parasitol 55(1):9–13

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Terkawi MA, Kameyama K, Rasul NH, Xuan X, Nishikawa Y (2013) Development of an immunochromatographic assay based on dense granule protein 7 for serological detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol 20(4):596–601

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Morovati H, Seyyed Tabaei SJ, Gholamzad M, Omidfar K, Ahmadi A, Arab Mazar Z, Eshaghi A, Sheikhsofla F (2019) Development of a lateral flow immunoassay using recombinant dense granular antigen (GRA) 7 to detect anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies. Arch Razi Inst 74(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jiang W, Liu Y, Chen Y, Yang Q, Chun P, Yao K, Han X, Wang S, Yu S, Liu Y, Wang Q (2015) A novel dynamic flow immunochromatographic test (DFICT) using gold nanoparticles for the serological detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in dogs and cats. Biosens Bioelectron 72:133–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Shen C, Cheng A, Wang M, Sun K, Jia R, Sun T, Zhang N, Zhu D, Luo Q, Zhou Y, Chen X (2010) Development and evaluation of an immunochromatographic strip test based on the recombinant UL51 protein for detecting antibody against duck enteritis virus. Virol J 7(1):268

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Liu E, Eisenbarth GS (2007) Accepting clocks that tell time poorly: fluid-phase versus standard ELISA autoantibody assays. Clin Immunol 125(2):120–126

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Burbelo PD, Ching KH, Bush ER, Han BL, Iadarola MJ (2010) Antibody-profiling technologies for studying humoral responses to infectious agents. Expert Rev Vaccines 9(6):567–578

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Burbelo PD, Ching KH, Bren KE, Iadarola MJ (2011) Searching for biomarkers: humoral response profiling with luciferase immunoprecipitation systems. Expert Rev Proteomics 8(3):309–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Burbelo PD, Lebovitz EE, Notkins AL (2015) Luciferase immunoprecipitation systems for measuring antibodies in autoimmune and infectious diseases. Transl Res 165(2):325–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Burbelo PD, Gunti S, Keller JM, Morse CG, Deeks SG, Lionakis MS, Kapoor A, Li Q, Cohen JI, Notkins AL, Alevizos I (2017) Ultrarapid measurement of diagnostic antibodies by magnetic capture of immune complexes. Sci Rep 7(1):3818

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Burbelo PD, Kovacs JA, Ching KH, Issa AT, Iadarola MJ, Murphy AA, Schlaak JF, Masur H, Polis MA, Kottilil S (2010) Proteome-wide anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) and anti-HIV antibody profiling for predicting and monitoring the response to HCV therapy in HIV-coinfected patients. J Infect Dis 202(6):894–898

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Burbelo PD, Issa AT, Ching KH, Cohen JI, Iadarola MJ, Marques A (2010) Rapid, simple, quantitative, and highly sensitive antibody detection for Lyme disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17(6):904–909

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Ramanathan R, Burbelo PD, Groot S, Iadarola MJ, Neva FA, Nutman TB (2008) A luciferase immunoprecipitation systems assay enhances the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. J Infect Dis 198(3):444–451

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Burbelo PD, Ramanathan R, Klion AD, Iadarola MJ, Nutman TB (2008) Rapid, novel, specific, high-throughput assay for diagnosis of Loa loa infection. J Clin Microbiol 46(7):2298–2304

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Burbelo PD, Leahy HP, Iadarola MJ, Nutman TB (2009) A four-antigen mixture for rapid assessment of Onchocerca volvulus infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3(5):e438

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Aye KM, Nagayasu E, Baba M, Yoshida A, Takashima Y, Maruyama H (2018) Evaluation of LIPS (luciferase immunoprecipitation system) for serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis. J Immunol Methods 462:91–100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Prakrankamanant P (2014) Quartz crystal microbalance biosensors: prospects for point-of-care diagnostics. J Med Assoc Thail 97(Suppl 4):S56–S64

    Google Scholar 

  68. Luppa PB, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW (2001) Immunosensors--principles and applications to clinical chemistry. Clin Chim Acta 314(1–2):1–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Syedmoradi L, Daneshpour M, Alvandipour M, Gomez FA, Hajghassem H, Omidfar K (2017) Point of care testing: the impact of nanotechnology. Biosens Bioelectron 87:373–387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Gervais L, Delamarche E (2009) Toward one-step point-of-care immunodiagnostics using capillary-driven microfluidics and PDMS substrates. Lab Chip 9(23):3330–3337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bertoncello P, Forster RJ (2009) Nanostructured materials for electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based detection methods: recent advances and future perspectives. Biosens Bioelectron 24(11):3191–3200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Miyazaki CM, Shimizu FM, Ferreira M (2017) 6 - Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for sensors and biosensors. In: Da Róz AL, Ferreira M, de Lima Leite F, Oliveira ON (eds) Nanocharacterization Techniques. William Andrew Publishing, pp 183–200 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-49778-7.00006-0

    Google Scholar 

  73. Tabakman SM, Lau L, Robinson JT, Price J, Sherlock SP, Wang H, Zhang B, Chen Z, Tangsombatvisit S, Jarrell JA, Utz PJ, Dai H (2011) Plasmonic substrates for multiplexed protein microarrays with femtomolar sensitivity and broad dynamic range. Nat Commun 2:466

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Li X, Pomares C, Gonfrier G, Koh B, Zhu S, Gong M, Montoya JG, Dai H (2016) Multiplexed anti-toxoplasma IgG, IgM, and IgA assay on plasmonic gold chips: towards making mass screening possible with dye test precision. J Clin Microbiol 54(7):1726–1733

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Prusa AR, Hayde M, Unterasinger L, Pollak A, Herkner KR, Kasper DC (2010) Evaluation of the Roche Elecsys Toxo IgG and IgM electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for the detection of gestational toxoplasma infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 68(4):352–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gay-Andrieu F, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Sickinger E, Espern A, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Braun HB, Pelloux H (2009) Comparative evaluation of the ARCHITECT Toxo IgG, IgM, and IgG avidity assays for anti-Toxoplasma antibodies detection in pregnant women sera. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 65(3):279–287

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Pomares C, Zhang B, Arulkumar S, Gonfrier G, Marty P, Zhao S, Cheng S, Tang M, Dai H, Montoya JG (2017) Validation of IgG, IgM multiplex plasmonic gold platform in French clinical cohorts for the serodiagnosis and follow-up of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 87(3):213–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Kim J (2012) Joining plasmonics with microfluidics: from convenience to inevitability. Lab Chip 12(19):3611–3623

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Gao H, Yang J-C, Lin JY, Stuparu AD, Lee MH, Mrksich M, Odom TW (2010) Using the angle-dependent resonances of molded plasmonic crystals to improve the sensitivities of biosensors. Nano Lett 10(7):2549–2554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Fan M, Thompson M, Andrade ML, Brolo AG (2010) Silver nanoparticles on a plastic platform for localized surface plasmon resonance biosensing. Anal Chem 82(15):6350–6352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Li Z, Xu Y, Fang W, Tong L, Zhang L (2015) Ultra-sensitive nanofiber fluorescence detection in a microfluidic chip. Sensors 15(3):4890

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Ahmed HM, Ebeid WB (2015) The use of laser-induced fluorescence or ultraviolet detectors for sensitive and selective analysis of tobramycin or erythropoietin in complex samples. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 143:12–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Novak L, Neuzil P, Pipper J, Zhang Y, Lee S (2007) An integrated fluorescence detection system for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab Chip 7(1):27–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Berner M, Hilbig U, Schubert MB, Gauglitz G (2017) Laser-induced fluorescence detection platform for point-of-care testing. Meas Sci Technol 28(8):085701

    Google Scholar 

  85. Berrettoni C, Berneschi S, Bernini R, Giannetti A, Grimaldi IA, Persichetti G, Testa G, Tombelli S, Trono C, Baldini F (2014) Optical monitoring of therapeutic drugs with a novel fluorescence- based POCT device. Procedia Eng 87:392–395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Chen P, Pan D, Mao Z (2014) Development of a portable laser-induced fluorescence system used for in situ measurements of dissolved organic matter. Opt Laser Technol 64:213–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Medawar-Aguilar V, Jofre CF, Fernández-Baldo MA, Alonso A, Angel S, Raba J, Pereira SV, Messina GA (2019) Serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis disease using a fluorescent immunosensor with chitosan-ZnO-nanoparticles. Anal Biochem 564-565:116–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Pereira AT, Novo P, Prazeres DMF, Chu V, Conde JP (2011) Heterogeneous immunoassays in microfluidic format using fluorescence detection with integrated amorphous silicon photodiodes. Biomicrofluidics 5(1):014102

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Irawan R, Tjin SC, Fang X, Fu CY (2007) Integration of optical fiber light guide, fluorescence detection system, and multichannel disposable microfluidic chip. Biomed Microdevices 9(3):413–419

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Zhuo Z, Yu Y, Wang M, Li J, Zhang Z, Liu J, Wu X, Lu A, Zhang G, Zhang B (2017) Recent advances in SELEX technology and aptamer applications in biomedicine. Int J Mol Sci 18(10)

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Ilgu M, Fazlioglu R, Ozturk M, Ozsurekci Y, Nilsen-Hamilton M (2019) Aptamers for diagnostics with applications for infectious diseases

  92. Luo Y, Liu X, Jiang T, Liao P, Fu W (2013) Dual-aptamer-based biosensing of Toxoplasma antibody. Anal Chem 85(17):8354–8360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Skládal P (2016) Piezoelectric biosensors. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 79:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  94. Wang H, Lei C, Li J, Wu Z, Shen G, Yu R (2004) A piezoelectric immunoagglutination assay for Toxoplasma gondii antibodies using gold nanoparticles. Biosens Bioelectron 19(7):701–709

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Xie Y, Chen A, Du D, Lin Y (2011) Graphene-based immunosensor for electrochemical quantification of phosphorylated p53 (S15). Anal Chim Acta 699(1):44–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Huang K-J, Li J, Liu Y-M, Cao X, Yu S, Yu M (2012) Disposable immunoassay for hepatitis B surface antigen based on a graphene paste electrode functionalized with gold nanoparticles and a Nafion-cysteine conjugate. Microchim Acta 177(3):419–426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Hahn Y-B, Ahmad R, Tripathy N (2012) Chemical and biological sensors based on metal oxide nanostructures. Chem Commun 48(84):10369–10385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Tamer U, Cetin D, Suludere Z, Boyaci IH, Temiz HT, Yegenoglu H, Daniel P, Dincer I, Elerman Y (2013) Gold-coated iron composite nanospheres targeted the detection of Escherichia coli. Int J Mol Sci 14(3):6223–6240

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Jiang S, Hua E, Liang M, Liu B, Xie G (2013) A novel immunosensor for detecting Toxoplasma gondii-specific IgM based on goldmag nanoparticles and graphene sheets. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 101:481–486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Costa MESM, Oliveira CBS, Andrade JMA, Medeiros TA, VFA N, Lanza DCF (2016) An alternative nested-PCR assay for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii strains based on GRA7 gene sequences. Acta Trop 159:120–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Robert-Gangneux F, Dardé M-L (2012) Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for toxoplasmosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 25(2):264–296

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Lin M-H, Chen T-C, T-t K, Tseng C-C, Tseng C-P (2000) Real-time PCR for quantitative detection of Toxoplasma gondii. J Clin Microbiol 38(11):4121–4125

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Simon A, Labalette P, Ordinaire I, Fréalle E, Dei-Cas E, Camus D, Delhaes L (2004) Use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes to evaluate quantitative real-time PCR for diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol 42(8):3681–3685

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Bin Dajem SM, Almushait MA (2012) Detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA by PCR in blood samples collected from pregnant Saudi women from the Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 32(5):507–512

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Homan WL, Vercammen M, De Braekeleer J, Verschueren H (2000) Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR1Note: nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper have been submitted to GenBankTM database with the accession number AF146527 (Toxoplasma gondii genomic repetitive 529 bp fragment).1. Int J Parasitol 30(1):69–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Edvinsson B, Lappalainen M, Evengard B, Toxoplasmosis ESGf (2006) Real-time PCR targeting a 529-bp repeat element for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 12(2):131–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Wahab T, Edvinsson B, Palm D, Lindh J (2010) Comparison of the AF146527 and B1 repeated elements, two real-time PCR targets used for detection of Toxoplasma gondii. J Clin Microbiol 48(2):591–592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Coppens I, Dunn JD, Romano JD, Pypaert M, Zhang H, Boothroyd JC, Joiner KA (2006) Toxoplasma gondii sequesters lysosomes from mammalian hosts in the vacuolar space. Cell 125(2):261–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28(12):E63

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. X-m S, Y-s J, X-y L, Xiang M, He G, Xie L, J-x S, Suo X (2017) Improvement and evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in human blood samples. PLoS One 12(1):e0169125

    Google Scholar 

  111. Lau YL, Meganathan P, Sonaimuthu P, Thiruvengadam G, Nissapatorn V, Chen Y (2010) Specific, sensitive, and rapid diagnosis of active toxoplasmosis by a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method using blood samples from patients. J Clin Microbiol 48(10):3698–3702

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Varlet-Marie E, Sterkers Y, Perrotte M, Bastien P (2018) A new LAMP-based assay for the molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis: comparison with a proficient PCR assay. Int J Parasitol 48(6):457–462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. El Aal AAA, Nahnoush RK, Elmallawany MA, El-Sherbiny WS, Badr MS, Nasr GM (2018) Isothermal PCR for feasible molecular diagnosis of primary toxoplasmosis in women recently experienced spontaneous abortion. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 6(6):982–987

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Yazar S, Yaman O, Eser B, Altuntas F, Kurnaz F, Sahin I (2004) Investigation of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in patients with neoplasia. J Med Microbiol 53(Pt 12):1183–1186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Fallahi S, Seyyed Tabaei SJ, Pournia Y, Zebardast N, Kazemi B (2014) Comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and nested-PCR assay targeting the RE and B1 gene for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in blood samples of children with leukaemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 79(3):347–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Honsvall BK, Robertson LJ (2017) From research lab to standard environmental analysis tool: will NASBA make the leap? Water Res 109:389–397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Noruzi R, Dalimi A, Forouzandeh M, Ghaffarifar F (2012) Identification of live Toxoplasma gondii by the NASBA method in rat. Pathobiol Res 15(1):73–80

    Google Scholar 

  118. Norouzi R, Dalimi A, Forozandeh Moghadam M, Ghaffarifar F (2016) Comparison of a nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR methods for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in rat blood samples. J Zoonotic Dis 1(1):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  119. Bhattacharyya A, Klapperich CM (2007) Design and testing of a disposable microfluidic chemiluminescent immunoassay for disease biomarkers in human serum samples. Biomed Microdevices 9(2):245–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Koczula KM, Gallotta A (2016) Lateral flow assays. Essays Biochem 60(1):111–120

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Posthuma-Trumpie GA, Korf J, van Amerongen A (2009) Lateral flow (immuno)assay: its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. A literature survey. Anal Bioanal Chem 393(2):569–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Hajissa K, Zakaria R, Suppian R, Mohamed Z (2017) An evaluation of a recombinant multiepitope based antigen for detection of Toxoplasma gondii specific antibodies. BMC Infect Dis 17(1):807

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Dai JF, Jiang M, Qu LL, Sun L, Wang YY, Gong LL, Gong RJ, Si J (2013) Toxoplasma gondii: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on a recombinant multi-epitope peptide for distinguishing recent from past infection in human sera. Exp Parasitol 133(1):95–100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Drapała D, Holec-Gąsior L, Kur J (2015) New recombinant chimeric antigens, P35-MAG1, MIC1-ROP1, and MAG1-ROP1, for the serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 82(1):34–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Beghetto E, Spadoni A, Bruno L, Buffolano W, Gargano N (2006) Chimeric antigens of Toxoplasma gondii: toward standardization of toxoplasmosis serodiagnosis using recombinant products. J Clin Microbiol 44(6):2133–2140

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Holec-Gasior L, Ferra B, Drapala D (2012) MIC1-MAG1-SAG1 chimeric protein, a most effective antigen for detection of human toxoplasmosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19(12):1977–1979

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Holec-Gąsior L, Ferra B, Drapała D, Lautenbach D, Kur J (2012) A new MIC1-MAG1 recombinant chimeric antigen can be used instead of the Toxoplasma gondii lysate antigen in serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19(1):57–63

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Kaittanis C, Santra S, Perez JM (2010) Emerging nanotechnology-based strategies for the identification of microbial pathogenesis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62(4–5):408–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Duchesne L, Lacombe K (2018) Innovative technologies for point-of-care testing of viral hepatitis in low-resource and decentralized settings. J Viral Hepat 25(2):108–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Maffert P, Reverchon S, Nasser W, Rozand C, Abaibou H (2017) New nucleic acid testing devices to diagnose infectious diseases in resource-limited settings. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36(10):1717–1731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Sia SK, Kricka LJ (2008) Microfluidics and point-of-care testing. Lab Chip 8(12):1982–1983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Universiti Sains Malaysia and Malaysian Ministry of Education [Higher Institution Centre of Excellence Program (HICoE), No. 311/CIPPM/4401005] for the support of the first author.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally in writing, reading, and approving the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahmah Noordin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A.H., Noordin, R. Serological and molecular rapid diagnostic tests for Toxoplasma infection in humans and animals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39, 19–30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03680-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03680-2

Keywords

  • Toxoplasma infection
  • Toxoplasma gondii
  • Rapid diagnostic tests
  • Immunoassay
  • Molecular diagnostics
  • Point-of-care test