Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rapid confirmation of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonies on chromogenic agars by a new commercial PCR assay, the GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new automated closed tube PCR assay, the GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose (Abacus Diagnostica Oy, Finland) was evaluated for rapid confirmation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from cultured screening specimens. The ability of the assay to detect genotypically different MRSA strains was studied with a collection of 304 MRSA isolates covering 68 spa types. The specificity was investigated with a collection of 146 non-MRSA staphylococcus isolates. The usefulness of the assay for clinical purposes was assessed by a sequential combination of MRSA screening culture and confirmation of the colonies with the GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose assay. A total of 145 suspected MRSA colonies on chromogenic plates were analyzed this way. All MRSA isolates from the culture collection and from the clinical screening specimens were confirmed as MRSA with the GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose assay and none of the non-MRSA staphylococci caused false-positive results, which indicates both sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The combination of GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose with preceding culture on selective MRSA agar permitted MRSA confirmation within 24 h. This practice offers a reliable and quick detection of MRSA that is also suitable in areas where several strain types cause epidemics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marlowe EM, Bankowski MJ (2011) Conventional and molecular methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 49:S53–S56. doi:10.1128/JCM.00791-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nonhoff C, Denis O, Brenner A, Buidin P, Legros N, Thiroux C, Dramaix M, Struelens MJ (2009) Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens: comparison of MRSA chromogenic media. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:363–369. doi:10.1007/s10096-008-0637-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Havill NL, Boyce JM (2010) Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 48:2228–2230. doi:10.1128/JCM.02376-09

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wendt C, Havill NL, Chapin KC, Boyce JM, Dickenson R, Eigner U, Schütt S, Fahr AM (2010) Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in different specimens. J Clin Microbiol 48:2223–2227. doi:10.1128/JCM.02374-09

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huletsky A, Giroux R, Rossbach V, Gagnon M, Vaillancourt M, Bernier M, Gagnon F, Truchon K, Bastien M, Picard FJ, van Belkum A, Oullette M, Roy PH, Bergeron MG (2004) New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 42:1875–1884. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.5.1875-1884.2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Warren DK, Liao RS, Merz LR, Eveland M, Dunne WM Jr (2004) Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 42:5578–5581. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.12.5578-5581.2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rossney AS, Herra CM, Brennan GI, Morgan PM, O’Connell B (2008) Evaluation of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay using the GeneXpert real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens. J Clin Microbiol 46:3285–3290. doi:10.1128/JCM.02487-07

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Otte KM, Jenner S, Wulffen HV (2005) Identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): comparison of a new molecular genetic test kits (GenoType MRSA) with standard diagnostic methods. Clin Lab 51:389–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sissonen S, Pasanen T, Salmenlinna S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Tarkka E, Vaara M, Tissari P (2009) Evaluation of commercial MRSA assay when multiple MRSA strains are causing epidemics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:1271–1273. doi:10.1007/s10096-009-0771-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stamper PD, Louie L, Wong H, Simor AE, Farley JE, Carroll KC (2011) Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates misidentified as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay. J Clin Microbiol 49:1240–1244. doi:10.1128/JCM.02220-10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blanc DS, Basset P, Nahimana-Tessemo I, Jaton K, Greub G, Zanetti G (2011) High proportion of wrongly identified methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers by use of a rapid commercial PCR assay due to presence of staphylococcal cassette chromosome element lacking the mecA gene. J Clin Microbiol 49:722–724. doi:10.1128/JCM.01988-10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Snyder JW, Munier GK, Johnson CL (2010) Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbiol 48:1305–1309. doi:10.1128/JCM.01326-09

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laurent C, Bogaerts P, Schoevaerdts D, Denis O, Deplano A, Swine C, Struelens MJ, Glupczynski Y (2010) Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nares swabs of geriatric hospitalized patients and failure to detect a specific SCCmec type IV variant. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:995–1002. doi:10.1007/s10096-010-0958-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arbefeville SS, Zhang K, Kroeger JS, Howard WJ, Diekema DJ, Richter SS (2011) Prevalence and genetic relatedness of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates detected by the Xpert MRSA nasal assay. J Clin Microbiol 49:2996–2999. doi:10.1128/JCM.00046-11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Farley JE, Stamper PD, Ross T, Cai M, Speser S, Carroll KC (2008) Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from an at-risk community population. J Clin Microbiol 46:743–746. doi:10.1128/JCM.02071-07

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibrahem S, Salmenlinna S, Kerttula AM, Virolainen-Julkunen A, Kuusela P, Vuopio-Varkila J (2005) Comparison of genotypes of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in Finland. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24:325–328. doi:10.1007/s10096-005-1328-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerttula AM, Lyytikäinen O, Karden-Lilja M, Ibrahem S, Salmenlinna S, Virolainen A, Vuopio-Varkila J (2007) Nationwide trends in molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Finland, 1997–2004. BMC Infect Dis 7:94–101. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-7-94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murchan S, Kaufmann ME, Deplano A, de Ryck R, Struelens M, Zinn CE, Fussing V, Salmenlinna S, Vuopio-Varkila J, El Solh N, Cuny C, Witte W, Tassios PT, Legakis N, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Vindel A, Laconcha I, Garaizar J, Haeggman S, Olsson-Liljequist B, Ransjo U, Coombes G, Cookson B (2003) Harmonization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for epidemiological typing of strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a single approach developed by consensus in 10 European laboratories and its application for tracing the spread of related strains. J Clin Microbiol 41:1574–1585. doi:10.1128/JCM.41.4.1574-1585.2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vainio A, Kardén-Lilja M, Ibrahem S, Kerttula AM, Salmenlinna S, Virolainen A, Vuopio-Varkila J (2008) Clonality of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in Finland as defined by several molecular methods. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27:545–555. doi:10.1007/s10096-008-0470-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bannerman TL, Peacock SJ (2007) Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and other catalase-positive cocci. In: Murray PR (ed) Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th edn. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp 390–411

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kanerva M, Salmenlinna S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Lehtinen P, Möttönen T, Virtanen MJ, Lyytikäinen O (2009) Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Finland in 2004 to 2006. J Clin Microbiol 47:2655–2657. doi:10.1128/JCM.00771-09

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2007) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 17th informational supplement. Approved standard MS100-S17. CLSI, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murakami K, Minamide W, Wada K, Nakamura E, Teraoka H, Watanabe S (1991) Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 29:2240–2244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. von Lode P, Syrjälä A, Hagren V, Kojola H, Soukka T, Lövgren T, Nurmi J (2007) Fully automated, homogeneous nucleic acid detection technology based on dry-reagent assay chemistry and time-resolved fluorometry. Clin Chem 53:2014–2017. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2007.090928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rantakokko-Jalava K, Nikkari S, Jalava J, Eerola E, Skurnik M, Meurman O, Ruuskanen O, Alanen A, Kotilainen E, Toivanen P, Kotilainen P (2000) Direct amplification of rRNA genes in diagnosis of bacterial infections. J Clin Microbiol 38:32–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pasanen T, Korkeila M, Mero S, Tarkka E, Piiparinen H, Vuopio-Varkila J, Vaara M, Tissari P (2010) A selective broth enrichment combined with real-time nuc-mecA-PCR in the exclusion of MRSA. APMIS 118:74–80. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2009.02562.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. García-Álvarez L, Holden MT, Lindsay H, Webb CR, Brown DF, Curran MD, Walpole E, Brooks K, Pickard DJ, Teale C, Parkhill J, Bentley SD, Edwards GF, Girvan EK, Kearns AM, Pichon B, Hill RL, Larsen AR, Skov RL, Peacock SJ, Maskell DJ, Holmes MA (2011) Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 11:595–603. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cuny C, Layer F, Strommenger B, Witte W (2011) Rare occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC130 with a novel mecA homologue in humans in Germany. PLoS One 6:e24360. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The GenomEra CDX instruments and the GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose test kits were kindly provided by Abacus Diagnostica Oy (Turku, Finland) for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Hirvonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirvonen, J.J., Nevalainen, M., Tissari, P. et al. Rapid confirmation of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonies on chromogenic agars by a new commercial PCR assay, the GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 1961–1968 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1527-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1527-0

Keywords

Navigation