Evaluation of the use of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection in a routine setting
In order to evaluate the usefulness of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large group of patients in a routine setting, we designed a 3-year retrospective study. Patients were classified into two groups: those meeting the clinical criteria of PJI and those that did not (control group). Two hundred patients and 276 samples were included. The types of infection were early (n = 44), delayed (n = 53), positive intraoperative cultures (n = 13) and late-acute (n = 8). The culture sensitivities of sonicate fluid, periprosthetic tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid were 69.5, 52.8, 54.8 and 60.2%, respectively. The specificities were 97.6, 90.3, 93.0 and 89.9%, respectively. Sonicate fluid culture of implants was more sensitive than peri-implant tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid for all infection types, though it was especially useful in delayed infection: 91.3% vs. 60.0% (p = 0.0015), 63.2% (p = 0.0005) and 66.7% (p = 0.0001), respectively. When sonicate fluid culture of implants was performed in addition to conventional cultures, the sensitivity increased significantly in total (from 60.2 to 77.1%) and delayed PJI (from 45.1 to 71.7%). On the other hand, for early PJI, sonicate fluid culture of prosthesis was not superior to conventional diagnostic methods.
We acknowledge Mr. Oliver Shaw for his help with the English edition of the article.
Part of this work was communicated at the 25th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), Copenhagen, Denmark, April 2015.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest for any of the authors regarding this study.
- 6.Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, Ramage G, Hanna D, Nixon JR, Gorman SP, Davis RI, Anderson N (1999) Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 37(10):3281–3290PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Puig-Verdié L, Alentorn-Geli E, González-Cuevas A, Sorlí L, Salvadó M, Alier A, Pelfort X, Portillo ME, Horcajada JP (2013) Implant sonication increases the diagnostic accuracy of infection in patients with delayed, but not early, orthopaedic implant failure. Bone Joint J 95-B(2):244–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Cazanave C, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Hanssen AD, Karau MJ, Schmidt SM, Gomez Urena EO, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR, Lough LE, Pritt BS, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2013) Rapid molecular microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol 51(7):2280–2287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Cofield RH, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Osmon DR, McDowell A, Patrick S, Steckelberg JM, Mandrekar JN, Fernandez Sampedro M, Patel R (2009) Microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection by use of implant sonication. J Clin Microbiol 47(6):1878–1884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR; Infectious Diseases Society of America (2013) Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56(1):e1–e25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Esteban J, Alvarez-Alvarez B, Blanco A, Fernández-Roblas R, Gadea I, Garcia-Cañete J, Sandoval E, Valdazo M (2013) Prolonged incubation time does not increase sensitivity for the diagnosis of implant-related infection using samples prepared by sonication of the implants. Bone Joint J 95-B(7):1001–1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, Crook DW, Simpson H, Peto TE, McLardy-Smith P, Berendt AR (1998) Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J Clin Microbiol 36(10):2932–2939PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 31.Benito N, Franco M, Ribera A, Soriano A, Rodriguez-Pardo D, Sorlí L, Fresco G, Fernández-Sampedro M, Dolores Del Toro M, Guío L, Sánchez-Rivas E, Bahamonde A, Riera M, Esteban J, Baraia-Etxaburu JM, Martínez-Alvarez J, Jover-Sáenz A, Dueñas C, Ramos A, Sobrino B, Euba G, Morata L, Pigrau C, Coll P, Mur I, Ariza J; REIPI (Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Disease) Group for the Study of Prosthetic Joint Infections (2016) Time trends in the aetiology of prosthetic joint infections: a multicentre cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 22(8):732.e1–732.e8CrossRefGoogle Scholar