Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increased overall survival after introduction of structured bedside consultation in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is a common and severe disease. In 2012, a structured bedside consultation (SBC) was introduced at Rijnstate Hospital. We analysed the effect of this SBC on the overall survival of patients with SAB and the effect on the diagnostic workup. We performed a retrospective cohort study, including all patients over 18 years with SAB from 2009 until 2017. The cases preceding versus those after implementation of SBC in 2012 were compared. In total, 613 episodes of SAB were analysed: 234 cases before and 379 cases since SBC. In 484 patients at risk for a complicated course, there was no significant difference in the 30-day survival (77 versus 82%, p = 0.18); however, an increase in 365-day survival was seen (56 versus 64%, p = 0.05). Overall, more patients received adequate therapy, both in the first 2 weeks (67.8 versus 86.7%, p < 0.001), as in complicated SAB (70.5 versus 93.2%, p < 0.001). In 21% of patients with transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) following a negative or inconclusive TTE, endocarditis was diagnosed. In patients at risk for complicated SAB, the PET scan revealed a metastatic infection which was not clinically suspected in 65% of positive PET scans. Structured bedside consultation is associated with a better 365-day survival in patients at risk for complicated SAB. Moreover, the additional value of TEE and the PET scan was shown. We strongly advise compliance to SBC in all patients at risk for complicated SAB and the use of both TEE and PET scans in these patients. Even in uncomplicated SAB, TEE or PET scan can reveal metastatic infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paulsen J, Solligard E, Damas JK, DeWan A, Asvold BO, Bracken MB (2016) The impact of infectious disease specialist consultation for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a systematic review. Open Forum Infect Dis 3(2):ofw048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bai AD, Showler A, Burry L, Steinberg M, Ricciuto DR, Fernandes T et al (2015) Impact of infectious disease consultation on quality of care, mortality, and length of stay in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: results from a large multicenter cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 60(10):1451–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkins TC, Price CS, Sabel AL, Mehler PS, Burman WJ (2008) Impact of routine infectious diseases service consultation on the evaluation, management, and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 46(7):1000–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogel M et al (2016) Infectious disease consultation for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Inf Secur 72(1):19–28

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schuts EC et al (2016) Current evidence on hospital antimicrobial stewardship objectives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 16(7):847–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O’Grady NP et al (2009) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 49(1):1–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Landman GW, Bouwhuis JW, Bloembergen P, van der Meer JT, Groeneveld PH (2011) Evaluation of diagnosis and therapy of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: recommended minimum treatment duration of 2 weeks not always met. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 155(38):A3376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saunderson RB, Gouliouris T, Nickerson EK, Cartwright EJ, Kidney A, Aliyu SH et al (2015) Impact of routine bedside infectious disease consultation on clinical management and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in adults. Clin Microbiol Infect 21(8):779–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lesens O, Methlin C, Hansmann Y, Remy V, Martinot M, Bergin C et al (2003) Role of comorbidity in mortality related to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a prospective study using the Charlson weighted index of comorbidity. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24(12):890–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang FY, Peacock JE Jr, Musher DM, Triplett P, MacDonald BB, Mylotte JM et al (2003) Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: recurrence and the impact of antibiotic treatment in a prospective multicenter study. Medicine 82(5):333–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holland TL, Arnold C, Fowler VG (2014) Clinical Management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. JAMA 312(13):1330–1341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundberg J, Nettleman MD, Costigan M, Bentler S, Dawson J, Wenzel RP (1998) Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: the cost-effectiveness of long-term therapy associated with infectious diseases consultation. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 6(1):9–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandez Guerrero ML, Alvarez B, Manzarbeitia F, Renedo G (2012) Infective endocarditis at autopsy: a review of pathology manifestations and clinical correlates. Medicine 91(3):152–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Department of Microbiology and Immunology for selecting the patients for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth H. Gisolf.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee of Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem. Informed consent was not required for this retrospective study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Structured bedside consultation in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia results in more adequate diagnostic and therapeutic policy and improvement of 365-day overall survival. Use of both transoesophageal echocardiography and PET scans has an additional value.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ariaans, M.B.P.A., Roovers, E.A., Claassen, M.A.A. et al. Increased overall survival after introduction of structured bedside consultation in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37, 1187–1193 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3239-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3239-1

Keywords

Navigation