Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative in vitro antimicrobial activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and ceftobiprole in four different peritoneal dialysis fluids

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis used in the treatment of patients with end-stage renal failure is often complicated by peritonitis. Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis is severe, particularly if caused by a methicillin-resistant strain (MRSA). Intraperitoneal administration of drugs for treatment of peritonitis is preferable to intravenous or oral routes because of the resulting higher local antibiotic concentrations. However, peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) have a bacteriostatic effect, which may compromise the efficacy of antibiotics. The bactericidal efficacy of vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and ceftobiprole was studied in the PDFs Dianeal PD4® (glucose 1.36%), Physioneal 40® (glucose 1.36%), Extraneal® (7.5% icodextrin), and Nutrineal PD4® (1.1% amino acid) using time-kill curves. To simulate in vivo conditions, human serum albumin was added at a final concentration of 2 g/l. All four PDFs had a bacteriostatic effect on the growth of the MRSA test isolate. All antibiotics showed less activity in PDFs compared to control broth. Vancomycin and teicoplanin achieved the greatest reduction in bacterial numbers in the amino-acid containing PDF Nutrineal PD4®. Daptomycin showed its highest activity in Extraneal® and better overall efficacy than the other tested antibiotics. Ceftobiprole showed no killing activities in any of the four PDFs. Based on these in vitro data we conclude that the choice of PDFs for intraperitoneal administration is not trivial and could be crucial for therapy outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J, Boeschoten E, Gupta A, Holmes C, Kuijper EJ, Li PK, Lye WC, Mujais S, Paterson DL, Fontan MP, Ramos A, Schaefer F, Uttley L (2005) Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update. Perit Dial Int 25(2):107–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Perez Fontan M, Rodriguez-Carmona A, Garcia-Naveiro R, Rosales M, Villaverde P, Valdes F (2005) Peritonitis-related mortality in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 25(3):274–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fried L, Abidi S, Bernardini J, Johnston JR, Piraino B (1999) Hospitalization in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 33(5):927–933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried LF, Bernardini J, Johnston JR, Piraino B (1996) Peritonitis influences mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 7(10):2176–2182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Finkelstein ES, Jekel J, Troidle L, Gorban-Brennan N, Finkelstein FO, Bia FJ (2002) Patterns of infection in patients maintained on long-term peritoneal dialysis therapy with multiple episodes of peritonitis. Am J Kidney Dis 39(6):1278–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B, Bernardini J, Figueiredo AE, Gupta A, Johnson DW, Kuijper EJ, Lye WC, Salzer W, Schaefer F, Struijk DG (2010) Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update. Perit Dial Int 30(4):393–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cozens RM, Tuomanen E, Tosch W, Zak O, Suter J, Tomasz A (1986) Evaluation of the bactericidal activity of beta-lactam antibiotics on slowly growing bacteria cultured in the chemostat. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 29(5):797–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tuomanen E, Cozens R, Tosch W, Zak O, Tomasz A (1986) The rate of killing of Escherichia coli by beta-lactam antibiotics is strictly proportional to the rate of bacterial growth. J Gen Microbiol 132(5):1297–1304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clouse FL, Hovde LB, Rotschafer JC (2007) In vitro evaluation of the activities of telavancin, cefazolin, and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in peritoneal dialysate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51(12):4521–4524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hermsen ED, Hovde LB, Hotchkiss JR, Rotschafer JC (2003) Increased killing of staphylococci and streptococci by daptomycin compared with cefazolin and vancomycin in an in vitro peritoneal dialysate model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47(12):3764–3767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute C (2008) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 18th informational supplement M100-S18. Wayne, PA, USA

  12. Zelenitsky S, Barns L, Findlay I, Alfa M, Ariano R, Fine A, Harding G (2000) Analysis of microbiological trends in peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis from 1991 to 1998. Am J Kidney Dis 36(5):1009–1013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu G, Tu W, Xu C (2010) Mupirocin for preventing exit-site infection and peritonitis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25(2):587–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Vin F, Rutherford P, Faict D (2009) Intraperitoneal administration of drugs in peritoneal dialysis patients: a review of compatibility and guidance for clinical use. Perit Dial Int 29(1):5–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McDonald WA, Watts J, Bowmer MI (1986) Factors affecting Staphylococcus epidermidis growth in peritoneal dialysis solutions. J Clin Microbiol 24(1):104–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz MA, Buckwalter FH (1962) Pharmaceutics of penicillin. J Pharm Sci 51:1119–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mascio CT, Alder JD, Silverman JA (2007) Bactericidal action of daptomycin against stationary-phase and nondividing Staphylococcus aureus cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51(12):4255–4260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carpenter CF, Chambers HF (2004) Daptomycin: another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 38(7):994–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Salzer W (2005) Antimicrobial-resistant gram-positive bacteria in PD peritonitis and the newer antibiotics used to treat them. Perit Dial Int 25(4):313–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiggins KJ, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Strippoli GF (2007) Treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 50(6):967–988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by internal funding.

Transparency declarations

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Burgmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tobudic, S., Poeppl, W., Kratzer, C. et al. Comparative in vitro antimicrobial activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and ceftobiprole in four different peritoneal dialysis fluids. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 1327–1334 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1446-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1446-0

Keywords

Navigation