Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of different culture methods and of a commercial molecular assay for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in nursing homes and rehabilitation centers

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last several years, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) have been increasingly detected not only among patients in acute care hospitals, but also in long-term care facilities. In this point prevalence survey, residents from three nursing homes and patients in one rehabilitation center were screened for asymptomatic intestinal carriage of CPE by rectal swabs. The first objective was to evaluate the hypothesis of the establishment of a CPE reservoir in a geriatric/chronic care population. Secondly, we evaluated the comparative performances of different culture methods (chromID® CARBA, chromID® OXA-48, MacConkey with temocillin/meropenem, ertapenem enrichment broth) and a commercial molecular assay (Check-Direct CPE). From the 257 included residents, only one had evidence for CPE carriage. From the rectal swabs of this resident, an OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae could be isolated and was confirmed by a molecular assay both on the strain and on the rectal swab. The specificity of the different culture methods and Check-Direct CPE was at least 97 %. Neither enrichment broth nor prolonged incubation up to 48 h increased the yield of CPE. This point prevalence survey shows a low CPE prevalence of 0.39 %. Larger scaled studies are needed in order to confirm the role of chronic care settings as secondary CPE reservoirs and to adjust the infection control and prevention recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L (2011) Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1791–1798. doi:10.3201/eid1710.110655

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reddy P, Malczynski M, Obias A, Reiner S, Jin N, Huang J, Noskin GA, Zembower T (2007) Screening for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae among high-risk patients and rates of subsequent bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 45:846–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin MY, Lyles-Banks RD, Lolans K, Hines DW, Spear JB, Petrak R, Trick WE, Weinstein RA, Hayden MK; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program (2013) The importance of long-term acute care hospitals in the regional epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Infect Dis 57:1246–1252. doi:10.1093/cid/cit500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang T-D, Bogaerts P, Berhin C, Jans B, Deplano A, Denis O, Glupczynski Y (2011) Rapid emergence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Belgium. Euro Surveill 16(26). pii: 19900

  5. Glupczynski Y, Huang TD, Bouchahrouf W, Rezende de Castro R, Bauraing C, Gérard M, Verbruggen AM, Deplano A, Denis O, Bogaerts P (2012) Rapid emergence and spread of OXA-48-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Belgian hospitals. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39:168–172. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.10.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) (2013) Susceptibility testing methodology, version 13. Available online at: http://bsac.org.uk/susceptibility/methodologylatestversion/. Accessed 5 July 2014

  7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2013) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-first informational supplement; CLSI document M100-S21. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA

  8. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (2013) Clinical breakpoints. Available online at: http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/. Accessed 5 July 2014

  9. Nijhuis R, Samuelsen O, Savelkoul P, van Zwet A (2013) Evaluation of a new real-time PCR assay (Check-Direct CPE) for rapid detection of KPC, OXA-48, VIM, and NDM carbapenemases using spiked rectal swabs. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 77:316–320. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.09.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang TD, Berhin C, Bogaerts P, Glupczynski Y; Multicentre Study Group (2013) Prevalence and mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems in Enterobacteriaceae isolates from 24 hospitals in Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1832–1837. doi:10.1093/jac/dkt096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zong Z (2012) Discovery of blaOXA-199, a chromosome-based blaOXA-48-like variant, in Shewanella xiamenensis. PLoS One 7:e48280. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048280

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoefnagels-Schuermans A, Niclaes L, Buntinx F, Suetens C, Jans B, Verhaegen J, Van Eldere J (2002) Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23:546–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

chromID® CARBA and chromID® OXA-48 chromogenic agars were kindly provided by bioMérieux.

We are indebted to Noël Saegeman for the logistical support.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Saegeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saegeman, V., Van den Eynde, J., Niclaes, L. et al. Performance of different culture methods and of a commercial molecular assay for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in nursing homes and rehabilitation centers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34, 991–997 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2318-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2318-9

Keywords

Navigation