Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A review and new insights to antimicrobial action of local anesthetics

  • Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local anesthetics (LAs) are medications which can provide analgesia in distinct body regions through the blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. Besides pain management, the supplemental role of LAs as antimicrobial agents has been documented in several studies. Different databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science with the name of different local anesthetics and related names for antimicrobial keywords were searched without time limitation. This review summarized different in vitro and in vivo studies regarding antimicrobial effects of different LAs with focuses on antimicrobial applications of most studied LAs, interaction with different agents which combined with LAs, and mechanisms of action and structural dependence of LAs antibacterial effects. Among different LAs, lidocaine is the most studied preparation. Reduction of the incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection, prophylaxis for surgical wound infections, prevention of the incidence of catheter-associated infections, oral biofilm reduction on the buccal mucosa, and prevention against bacteria that produced nosocomial infection are some examples of lidocaine antimicrobial application. Studies showed that different factors including structure, concentration, duration of exposure, type of microorganism tested, and temperature affect the degree of LA antimicrobial activity. In addition, various agents such as antibiotics, preservatives, opioids, epinephrine, and propofol can combine with LAs and affect their antimicrobial properties through synergistic or antagonistic action. Due to antibacterial activities, LAs could be applied in a clinic for prophylaxis of surgical site infection. In the application of LAs prior to diagnostic procedures caution should be needed; otherwise, when culturing the specimen, they could lead to false negative results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becker DE, Reed KL (2012) Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog 59:90–102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson SM, Saint John BE, Dine AP (2008) Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review. Surg Infect 9:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Olsen KM, Peddicord TE, Campbell GD et al (2000) Antimicrobial effects of lidocaine in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother 45:217–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stratford AF, Zoutman DE, Davidson JS (2002) Effect of lidocaine and epinephrine on Staphylococcus aureus in a guinea pig model of surgical wound infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1275–1279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tustin A, Kim SJ, Chomsky A et al (2014) Antibacterial properties of 2% lidocaine and reduced rate of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection. Retina 34:935–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu CW, Lin TY, Shieh JS et al (2014) Antimicrobial effect of continuous lidocaine infusion in a Staphylococcus aureus-induced wound infection in a mouse model. Ann Plast Surg 73:598–601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang H, Guo X, Chen X et al (2013) Study on antibacterial effect of lidocaine. Chinese J Androl 27:14–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Srisatjaluk RL, Klongnoi B, Wongsirichat N (2016) Antimicrobial effect of topical local anesthetic spray on oral microflora. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 16:17–24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Parr AM, Zoutman DE, Davidson JSD (1999) Antimicrobial activity of lidocaine against bacteria associated with nosocomial wound infection. Ann Plast Surg 43:239–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fazly Bazaz BS, Salt WG (1983) Local anaesthetics as antimicrobial agents: structure-action considerations. Microbios 37:45–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pere P, Lindgren L, Vaara M (1999) Poor antibacterial effect of ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 91:884–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakuragi T, Ishino H, Dan K (1998) Bactericidal activity of preservative-free bupivacaine on microorganisms in the human skin flora. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 42:1096–1099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenberg PH, Renkonen OV (1985) Antimicrobial activity of bupivacaine and morphine. Anesthesiology 62:178–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taki Y, Ueno H, Murota K et al (1988) Effect of temperature on antibacterial activity of lidocaine to Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol Immunol 32:429–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kose AA, Karabaggli Y, Kiremitci A et al (2010) Do local anesthetics have antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus aureus under in vivo conditions? An experimental study. Dermatol Surg 36:848–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaya K, Rota S, Doǧan B et al (2007) Comparison of the antibacterial effects of two local anesthetics: lidocaine and articaine. Turk J Med Sci 37:7–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fazly Bazaz BS, Salt WG (1983) Local anaesthetics as antibacterial agents: effects on cellular respiration and the leakage of cytoplasmic constituents. Microbios 37:139–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt RM, Rosenkranz HS (1970) Antimicrobial activity of local anesthetics: lidocaine and procaine. J Infect Dis 121:597–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ton That V, Nguyen S, Poon D et al (2010) Bioluminescent lux gene biosensors in oral streptococci: determination of complementary antimicrobial activity of minocycline hydrochloride with the anesthetic lidocaine/prilocaine or the antiseptic chlorhexidine. In Periodontitis: symptoms, treatment and prevention. Nova Science Publishers, Inc, p 141–165

  20. Miller MA, Shelley WB (1985) Antibacterial properties of lidocaine on bacteria isolated from dermal lesions. Arch Dermatol 121:1157–1159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pirbudak L, Karsligil T, Zer Y et al (2005) Antibacterial effect of bupivacaine and ropivacaine; effect of adjuvant drugs. Pain Clin 17:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Won Keun S, Hyang Joon P, You Chan K et al (2000) The antimicrobial effects of lidocaine and epinephrine. Korean J Dermatol 38:635–642

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chandan SS, Faoagali J, Wainwright CE (2005) Sensitivity of respiratory bacteria to lignocaine. Pathology 37:305–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park KK, Sharon VR (2017) A review of local anesthetics: minimizing risk and side effects in cutaneous surgery. Dermatol Surg 43:173–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung RM, Rybak MA, Milner PT et al (2017) Local anesthetics and advances in their administration – an overview. J Pre-Clin Clin Res 11:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Drasner K (2015) Local anesthetics. In: Katzung B, Trevor A (eds) Basic and clinical pharmacology, 13th edn. Mc graw Hill

  27. Kim S, Toma H, Midha N et al (2010) Antibiotic resistance of conjunctiva and nasopharynx evaluation study: a prospective study of patients undergoing intravitreal injection. Ophthalmology 117:2372–2378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Filsoufi F, Castillo J, Rahmanian P et al (2009) Epidemiology of deep sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23:488–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tabacov I, Tsatsova V (1970) The antibacterial effect of a chlorhexidine-lidocaine jelly upon the flora of the anterior male urethra. Int Urol Nephrol 2:199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gocmen J, Buyukkocak U, Caglayan O (2008) In vitro antibacterial effects of topical local anesthetics. J Dermatol Treat 19:351–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mullin G, Rubinfeld R (1997) The antibacterial activity of topical anesthetics. Cornea 16:662–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morrow ME, Berry CW (1988) Antimicrobial properties of topical anesthetic liquids containing lidocaine or benzocaine. Anesth Prog 35:9–13

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. McCarthy P, Shklar G (1980) Diseases of the oral mucosa. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 101

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sculley PD, Dunley RE (1980) Antimicrobial activity of a lidocaine preparation. Anesth Prog 27:21–23

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Aldous WK, Jensen R, Sieck BM (1998) Cocaine and lidocaine with phenylephrine as topical anesthetics: antimicrobial activity against common nasal pathogens. Ear Nose Throat J 77:554–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wimberley N, Willey S, Sullivan N et al (1979) Antibacterial properties of lidocaine. Chest 76:37–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sakuragi T, Ishino H, Dan K (1996) Bactericidal activity of clinically used local anesthetics on Staphylococcus aureus. Reg Anesth 21:239–242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Begec Z, Gulhas N, Toprak HI et al (2007) Comparison of the antibacterial activity of lidocaine 1% versus alkalinized lidocaine in vitro. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 68:242–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Feldman JM, Chapin-Robertson K, Turner J (1994) Do agents used for epidural analgesia have antimicrobial properties? Reg Anesth 19:43–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lagan G, McLure H (2004) Review of local anaesthetic agents. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 15:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Maddi R, Horrow J, Mark J et al (1990) Evaluation of a new cutaneous topical anesthesia preparation. Reg Anesth 15:109–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kerenyi M, Batai R, Juhasz V et al (2004) Lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) has antibacterial effect in vitro. J Hosp Infect 55:75–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Berg JO, Mössner BK, Skov MN et al (2006) Antibacterial properties of EMLA® and lidocaine in wound tissue biopsies for culturing. Wound Repair Regen 14:581–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Batai I, Bogar L, Juhasz V et al (2009) A comparison of the antimicrobial property of lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA®) and an alcohol-based disinfectant on intact human skin flora. Anesth Analg 108:666–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rota S, Akcabay M, Emektas G et al (1993) Antibacterial activity of bupivacaine. Gazi Tip Dergisi 4:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  46. Grimmond TR, Brownridge P (1986) Antimicrobial activity of bupivacaine and pethidine. Anaesth Intensive Care 14:418–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sakuragi T, Ishino H, Dan K (1997) Bactericidal activity of 0.5% bupivacaine with preservatives on microorganisms in the human skin flora. Reg Anesth 22:178–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Batai I, Kerenyi M, Falvai J et al (2002) Bacterial growth in ropivacaine hydrochloride. Anesth Analg 94:729–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N (2001) Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anaesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 18:687–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hodson M, Gajraj R, Scott NB (1999) A comparison of the antibacterial activity of levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine: an in vitro study with bacteria implicated in epidural infection. Anaesthesia 54:699–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pelz K, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Bogdan C et al (2008) Analysis of the antimicrobial activity of local anaesthetics used for dental analgesia. J Med Microbiol 57:88–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG, Sansonetty F et al (2000) Antifungal activity of local anesthetics against Candida species. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 8:124–137

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Rodrigues A, Pina-Vaz C, Mardh P et al (2000) Inhibition of germ tube formation by Candida albicans by local anesthetics: an effect related to ionic channel blockade. Curr Microbiol 40:145–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rodrigues AG, Araujo R, Pina-Vaz C (2006) Interaction of local anaesthetics with other antifungal agents against pathogenic aspergillus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 27:339–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Abdelaziz AA, el-Nakeeb MA (1988) Sporicidal activity of local anaesthetics and their binary combinations with preservatives. J Clin Pharm Ther 13:249–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Barza M, Ernst C, Baum J et al (1974) Effect of lidocaine on the antibacterial activity of seven antibiotics. Arch Ophthalmol 92:514–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kampe S, Poetter C, Buzello S et al (2003) Ropivacaine 0.1% with sufentanil 1 microg/mL inhibits in vitro growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and does not promote multiplication of Staphylococcus aureus. Anesth Analg 97:409–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tamanai-Shacoori Z, Shacoori V, Vo Van JM et al (2004) Sufentanil modifies the antibacterial activity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Can J Anesth 51:911–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Guillier M, Boselli E, Bouvet L et al (2007) Levobupivacaine hydrochloride and sufentanil have no antimicrobial effect at 25°C in vitro. Eur J Anaesthesiol 24:634–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gajraj RJ, Hodson MJ, Gillespie JA et al (1998) Antibacterial activity of lidocaine in mixtures with Diprivan. Br J Anaesth 81:444–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Euasobhon P, Dej-Arkom S, Siriussawakul A et al (2016) Lidocaine for reducing propofol-induced pain on induction of anaesthesia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:Cd007874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sakuragi T, Yanagisawa K, Shirai Y et al (1999) Growth of Escherichia coli in propofol, lidocaine, and mixtures of propofol and lidocaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:476–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wachowski I, Jolly DT, Hrazdil J et al (1999) The growth of microorganisms in propofol and mixtures of propofol and lidocaine. Anesth Analg 88:209–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Driver R, Granus V, Yassa Y (1998) Growth inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus by propofol/lidocaine admixture. Anesth Analg 86:166S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yagiela JA (1995) Vasoconstrictor agents for local anesthesia. Anesth Prog 42:116–120

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Curatolo M, Petersen-Felix S, Arendt-Nielsen L et al (1998) Adding sodium bicarbonate to lidocaine enhances the depth of epidural blockade. Anesth Analg 86:341–347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Snyders SP, James MFM (2008) Alkalinisation does not enhance the antimicrobial properties of local anaesthetic solutions. S Afr J Anaesth Analg 14:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  68. Begeç Z, Gülhaş N, Toprak HI et al (2007) Antibacterial effectiveness of alkalinized ropivacaine and bupivacaine. Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisi 35:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  69. Thompson KD, Welykyj S, Massa MC (1993) Antibacterial activity of lidocaine in combination with a bicarbonate buffer. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 19:216–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ohsuka S, Ohta M, Masuda K et al (1994) Lidocaine hydrochloride and acetylsalicylate kill bacteria by disrupting the bacterial membrane potential in different ways. Microbiol Immunol 38:429–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Leung Y, Rawal B (1977) Mechanism of action of tetracaine hydrochloride against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 136:679–683

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Fazly Bazaz BS, Salt W (1983) Local anaesthetics induced turbidity increases: implications of interactions with intact bacterial cells and with subcellular fractions. Microbios 36:135–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Salt W, Wiseman D (1970) The effect of magnesium ions and Tris buffer on the uptake of cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide by Escherichia coli. J Pharm Pharmacol 22:767–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lamikanara A, Allwood M (1977) Effect of polyoxyalkylphenols on the optical density of staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Bacteriol 42:387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Targeted Drug Delivery Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Bibi Marjan Razavi

  2. Department of Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Bibi Marjan Razavi

  3. Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Bibi Sedigheh Fazly Bazzaz

  4. Pharmaceutical Control Department, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Bibi Sedigheh Fazly Bazzaz

Authors
  1. Bibi Marjan Razavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bibi Sedigheh Fazly Bazzaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bibi Sedigheh Fazly Bazzaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razavi, B.M., Fazly Bazzaz, B.S. A review and new insights to antimicrobial action of local anesthetics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 38, 991–1002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-03460-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-03460-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation