Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and validation of external quality assessment panels for mycobacterial culture testing to diagnose tuberculosis in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mycobacterial culture remains the gold standard for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in clinical samples. However, no external quality assessment (EQA) tools exist to validate results obtained using this sophisticated method. Therefore, we developed EQA panels to assess the quality of mycobacterial culture results produced by designated TB hospitals in China. Artificial sputum containing methylcellulose was used to supplement quantified mycobacterial solutions to simulate culture-negative and culture-positive clinical sputum samples of low or high mycobacterial concentration, respectively. After storage of the quantified simulated EQA panels for 4 weeks at 4 °C, experimental bacterial quantification of the panels was again conducted, with no impact of artificial sputum on mycobacterial culture results observed. Next, 47 tuberculosis (TB) hospitals were recruited for evaluation of the EQA panels. Overall, 29 hospitals (61.7%) produced mycobacterial culture test results matching expected results for the EQA panels, while the remaining 18 (38.3%) hospitals did not. False-negative results for the low mycobacterial concentration panel sample accounted for 33 (73.3%) diagnostic errors. Compared with hospitals using solid culture methods as a control group, hospitals using the liquid culture method were less likely to produce uncertified results (aOR 0.064, 95% CI 0.005–0.770). In conclusion, we first developed then evaluated EQA panels for validation of mycobacterial culture testing in China. Our data demonstrate that approximately one-third of TB hospitals failed to produce results that met criteria for classification as certified mycobacterial culture testing providers, emphasizing the importance of quality control and quality assurance in TB diagnostics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2018. 2018

  2. Lonnroth K, Migliori GB, Abubakar I, D’Ambrosio L, de Vries G, Diel R, Douglas P, Falzon D, Gaudreau MA, Goletti D, Gonzalez Ochoa ER, Lo Bue P, Matteelli A, Njoo H, Solovic I, Story A, Tayeb T, van der Werf MJ, Weil D, Zellweger JP, Abdel Aziz M, Al Lawati MR, Aliberti S, Arrazola de Onate W, Barreira D, Bhatia V, Blasi F, Bloom A, Bruchfeld J, Castelli F, Centis R, Chemtob D, Cirillo DM, Colorado A, Dadu A, Dahle UR, De Paoli L, Dias HM, Duarte R, Fattorini L, Gaga M, Getahun H, Glaziou P, Goguadze L, Del Granado M, Haas W, Jarvinen A, Kwon GY, Mosca D, Nahid P, Nishikiori N, Noguer I, O'Donnell J, Pace-Asciak A, Pompa MG, Popescu GG, Robalo Cordeiro C, Ronning K, Ruhwald M, Sculier JP, Simunovic A, Smith-Palmer A, Sotgiu G, Sulis G, Torres-Duque CA, Umeki K, Uplekar M, van Weezenbeek C, Vasankari T, Vitillo RJ, Voniatis C, Wanlin M, Raviglione MC (2015) Towards tuberculosis elimination: an action framework for low-incidence countries. Eur Respir J 45(4):928–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Falzon D, Mirzayev F, Wares F, Baena IG, Zignol M, Linh N, Weyer K, Jaramillo E, Floyd K, Raviglione M (2015) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis around the world: what progress has been made? Eur Respir J 45(1):150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Walzl G, McNerney R, du Plessis N, Bates M, McHugh TD, Chegou NN, Zumla A (2018) Tuberculosis: advances and challenges in development of new diagnostics and biomarkers. Lancet Infect Dis 18(7):e199–e210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rageade F, Picot N, Blanc-Michaud A, Chatellier S, Mirande C, Fortin E, van Belkum A (2014) Performance of solid and liquid culture media for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical materials: meta-analysis of recent studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33(6):867–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schon T, Miotto P, Koser CU, Viveiros M, Bottger E, Cambau E (2017) Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug-resistance testing: challenges, recent developments and perspectives. Clin Microbiol Infect 23(3):154–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seki M, Kim CK, Hayakawa S, Mitarai S (2018) Recent advances in tuberculosis diagnostics in resource-limited settings. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37(8):1405–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott L, Albert H, Gilpin C, Alexander H, DeGruy K, Stevens W (2014) Multicenter feasibility study to assess external quality assessment panels for Xpert MTB/RIF assay in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol 52(7):2493–2499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mekonen A, Ayele Y, Berhan Y, Woldeyohannes D, Erku W, Sisay S (2018) Factors which contributed for low quality sputum smears for the detection of acid fast bacilli (AFB) at selected health centers in Ethiopia: a quality control perspective. PLoS One 13(6):e0198947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bai GH, Kim SJ, Chang CL (2007) Proficiency analysis of drug susceptibility testing by national-level tuberculosis reference laboratories from 1995 to 2003. J Clin Microbiol 45(11):3626–3630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laszlo A, Rahman M, Raviglione M, Bustreo F (1997) Quality assurance programme for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the WHO/IUATLD Supranational Laboratory Network: first round of proficiency testing. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1(3):231–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang L, Zhang H, Ruan Y, Chin DP, Xia Y, Cheng S, Chen M, Zhao Y, Jiang S, Du X, He G, Li J, Wang S, Chen W, Xu C, Huang F, Liu X, Wang Y (2014) Tuberculosis prevalence in China, 1990-2010; a longitudinal analysis of national survey data. Lancet 383(9934):2057–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pang Y, Du J, Qin ZZ, Greenwald Z, Liu Y, Mi F, Zhao Y, Li L (2016) An overview on tuberculosis-specific hospitals in China in 2009: results of a national survey. Eur Respir J 47(5):1584–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamada H, Mitarai S, Wahyunitisari MR, Mertaniasih NM, Sugamoto T, Chikamatsu K, Aono A, Matsumoto H, Fujiki A (2011) Improved polyacrylamide-based artificial sputum with formalin-fixed tubercle bacilli for training of tuberculosis microscopists. J Clin Microbiol 49(10):3604–3609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Woods GL, Ridderhof JC (1996) Quality assurance in the mycobacteriology laboratory. Quality control, quality improvement, and proficiency testing. Clin Lab Med 16(3):657–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolinsky E (1994) Conventional diagnostic methods for tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 19(3):396–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JJ, Suo J, Lin CB, Wang JD, Lin TY, Tsai YC (2003) Comparative evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system with solid medium for isolation of mycobacteria. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 7(6):569–574

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfyffer GE, Cieslak C, Welscher HM, Kissling P, Rusch-Gerdes S (1997) Rapid detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens by using the automated BACTEC 9000 MB system and comparison with radiometric and solid-culture systems. J Clin Microbiol 35(9):2229–2234

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB in adults and children policy update 2018. 2018

  20. World Health Organization. (2016). The use of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (TB-LAMP) for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: policy guidance.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the staffs participating in this study in the tuberculosis hospitals.

Support statement

This study was funded by the Foundation from the Innovation Alliance on Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Treatment (Beijing).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J. Du, Y. Wang, L. Li, and Y. Pang participated in the development of external quality control panels. W. Shu, Y. Liu, Y. Zhan, K. Yu, J. Gao, L. Liang, and Y. Pang analyzed and interpreted the data. Y. Pang and L. Li wrote the first draft of this report. All authors gave input to the final version. Y. Pang and L. Li had the final responsibility for the decision to submit the study for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liang Li or Yu Pang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Main point

We first developed then evaluated EQA panels for validation of mycobacterial culture testing in China. Approximately one-third of TB hospitals failed to produce results that met criteria for classification as certified mycobacterial culture testing providers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, J., Shu, W., Liu, Y. et al. Development and validation of external quality assessment panels for mycobacterial culture testing to diagnose tuberculosis in China. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 38, 1961–1968 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03634-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03634-8

Keywords

Navigation