Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of antiseptic resistance genes increases in staphylococcal isolates from orthokeratology lens wearers over initial six-month period of use

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of antiseptic-resistance (QAC) genes in staphylococci colonizing periorbital tissues and accessories of orthokeratology (ortho-k) lens wearers over a 6-month period and determine the effect of their presence on minimum inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of disinfectants and log reduction of multipurpose contact lens solutions (MPS). Staphylococci were isolated from periorbital tissues and accessories of patients before commencing ortho-k therapy and at two subsequent visits. Presence of QAC genes in 116 S. aureus and 67 CNS isolates was determined by PCR and association with period of ortho-k use determined. MICs and MBCs of staphylococci gene-positive were compared with gene-negative strains and the effectiveness of four MPS for rigid contact lenses investigated. S. aureus carriage rates in the conjunctiva decreased significantly from 41.2 % (baseline) to 11.8 % (3-months), and 13.3 % (6-months) (p trend 0.03), while CNS increased from 58.8 %(baseline) to 94.1 % (3-months), and 93.3 % (6-months) (p trend 0.02). Prevalence of qacA/B increased considerably over time (S. aureus: 4.4 % to 15.4 %, CNS: 6.7 % to 25 %), but frequency of smr was relatively stable. Only five CNS isolates harboured qacH. MICs and MBCs of gene-positive isolates were significantly increased and three MPS did not achieve a 3-log reduction of many QAC-positive strains. Ortho-k lens wear contributed to changes of staphylococcal carriage rates in the conjunctival sac. Use of MPS containing quaternary ammonium compounds may select for the carriage of organisms harbouring QAC genes, as the low concentration of disinfecting agents is not adequate for killing gene-positive strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilbert P, Moore LE (2005) Cationic antiseptics: diversity of action under a common epithet. J Appl Microbiol 99:703–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grare M, Dibama HM, Lafosse S, Ribon A, Mourer M, Regnouf-de-Vains JB, Finance C, Duval RE (2010) Cationic compounds with activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria: interest of a new compound compared with two older antiseptics, hexamidine and chlorhexidine. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:432–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson JG, Saye EJ, Jimenez-Truque N, Soper N, Thomsen I, Talbot TR, Creech CB (2013) Frequency of disinfectant resistance genes in pediatric strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1326–1327

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang M, O’Donoghue MM, Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Boost MV (2011) Prevalence of antiseptic-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci colonising nurses and the general population in Hong Kong. J Hosp Infect 78:113–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer S, Boos M, Beyer A, Fluit AC, Schmitz FJ (2001) Distribution of the antiseptic resistance genes qacA, qacB and qacC in 497 methicillin-resistant and -susceptible European isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 47:896–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi GS, Boost MV, Cho P (2015) Prevalence of antiseptic-resistance genes in staphylococci isolated from orthokeratology lens and spectacle wearers in Hong Kong. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:3069–3074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furi L, Ciusa ML, Knight D, Di Lorenzo V, Tocci N, Cirasola D, Aragones L, Coelho JR, Freitas AT, Marchi E, Moce L, Visa P, Northwood JB, Viti C, Borghi E, Orefici G, BIOHYPO Consortium, Morrissey I, Oggioni MR (2013) Evaluation of reduced susceptibility to quaternary ammonium compounds and bisbiguanides in clinical isolates and laboratory-generated mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3488–3497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith K, Gemmell CG, Hunter IS (2008) The association between biocide tolerance and the presence or absence of qac genes among hospital-acquired and communityacquired MRSA isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:78–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Choy CKM, Cho P, Boost MV (2013) Cytotoxicity of rigid gas-permeable lens care solutions. Clin Exp Optom 96(5):467–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois D, Leyssene D, Chacornac JP, Kostrzewa M, Schmit PO, Talon R, Bonnet R, Delmas J (2010) Identification of a variety of Staphylococcus species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 48:941–945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. ISO (2014) Ophthalmic optics—contact lens care products—Method to assess contact lens care products with contact lenses in a lens case, challenged with bacterial and fungal organisms. 18259:2014. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  12. Cabrera JV, Rodriguez JB (1996) Ocular bacterial flora in contact lens wearers. Int Contact Lens Clin 23:149–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bourcier T, Thomas F, Borderie V, Chaumeil C, Laroche L (2003) Bacterial keratitis: predisposing factors, clinical and microbiological review of 300 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 87:834–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Høvding G (1981) The conjunctival and contact lens bacterial flora during lens wear. Acta Ophthalmol 59:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleiszig SM, Efron N (1992) Conjunctival flora in extended wear of rigid gas permeable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 69:354–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elander TR, Goldberg MA, Salinger CL, Tan JR, Levy B, Abbott RL (1992) Microbial changes in the ocular environment with contact lens wear. CLAOJ 18:53–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McClellan KA, Cripps AW, Clancy RL, Billson FA (1998) The effect of successful contact lens wear on mucosal immunity of the eye. Ophthalmol 105:1471–1477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boost MV, Cho P (2005) Microbial flora of tears of orthokeratology patients, and microbial contamination of contact lenses and contact lens accessories. Optom Vis Sci 82:451–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yung AM, Boost MV, Cho P, Yap M (2007) The effect of a compliance enhancement strategy (self-review) on the level of lens care compliance and contamination of contact lenses and lens care accessories. Clin Exp Optom 90:190–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sidhu MS, Heir E, Leegaard T, Wiger K, Holck A (2002) Frequency of disinfectant resistance genes and genetic linkage with beta-lactamase transposon Tn552 among clinical staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2797–2803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Klumpp S, Hwa T (2014) Bacterial growth: global effects on gene expression, growth feedback and proteome partition. Curr Opin Biotechnol 28:96–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klumpp S, Zhang Z, Hwa T (2009) Growth-rate dependent global effects on gene expression in bacteria. Cell 139:1366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang M, O’Dononghue M, Boost MV (2012) Characterization of staphylococci contaminating automated teller machines in Hong Kong. Epidemiol Infect 140:1366–1371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bjorland J, Steinum T, Kvitle B, Waage S, Sunde M, Heir E (2005) Widespread distribution of disinfectant resistance genes among staphylococci of bovine and caprine origin in Norway. J Clin Microbiol 43:4363–4368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ye HF, Zhang M, O’Donoghue M, Boost M (2012) Are qacG, qacH and qacJ genes transferring from food isolates to carriage isolates of staphylococci? J Hosp Infect 80:95–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Control strains were kindly provided by Prof K Hiromatsu and Prof J Bjorland. The authors are grateful to Mr Jeffrey Ho for his technical help and Ms Peggy Cheung, Ms TT Lee, Ms Cherie Chan, Mr Terry Ng, and Ms Angel Wong for their help with subject recruitment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maureen Boost.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was supported by a Research Postgraduate Student Grant from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University to GS Shi.

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2002 and ethics approval was obtained from the Departmental Research Committee of the School of Optometry.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from a parent or guardian of each of the children enrolled in the study. The study aims and requirements were explained to the parent and risks and benefits of ortho-k treatment were discussed before admission to the study. Each parent was given an information sheet and could contact the clinic for guidance between scheduled visits. Participants were informed that they could leave the study at any time without penalty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guang-sen, S., Boost, M. & Cho, P. Prevalence of antiseptic resistance genes increases in staphylococcal isolates from orthokeratology lens wearers over initial six-month period of use. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35, 955–962 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2622-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2622-z

Keywords

Navigation