Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of microbiology cascade reporting on antibiotic de-escalation in cefazolin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteremia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cascade reporting (CR) involves reporting the susceptibilities of broad-spectrum agents only when the organism is resistant to more narrow-spectrum agents. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of CR on antibiotic de-escalation practices and to characterize the impact of CR on clinical outcomes. CR rules were implemented in the microbiology laboratory at Atlantic Health System (AHS) in June 2013. A retrospective chart review was conducted at two community teaching hospitals in adult patients who had a blood culture positive for a Gram-negative organism susceptible to cefazolin and who were empirically treated with broad-spectrum beta-lactam (BSBL) antibiotics. De-escalation practices were compared in the pre-CR (July 2012–December 2012) and post-CR (July 2013–December 2013) periods. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients whose BSBL agent was de-escalated to agents listed on the post-CR antibiotic susceptibility report within 48 h of the final report. Secondary endpoints include the difference in pre-CR and post-CR periods in terms of hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, Clostridium difficile infections, and re-initiation of a BSBL agent within 7 days. A total of 73 patients were included; 31 in the pre-CR and 42 in the post-CR period. Patients had similar baseline characteristics. Therapy was de-escalated in 48 % of pre-CR vs 71 % of post-CR patients (p = 0.043). No significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints between patients in the pre-CR and post-CR periods. CR resulted in significant improvements in de-escalation practices without affecting safety outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS et al (2009) Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 48:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE Jr et al (2007) Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 44:159–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2014) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 24th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. CLSI, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brodowy BA, Guglielmo BJ, York MK et al (1989) Experience with selective reporting of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Am J Hosp Pharm 46:1816–1818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan TY, McNulty C, Charlett A et al (2003) Laboratory antibiotic susceptibility reporting and antibiotic prescribing in general practice. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:379–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coupat C, Pradier C, Degand N et al (2013) Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility data improves the appropriateness of intended antibiotic prescriptions in urinary tract infections: a case-vignette randomised study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32:627–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunney R, Aziz HA, Schubert D et al (2000) Interpretive reporting and selective antimicrobial susceptibility release in non-critical microbiology results. J Antimicrob Chemother 45:705–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McNulty CA, Lasseter GM, Charlett A et al (2011) Does laboratory antibiotic susceptibility reporting influence primary care prescribing in urinary tract infection and other infections? J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1396–1404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steffee CH, Morrell RM, Wasilauskas BL (1997) Clinical use of rifampicin during routine reporting of rifampicin susceptibilities: a lesson in selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility data. J Antimicrob Chemother 40:595–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Tawfiq JA, Momattin H, Al-Habboubi F et al (2015) Restrictive reporting of selected antimicrobial susceptibilities influences clinical prescribing. J Infect Public Health 8:234–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garnacho-Montero J, Gutierrez-Pizarraya A, Escoresca-Ortega et al (2014) De-escalation of empirical therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 40:32–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results of this study were presented at the 54th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. We thank Kathy Hummel, John McGuire, Nancy Miller, Anmarie Acocella, and Roberto B. Herrera Jr for their critical roles in the implementation and validation of the cascade-reporting rules, and Rami Bustami and Brian Larkin for their assistance with statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. S. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

For this type of study (retrospective) formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, L.S., Patel, D., King, E.A. et al. Impact of microbiology cascade reporting on antibiotic de-escalation in cefazolin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35, 1151–1157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2645-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2645-5

Keywords

Navigation