Colonisation and interaction between S. epidermidis and S. aureus in the nose and throat of healthy adolescents

  • E. G. A. Fredheim
  • T. Flægstad
  • F. Askarian
  • C. Klingenberg
Article

Abstract

Nasal colonisation with Staphylococcus aureus is a risk factor for developing nosocomial infections. It has been reported that S. epidermidis may produce a serine protease (Esp) inhibiting S. aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonisation. We aimed to analyse the correlation between S. aureus nasal and/or throat carriage and co-colonisation with S. epidermidis strains carrying esp, and the inhibitory effects of S. epidermidis culture supernatants on S. aureus biofilm formation and growth. We obtained 114 S. epidermidis isolates from the nose and 74 S. aureus from the nose and/or throat of healthy adolescents. S. aureus biofilm formation was analysed in a microtitre plate assay and the prevalence of ica, encoding biofilm formation, and esp was analysed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Inhibitory effects of S. epidermidis culture supernatants on S. aureus biofilm formation and growth was analysed in vitro. esp prevalence and expression was correlated with inhibitory effects. We detected biofilm formation in 45/74 (61 %) S. aureus strains. The ica operon was more prevalent in isolates colonising the nose (12/15; 80 %) versus isolates colonising the throat only (8/46; 17 %). Almost two-thirds of S. epidermidis culture supernatants displayed high (≥50 %) S. aureus biofilm inhibitory activity, without affecting growth. We found no correlation between the level of inhibitory activity and S. aureus colonisation. esp was ubiquitous in S. epidermidis, but esp expression did not correlate with biofilm inhibitory activity. S. epidermidis culture supernatants inhibit S. aureus biofilm formation, but do not affect bacterial growth. esp expression was not correlated with the inhibitory effects observed.

References

  1. 1.
    Aires de Sousa M, de Lencastre H (2004) Bridges from hospitals to the laboratory: genetic portraits of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 40:101–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Belkum A (2011) Novel technology to study co-evolution of humans and Staphylococcus aureus: consequences for interpreting the biology of colonisation and infection. Adv Exp Med Biol 697:273–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wertheim HF, Vos MC, Boelens HA, Voss A, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Meester MH, Kluytmans JA, van Keulen PH, Verbrugh HA (2004) Low prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at hospital admission in the Netherlands: the value of search and destroy and restrictive antibiotic use. J Hosp Infect 56:321–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ten Broeke-Smits NJ, Kummer JA, Bleys RL, Fluit AC, Boel CH (2010) Hair follicles as a niche of Staphylococcus aureus in the nose; is a more effective decolonisation strategy needed? J Hosp Infect 76:211–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G (2001) Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Study Group. N Engl J Med 344:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luzar MA, Coles GA, Faller B, Slingeneyer A, Dah GD, Briat C, Wone C, Knefati Y, Kessler M, Peluso F (1990) Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infection in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. N Engl J Med 322:505–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tong SY, Chen LF, Fowler VG Jr (2012) Colonization, pathogenicity, host susceptibility, and therapeutics for Staphylococcus aureus: what is the clinical relevance? Semin Immunopathol 34:185–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bode LG, Kluytmans JA, Wertheim HF, Bogaers D, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Roosendaal R, Troelstra A, Box AT, Voss A, van der Tweel I, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, Vos MC (2010) Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 362:9–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frank DN, Feazel LM, Bessesen MT, Price CS, Janoff EN, Pace NR (2010) The human nasal microbiota and Staphylococcus aureus carriage. PLoS One 5:e10598CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lina G, Boutite F, Tristan A, Bes M, Etienne J, Vandenesch F (2003) Bacterial competition for human nasal cavity colonization: role of Staphylococcal agr alleles. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:18–23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wos-Oxley ML, Plumeier I, von Eiff C, Taudien S, Platzer M, Vilchez-Vargas R, Becker K, Pieper DH (2010) A poke into the diversity and associations within human anterior nare microbial communities. ISME J 4:839–851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H, Takada K, Agata T, Mizunoe Y (2010) Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 465:346–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sugimoto S, Iwamoto T, Takada K, Okuda K, Tajima A, Iwase T, Mizunoe Y (2013) Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp degrades specific proteins associated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and host–pathogen interaction. J Bacteriol 195:1645–1655CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krismer B, Peschel A (2011) Does Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization involve biofilm formation? Future Microbiol 6:489–493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Otto M (2009) Staphylococcus epidermidis—the ‘accidental’ pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:555–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cantero D, Cooksley C, Bassiouni A, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S (2013) Staphylococcus aureus biofilm activates the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (Nod2) pathway and proinflammatory factors on a human sinonasal explant model. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 3:877–884CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gelardi M, Passalacqua G, Fiorella ML, Quaranta N (2013) Assessment of biofilm by nasal cytology in different forms of rhinitis and its functional correlations. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 45:25–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cantero D, Cooksley C, Jardeleza C, Bassiouni A, Jones D, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S (2013) A human nasal explant model to study Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 3:556–562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fitzpatrick F, Humphreys H, O’Gara JP (2006) Environmental regulation of biofilm development in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J Hosp Infect 62:120–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hanssen AM, Kjeldsen G, Sollid JU (2004) Local variants of Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:285–296CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, Beachey EH (1985) Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22:996–1006PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fredheim EG, Klingenberg C, Rohde H, Frankenberger S, Gaustad P, Flaegstad T, Sollid JE (2009) Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus haemolyticus. J Clin Microbiol 47:1172–1180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knobloch JK, Horstkotte MA, Rohde H, Mack D (2002) Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Med Microbiol Immunol 191:101–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ikeda Y, Ohara-Nemoto Y, Kimura S, Ishibashi K, Kikuchi K (2004) PCR-based identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis targeting gseA encoding the glutamic-acid-specific protease. Can J Microbiol 50:493–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klingenberg C, Aarag E, Rønnestad A, Sollid JE, Abrahamsen TG, Kjeldsen G, Flaegstad T (2005) Coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis in neonates. Association between antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation and the host inflammatory response. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24:817–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Flemming K, Klingenberg C, Cavanagh JP, Sletteng M, Stensen W, Svendsen JS, Flaegstad T (2009) High in vitro antimicrobial activity of synthetic antimicrobial peptidomimetics against staphylococcal biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother 63:136–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Papa R, Parrilli E, Sannino F, Barbato G, Tutino ML, Artini M, Selan L (2013) Anti-biofilm activity of the Antarctic marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125. Res Microbiol 164:450–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomas JC, Vargas MR, Miragaia M, Peacock SJ, Archer GL, Enright MC (2007) Improved multilocus sequence typing scheme for Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol 45:616–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sangvik M, Olsen RS, Olsen K, Simonsen GS, Furberg AS, Sollid JU (2011) Age- and gender-associated Staphylococcus aureus spa types found among nasal carriers in a general population: the Tromso Staph and Skin Study. J Clin Microbiol 49:4213–4218CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Faria NA, Conceição T, Miragaia M, Bartels MD, de Lencastre H, Westh H (2014) Nasal carriage of methicillin resistant staphylococci. Microb Drug Resist 20:108–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rolo J, de Lencastre H, Miragaia M (2012) Strategies of adaptation of Staphylococcus epidermidis to hospital and community: amplification and diversification of SCCmec. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:1333–1341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. G. A. Fredheim
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. Flægstad
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Askarian
    • 3
  • C. Klingenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PaediatricsUniversity Hospital of North NorwayTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Paediatric Research Group, Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  3. 3.Research Group for Host–Microbe Interactions, Department of Medical BiologyUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations