Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Economic evaluation of treatment for MRSA complicated skin and soft tissue infections in Glasgow hospitals

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the UK, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-associated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are predominantly managed in the hospital using intravenous (IV) glycopeptides. We set out to explore the potential for and relative healthcare costs of earlier hospital discharge through switch to oral antibiotic therapy (linezolid or rifampicin and doxycycline) or continuation of IV therapy (teicoplanin) via an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service. Over 16 months, 173 patients were retrospectively identified with MRSA SSTI, of whom 82.8 % were treated with IV therapy. Thirty-seven patients were potentially suitable for earlier discharge with outpatient therapy. The model assumed 3 days of inpatient management and a maximum of 14 days of outpatient therapy. For the status quo, where patients received only inpatient care with IV therapy, hospital costs were calculated at £12,316 per patient, with 97 % of costs accounted for by direct bed day costs. The mean total cost savings achievable through OPAT or oral therapy was estimated to be £6,136 and £6,159 per patient treated, respectively. A significant proportion of patients with MRSA SSTI may be suitable for outpatient management with either oral therapy or via OPAT, with the potential for significant reduction in healthcare costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y (2005) The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26:166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melzer M, Eykyn SJ, Gransden WR, Chinn S (2003) Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus more virulent than methicillin-susceptible S. aureus? A comparative cohort study of British patients with nosocomial infection and bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 37:1453–1460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Engemann JJ, Carmeli Y, Cosgrove SE et al (2003) Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis 36:592–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goetghebeur M, Landry PA, Han D, Vicente C (2007) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A public health issue with economic consequences. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 18:27–34

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. King MD, Humphrey BJ, Wang YF, Kourbatova EV, Ray SM, Blumberg HM (2006) Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Ann Intern Med 144:309–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wier LM, Henke R, Friedman B (2010) Diagnostic groups with rapidly increasing costs, by payer, 2001–2007. HCUP Statistical Brief #91. June 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD. Available online at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb91.pdf

  7. Personal correspondence Matthew Armstrong, Principle Information Analyst, NHS National Services Scotland

  8. Gould FK, Brindle R, Chadwick PR et al (2009) Guidelines (2008) for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the United Kingdom. J Antimicrob Chemother 63:849–861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dryden M, Andrasevic AT, Bassetti M et al (2010) A European survey of antibiotic management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: current clinical opinion and practice. Clin Microbiol Infect 16(Suppl 1):3–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seaton RA, Sharp E, Bezlyak V, Weir CJ (2011) Factors associated with outcome and duration of therapy in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) patients with skin and soft-tissue infections. Int J Antimicrob Chemother 38:243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Department of Health Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection (ARHAI) (2011) Antimicrobial Stewardship: “Start Smart—Then Focus (formally 25). Available online at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_131181.pdf

  12. Chapman ALN, Seaton RA, Cooper MA et al (2012) Good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults in the UK: a consensus statement. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:1053–1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dryden M, Saeed K, Townsend R et al (2012) Antibiotic stewardship and early discharge from hospital: impact of a structured approach to antimicrobial management. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2289–2296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nathwani D, Morgan M, Masterton RG et al (2008) Guidelines for UK practice for the diagnosis and management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections presenting in the community. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:976–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lamont E, Seaton RA, Macpherson M, Semple L, Bell E, Thomson AH (2009) Development of teicoplanin dosage guidelines for patients treated within an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) programme. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:181–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martone WJ, Lindfield KC, Katz DE (2008) Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy with daptomycin: insights from a patient registry. Int J Clin Pract 62:1183–1187

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman ALN, Dixon S, Andrews D, Lillie PJ, Bazaz R, Patchett JD (2009) Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a UK perspective. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:1316–1324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. NHS reference costs 2007–08. Available online at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_098945

  19. Curtis L (2008) Unit costs of health and social care. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, UK

    Google Scholar 

  20. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society (2010) British National Formulary 59. British Medical Journal Publishing Group and Pharmaceutical Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Cock E, Sorensen S, Levrat F et al (2009) Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France. Med Mal Infect 39:330–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weigelt J, Itani K, Stevens D, Lau W, Dryden M, Knirsch C; Linezolid CSSTI Study Group (2005) Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2260–2266

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Itani KM, Biswas P, Reisman A, Bhattacharyya H, Baruch AM (2012) Clinical efficacy of oral linezolid compared with intravenous vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a retrospective, propensity score-matched, case–control analysis. Clin Ther 34:1667–1673.e1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bounthavong M, Hsu DI (2010) Efficacy and safety of linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI): a meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 26:407–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gray A, Dryden M, Charos A (2012) Antibiotic management and early discharge from hospital: an economic analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2297–2302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seaton RA, Bell E, Gourlay Y, Semple L (2005) Nurse-led management of uncomplicated cellulitis in the community: evaluation of a protocol incorporating intravenous ceftriaxone. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:764–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Health Protection Scotland (2013) Quarterly report on the surveillance of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemias in Scotland, July–September 2012. Available online at: http://www.hps.scot.nhs.uk/haiic/sshaip/wrdetail.aspx?id=53734&wrtype=9

  28. Garau J, Bouza E, Chastre J, Gudiol F, Harbarth S (2009) Management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:125–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Costs book 2009 (Scotland). Available online at: http://isdscotland.org/isd/3632.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

Provisional data were presented at the 19th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), Vienna, Austria, April 2010 (poster 1337). The study was funded via an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer, UK. Technical support in the data collection and analysis was provided by pH Associates Ltd. Thanks go to Professor R. Masterton for contributions to the initial study design and helpful advice on the manuscript.

Transparency declarations

RAS has received honoraria for speaking and for advisory work for Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca and Astellas. No fee was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

SJ was a paid consultant for Pfizer, UK.

JEC has received honoraria for speaking and for advisory work for Pfizer and Astellas. No fee was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

NR has no interests to declare and no fee was received for the preparation or review of this manuscript.

SC is an employee of pH Associates and no fee was received for the preparation or review of this manuscript.

BLJ has received honoraria for speaking and for advisory work for Pfizer, Gilead, MSD, AstraZeneca and Astellas. He owns stock in Pfizer, Gilead and MSD. No fee was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. A. Seaton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seaton, R.A., Johal, S., Coia, J.E. et al. Economic evaluation of treatment for MRSA complicated skin and soft tissue infections in Glasgow hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33, 305–311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1956-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1956-z

Keywords

Navigation